Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Fall of the Roman Republic

Satisfactory Essays
556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fall of the Roman Republic
The Roman Republic was great civilization with a very complex political system that still influences governments today. The Roman Republic consisted of three parts. The highest being the Consul that was made up of two male members who are elected annually. Secondly there was the Senate made up of elder statesmen that advised the Consul and finally there was the Assemblies where participants voted by group on issues.
A few of the strengths of the political system was its citizen involvement although plebeians generally didn’t have much authority. Another strength of the political system was that it was governed and based on a well spelt out law to avoid cases of dictatorship. As great as The Roman Republic was it had its weaknesses.
The weakness of the Roman Republic political system was its foreign policies that constantly had the nation at war, which drained its resources and hampered its ability to govern itself. As a result it forced the republic to depart from its tradition and appoint Julius Caesar as a dictator to deal with the social and economic crisis caused.
Julius Caesar played a major role in the civil war that began in 49 B.C.E. The war broke out all throughout the roman world. Caesar had a very decisive win. When he returned to Rome in 46 BCE He had to take on the task of running a republic that had pre existing economic problems, social problems and difficulties due to the wars. Caesar needed to restore stability to the factions that burdened the city with violence. Caesar set into motion his plans to restore the republic to its glory, he established programs of public works to create jobs for the unemployed. To help displaced peasants , he launched colonization programs all around the Mediterranean. Despite his skills the Caesar could not solve the problem of how to govern the republic because the it was growing at a rate that the traditional roman way of governing could not control. The Roman government changed very little over the entire course of the republic because Romans were a very conservative set of people, but their unwillingness to evolve their government with the changing times, was the major contributor to the Caesar’s death and consequently the end of the roman republic.
Caesar had many supporters that were pleased with the peace and order that he brought to Rome, but there were also many people including some of his supporters that were outraged because they believed that peace attained came at the price of the traditional roman republic and at the expense of the old traditional structure of power. Caesar’s iron grip on government left many senators in want for power. So on march 15 44 BCE a plot created by the sixty senators to assassinate Caesar was set into motion and he was assassinated at the foot of the Statue of Pompey.
There were attempts to celebrate his death as victory but the conspirators had no plan beyond Caesar’s murder, so with no way to control the army, or the economy the republic failed under the burden of civil wars. Thus the Roman Empire was created.
Caesar may have been a great leader but his lust for power coupled with the Romans unwillingness to change ultimately leaded the fall of the republic.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Military contributions in Roman times have helped the government, yet have hurt it at the same time. There were several factors that contributed to the collapse of the Roman government. The military leadership had a great impact on the lives in Rome and greatly shaped the empire. People believe that the fall of the Roman Empire was due to the collapse of the government . The military leadership and control quickly began to get out of hand. At one point in Roman…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why having a combination of different governments was because it prevented a select few to have an overwhelming amount of power. The government the Romans where so successful with was a mixture of a monarchy (one key ruler), an aristocracy (rule by few privileged individuals), and a democracy (rule by the people). The Consuls (monarchs) were there to make the important decisions and exercised their power over public affairs. The Senate (aristocracy) was there to settle internal civil disputes and settle foreign conflicts. The people (democracy) were there to decide what course the country would decide to take and what laws reflect the views of the country as a whole. Together, these three “branches” kept each other in check and one couldn't do anything without the consent of the others. The ending result was union and balance in which every member of society had an important role I deciding the course of the country.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman republic overall grade is an +C. I gave them a +C because they did some good and bad things. The roman republic started in 509 BCE. Over time the government developed five major services. They treated slaves bad, but they had a great army and economic system.They also had free aqueducts and fire departments. They showed everybody the laws and were fair.Those were all part of five services, they were provide public services, protect rights, rule of law, common defence, and support the economic system.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The success of the Romans started with their organization within the city. Almost all citizens could vote, and after plebeians were allowed to hold office, almost anybody could be appointed to the Senate and other governmental positions. Voting created a pride in the city, as every person held a stake in the city. It created a sprit that could be seen on the battlefield. Voting also allowed for merit…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrician Vs Plebian

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fellow Romans when we were a republic, there were two major social classes. They were the Patricians and Plebeians. The Patricians were the wealthy and owned most of the land and they held most of the power. The Plebeians were the rest of the republic such as the farmers, artisans, and merchants. The Patricians thought they were the mightiest and greatest of all Romans because of their ancestry, they thought they were better than anybody else and that they have the authority to make laws in Rome. The Plebeians were just citizens who were thought to be inferior and had the right to vote. Luckily, the Patricians had some decency and allowed the Plebeians to form their own assembly…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is because he created the 10th Legion and proved himself to be an adept military leader (Biography.com Editors 14). Also, Caesar reformed the Roman calendar and greatly increased the size of the Roman Senate (Biography.com Editors 14). However, everything Caesar did was only to increase his influence with the people of Rome so that he could become more powerful. For instance, the only reason Caesar expanded the Roman Senate, was so that he could fill it with allies who would later advocate for him. Moreover, Caesar ruled as dictator for only a year before his assassination, the majority of his actions that took place beforehand that are often seen as good were only a campaign that Caesar was a part of in an attempt to gain popularity, one in which he succeeded. Overall, everything Caesar did was for himself, although he was an innovative think as well as an adept military leader, he had a blatant disregard for the prosperity of all of his people, even the ones that he viewed as being…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius caesar crossed the rubicon which started a civil war that destroyed the republic of Rome. He gave land to landless people to provide reform and so people appreciated him. Caesar told the landowners to hire more free workers so that he was popular with Rome’s poor. Julius used Rome’s power and was cruel to people Rome defeated in battles. He also punished people who wanted to confirm the laws of the republic.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman society allowed people to live their own lives to their preference without the worry of breaking the law or being thrown out of society. At the same time, they also consisted of an organized Roman Senate that was already inherited making their decisions consistent, but at the same time the citizens were allowed to express opinions through a voting system. Social standings allowed citizens to build up from poverty and become wealthy, rather than not having the freedom of being as powerful as you can. Overall, the Roman system is better than the Athenian system when it comes to citizenship, republican system, and social standings because Roman citizens were provided with more freedom and had fewer…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem within the government system is one internal weakness of roman republic. The government od Roman republic had three major supports, which offset and balanced on another.(textbook 91) The supreme civil and military offices were two men called consuls. In later the Romans appointed a man as dictator, whose authority surpassed that of the consuls, but dictator cannot hold their office more six months. The second part was an advisory body of elder stateman, the senate. The last part of government system were assemblies that included all adult male citizens.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays