Preview

Paradox Of Inquiry In Meno's Theory Of Recollection

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Paradox Of Inquiry In Meno's Theory Of Recollection
The paradox of inquiry refers to an argument that arises in Plato’s Meno and is called Meno's paradox. Meno asks Socrates if inquiry is possible. On one hand, if an individual already knows what he or she is looking for, then there is no need for inquiry. However, if an individual does not know what he or she is looking for, then inquiry cannot begin. Therefore, this paradox seems to show that inquiry is either impossible or unnecessary. To answer this problem, Socrates introduces his Theory of Recollection. Socrates’ Theory of Recollection, saves learning from Meno’s paradox. Socrates’ method also ensures that virtue can be taught which makes people better.
Socrates goes ahead to answer Meno’s argument by telling him that the priests and priestess and other divinely inspired poets say that the soul of a man is immortal. He uses the immortality to say that the soul has seen everything in this world and the other world and, therefore, it has learned everything that is. Therefore man should not be surprised if the soul recalls the knowledge of virtue or anything that the soul possessed. Socrates argues that, when a man
…show more content…
Socrates asked the slave boy to solve a geometric problem that consist of several steps to reach the solution. To teach the boy and help him find the solution, Socrates asked several questions for each step. Finally, boy was able to solve the question. Here, Socrates concluded that since boy had no knowledge of mathematics, he was taught to solve the question using his previous memory. In same context, Socrates argued with Meno, that virtue can not be taught. If it was similar to knowledge, it could have been taught and there would have been teachers of virtue out there. Therefore, Socrates concluded that virtue is only a trait that is bestowed by God and is not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is an observable and present relationship between truth and storytelling. For Plato, this can be seen in Meno. In this story, Plato is having a conversation with Meno about learning, and Meno declares that learning is impossible (find the actual quote). However, Plato counters Meno’s argument with the Theory of Recollection. In this theory, the soul is immortal, knows everything, and when you are born your soul is burdened by a clumsy body that forgets everything. However, when you learn something, you are just remembering what you (your soul) forgot. For example: you have never seen a triangle. Such a bold declaration is also a defining part of the theory. In order for a triangle to exist, it has to have lines to create it, but the second…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates does not in fact tell his associates anything, but rather helps them understand ideas that were already in them through his series of questions that test whether what his associate says is of truth or not, and so he is not actually giving any knowledge. In the Meno, he shows an example of what he does when he attempts to “bring forth” geometry knowledge from a Greek slave boy. The boy answers some questions incorrectly at first before stating that he does not know. Socrates then continues to ask the boy more questions, and as the boy answers them, he comes to understand it without Socrates ever actually telling the boy anything at all. Socrates then states that “Then he will have knowledge without being taught by anyone but only questioned, since he will have recovered the knowledge from inside himself” (Meno, 85c-85d). He is saying that the boy is able to gain knowledge from Socrates asking him multiple questions about it constantly, and it will come forth within his associates, without him actually telling them anything at all. He also elaborates on this type of wisdom that he has in the Apology, saying “I thought this man seemed wise to many people, and especially to himself, but wasn’t. Then I tried to show him that he thought himself wise, but wasn’t.” (Apology, 21c-21e). Here, Socrates is stating that he has no knowledge, but rather questions the ideas of his associates to help them become more wise. This also showcases the type of wisdom that he does possess, which is knowing that he does not know…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno's Geometric Argument

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the Meno, Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon a slave, a person who has no formal education and walked him through a geometry problem. This problem was meant to illustrate that a person’s knowledge is not based on what this person has learned in their lifetime but their capacity and ability to understand is based on what their soul has learned in previous lifetimes. Socrates uses this example show his thesis is true but what about different scenarios that aren’t math based and through different problems you can see that Socrates theory is half correct and that there are several implications that prove that souls don’t know it all.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Response To The Meno

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Meno, although not for certain, is thought to be one of Plato's earliest dialogues. The dialogue opens with Meno asking Socrates whether virtue can be imparted, or taught, with the two men dwelling on this question (alongside more central questions of what virtue is) for the entirety of the text. Within the text, Socrates tries to dichotomize an ethical term by inquisitively questioning an individual who believes to know the term's denotation, but ultimately determines that neither he nor the "expert" really know what the word means.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meno Paradox Analysis

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Meno Paradox starts around page 79, in these pages Meno and Socrates argue about weather knowledge is learnable or merely a recollection. Lets start by reading the “Meno Paradox”. Meno says, “How will you look for it, Socrates, when you don’t know what it is? How will you aim to search for something you do not know at all? If you should meet with it, how will you know what to look for?”(80d) My interpretation of the text is this, if you know the answer to a question you cannot gain knowledge by asking it. But if you do not know the answer to the question, you will not differentiate the correct answer when given. How can I ever truly know if something is true or false? If I could just keep going to the source of the previous answer and question weather that source is true or false? One might respond by…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    virtue (Farrington). Without knowledge, Socrates felt that life was not worthwhile as is evident when he states, “The unexamined life is no life for man” (Farrington 5). Aristotle also credits Socrates with the analytical procedure known as the art of logic. Through dialect and intelligent conversation, one could logically obtain truth. Such truths must then be fortified and upheld through law and policy. “At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; seperated from law and justice, he is the worst” (Hollister 37). The youth in particular must understand ethics in order to be able to practice and possess ethical traits. Laws, religion and education were and are means of establishing ethical guidelines for the youth to follow. “The…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these passages Socrates talks about how the thoughts inside of us are only are minds remembering things that we have already experienced in another lifetime. He theorized that no new information is obtained and that even individuals who are uneducated can recall information from a previous existence. For example, in the reading a farm boy was asked a series of questions to prove this theory. The theory that is being described is that an individual’s soul is immortal. Our souls are constantly being reborn through reincarnation, an endless cycle of death and rebirth. Although our souls are constantly being reborn they still contain all of the information it has obtained throughout time. Even though I felt that Socrates was leading the farm boy to the conclusions he made during this reading, I found the concept of recalling information instead of acquiring new information to be incredibly interesting and thought…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno Paradox

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Meno has progressed because he has come to some new level of understanding just by admitting he doesn’t know the answers to virtue and being willing to seek out those answers by asking them of someone who does know the answers, Socrates. Socrates doesn’t see this as enough. He considers Meno to be like the slave boy, someone who has opinions that are a compilation of other peoples’ ideas, Gorgias and Socrates, but have yet to be anything of value because these ideas aren’t his own. It is not enough to just want to know the answers if Meno isn’t willing to investigate on his own. Just as the slave boy would become an expert at geometry “if he were repeatedly asked these same questions in various ways” because he will have practiced many different variations of the same concept and will gain true understanding, Meno will only come to claim true understanding by taking the ideas of Gorgias and Socrates and making them his own by practicing his own…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exacty is virtue and how does one describe it? In the dialog Meno, two men, Meno and Socrates, attempt to define virtue. The dialog begins with Meno asking Socrates if virtue can be taught. Personally, I do not imagine that virtue can be taught. Meno does not exactly know what virtue is but guesses that it is to possess power and to retain good things. Socrates argues that learning is impossible because a soul has already learned everything from passed lives and that learning is simply recollection from those past lives. The purpose of this paper is to discuss Meno’s paradox and to determine how Socrates resolves it.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Meno, Plato writes that people answer questions correctly because they can recollect a truth about the subject in question. According to Plato in Meno, however, while there is no truth to recollect, the person cannot answer the question correctly, yet they might just give an opinion (73a). The case in point refers to the slave boy who in Meno answers a question about the theorem of a square yet he is completely ignorant of geometry (82a–f). The boy only gets assistance from Socrates who tells him the properties of a square, and then from there the boy makes…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato, in his book Meno, defines whether or not virtue can be taught. He does so by presenting two different characters; Meno is just a mere prop that Plato utilizes so that he could convey his real messages through Socrates. The book is written in the dialectic style and begins with Meno’s question if virtue is teachable. Socrates responds to Meno’s question by saying that in order to answer that question, one must first know whether virtue can be defined or not. Meno attempts three times to define virtue however, each time Socrates refutes his definition with a counterargument. By the end of his third attempt, Meno calls Socrates a “torpedo fish” because he feels as if all the knowledge that he had acquired from Gorgias was replaced by questions and uncertainty. In the aforementioned passage, in the doxical context, Socrates admits he has this effect on others because he himself doesn’t know . On the other hand, in the ethological context, Socrates is mocking the teachings of Gorgias and the Sophists. Moreover, in a broader perspective, through Socrates, Plato criticizes all who pretend like they have acquired all the knowledge attainable in this world.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates' demonstration with the slave boy, is an effort to use mathematical reasoning to illustrate the process and the importance of keeping an active mind. Simultaneously he is using mathematical reasoning to illustrate how a similar process of reasoning is used in virtually every decision that we make. When Socrates asks the slave boy to find the length of a side of the square with the area of 8, he finds that the answer can neither be 2, nor 3. The manner in which Socrates poses this question, is an attempt to demonstrate the human reasoning process. This process can be characterized by finding a low extreme, finding a high extreme, and coming to understand that the answer to your problem lies somewhere in the middle. The difficulty, which Socrates is clarifying in this situation, is that the extremes are easy to recognize and understand (just as whole numbers such as 2 and 3 are), and humans are prone to being satisfied with that which is easily recognizable. The concise answer is unreachable, the value lies in the process of seeking it, and eliminating that which is untrue, the way perhaps that a sculptor would gradually knock off pieces of a block. This is where the "torpedo's shock" comes into play. Lines are drawn dividing those that choose to stop seeking due to their desire for a concise answer that will never come, and those that dwell in their ignorance, attached to an answer with evidence disproving it. When talking about the impossibility of enquiry, Socrates says, "it will make us idle, and is sweet only to the sluggard." Here Socrates is stating that anyone or anything that contends it knows the truth in such a manner as to hinder this process of enquiry and reasoning, is neither morally or ethically responsible. Also, any answer that leaves us feeling satisfied entirely is a divergence from the truth.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meno Essay

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Can virtue be taught? Plato starts off the Meno with this simple question. Prior to answering this question, Socrates is adamant about first understanding what virtue is. Socrates and Meno go back and forth throughout the story attempting to figure out the definition of virtue. When they come to the conclusion that they do not know what virtue is, they attempt to prove whether virtue can be taught, is attainable by practice, or is simply possessed by nature.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The learning paradox in the Meno describes the problem that a person cannot inquire about what they know or don’t know, because if they know they do not need to ask and if they do not know then they do not know what to ask for. For example, if you are trying to discover what a person looks like, how can you know you’ve found them if you don’t already know what they look like? As I will discuss later on, there are very few contexts in which the learning paradox is valid, this being one of them. The learning paradox was used by Socrates to try and prove innatism, that everything is inside us and has to be brought out. The idea of innatism and learning as recollection all tie together into the main theme…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays