Children or individuals of any age are being exposed to the contaminated water. Just like any other type of water pollution, this tainted river is impacting people who live in Flint, Michigan in unpleasant ways which are why they are considered stakeholders. Some have been undergoing serious amounts of trauma due to nonreversible circumstances. However, the majority of exposed children are experiencing permanent brain damage. According to Philip Landrigan, "The problem here is, no level of lead is safe…”(2) This essentially means it doesn't matter how little or how much of this water was consumed by them, it will have the same awful effect. Despite the fact that they are no longer drinking the toxic water, the damage will follow them for the rest of their …show more content…
After a failed attempt of relieving the city from debt, the chief of drinking water was suspended without pay. Michigan’s governor, Snyder, has borrowed over $200 million from the government for supplies and has now deepened the state in debt.(6) The government is a stakeholder for this crisis because they're losing money. According to Virginia tech engineering professor, Marc Edward, the US government "exposes a new level of arrogance and uncaring that I have never encountered."(6) The government is being negatively affected by this crisis even though they aren't being as cooperative as they could be. The Flint water crisis is an environmental issue that is yet to be resolved. Many people's lives and jobs are at stake because of this troublesome situation, there seems to be no solution to this catastrophe but there is, it's just difficult to achieve. You always hear of environmental issues commencing, however, have you ever heard of them concluding? Will you ever hear of one