Preview

How Does Socrates Prove The Soul's Immortality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
662 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Socrates Prove The Soul's Immortality
Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.
The first argument that Socrates uses to explain the soul’s immortality uses snow and fire. He explains to Cebes and Simmias that snow
…show more content…
He reiterates his point that something cannot accept its characteristic’s opposite by stating that, “…not only opposites will receive opposites, but also that nothing which brings the opposite will admit the opposite of that which it brings, in that to which it is brought” (Plato 3). He says that one of the characteristics that the soul possesses is life, which is the opposite of death, so, “…the soul, as has been acknowledged, will never receive the opposite of what she brings” (Plato 3). Socrates explains that the soul can never admit death because it possesses a quality that is death’s opposite. When death approaches the soul, according to his previous arguments, it would either retire or perish; however, “…the soul when attacked by death cannot perish” (Plato 4) because the soul cannot admit death. He believes that when death comes to a man, his body dies, but his soul is preserved (Plato 5). Socrates proves that the soul will not admit death and when it is approached by death, it will not perish, but retire to another

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument Socrates uses is that snow always brings cold, as fire always brings hot. Fire will not bring cold and snow will not bring hot. He uses these opposites to say that soul brings life with it; therefore the soul will never bring death, the opposite of life. Anything that doesn't fall to death is indestructible. The soul must be indestructible. I agree with Socrates that the soul lives on. It makes sense to me that the soul is indestructible with his reasoning behind it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ passage is formulated by the knowledge that the soul consists of three parts that are predisposed by our own desires. He is fundamentally attempting to disprove the notion that the soul is one.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote is significant because it exemplifies the way Socrates uses HIS method. Socrates uses metaphors in order to humbly enlighten his audience. At times Socrates structure of explanation is perceived to be complex and or difficult to interpret. To simplify what he is attempting to get across usually takes a thorough examination. Socrates is from ancient times and his methodology still suits fit to modern day. Analyzing the context of his circumstances before death alone goes to show the depth of understanding one needs to comprehend his ideology and beliefs. This quote also provides us with the notion of not being selfish and to avoid pretentious. When one thinks about death or the chance of dying when they’re in a predicament because…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To Socrates death was only a parting of the soul from the body and due to this he thought that philosophers should stay away from as many bodily pleasures as possible. Bodily pleasures could include fine food, liquor, extravagant outfits, jewelry, and so on. This was in order to keep the souls well-being in the forefront of the mind. Socrates felt the soul should not be bound to the body; it should be free to be released when the time came. Socrates seemed to believe that the soul was immortal and that it would live on in the afterlife. He thought that after a very long time the soul would be brought back again.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments For Phaedo

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Phaedo, Socrates does not fear death because he believes that his soul is immortal and will be sent to heaven after his death. It is worth noticing here that he pre-assumes that the soul exists, so his central argument is not about whether the soul exists, but whether it is immortal. One of his arguments is that the soul is invincible, and invincible things can’t be destroyed, so the soul is immortal. I shall explain more fully this argument in the next paragraph. Then I shall offer my objection on his premise that invincible things can’t be destroyed, and thus how his argument of the immortality of the soul is invaid.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates goes ahead to answer Meno’s argument by telling him that the priests and priestess and other divinely inspired poets say that the soul of a man is immortal. He uses the immortality to say that the soul has seen everything in this world and the other world and, therefore, it has learned everything that is. Therefore man should not be surprised if the soul recalls the knowledge of virtue or anything that the soul possessed. Socrates argues that, when a man…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates first argument is that death is either “a state of nothingness and utter unconscious, or, as men say there is a change and migration of the soul from this world to another” (pg 17). I definitely agree with his arguments, they make sense. I also think that people are always going to fear death at one point in their life. It is a scary thought that you are never going to live again.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates The Afterlife

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates’ view of the afterlife is a little difficult to assess due to the fact that there are not actual written works by Socrates. The only works about him are by other people. Socrates view of death came up in a conversation when asked by Cebes about the poetry he was working on. The discussion starts with the question suicide. Socrates thesis was “the one aim of those who practice philosophy in the proper manner is to practice for dying and death”. He also defines death as the separation of body and soul. All this lead to Socrates conclusion about death which is, upon dying a philosopher is most likely to obtain the wisdom which he has been seeking his whole life. Socrates also had an interesting view of the afterlife. Since “being dead” and “being alive” are opposite states, and “dying” and “coming-to-life” are the two opposite processes between these states, coming-to-life must balance out dying. Socrates also recalled an ancient theory basis just as the souls of the dead in the underworld come from those living in this world; the living souls come back from those of the dead. He concluded that everything that dies must come back to life again. Socrates made a strong argument with valid points that cannot be dismissed. If the two opposite processes did not balance each other out, everything would eventually be in the same state: for example, if increase did not balance out decrease, everything would keep becoming smaller and smaller. Another prime example…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates & the Afterlife

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The realization of death did not leave Socrates in any state of sorrow but rather gave him hope and happiness that he would soon be moving further onto what he believed was the path of the soul. Socrates had no fear of death because he believed specifically in the afterlife and that the soul left the body and moved on to the next phase in life. Socrates states that there are many pathways a soul can follow after death; all depending on how a person acted during life will determine where the go and what happens to their soul. The description of Socrates’ earth is that of a place where gods and men alike can converse and it is a lot like heaven described in Christianity. Many people believe in the same types of ideas about what happens after a person dies; their soul departs and takes upon a whole new journey.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truth and Plato

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Melinda could argue that all things have an opposite, including the soul. Plato’s first argument…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Is a Soul?

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates firmly believes that once death comes, the separation of body and soul occur. According to Socrates, a good philosopher attempts to separate his mind from his body…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, Simmias outlines his theory that the soul is like a harmony. Essentially, this theory claims that a lyre—or harp—is to harmony as body is to soul. The lyre must be tuned and played in just the right way, and if it breaks then the harmony ceases to exist. Therefore, harmony—and also, therefore, soul—does not exist on its own. Simmias argues that the same goes for body and soul, in the sense that the brain must be functioning in a certain way for the soul to exist. Socrates attempts to convince Simmias and Cebes of the inaccuracy of this theory with three arguments: that it is incompatible with the Theory of Recollection, that every soul is equally soul—and thus there cannot be degrees of the soul—and that the soul guides and directs the body, while the harmony does not direct the harp.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soul Searching

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Socrates was the first philosopher to assign a great deal of importance to the human soul. His philosophy equated the quality and goodness of one’s life with the condition of their soul. The soul, he claims, is what animates our body until…

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays