Preview

Patrician Vs Plebian

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patrician Vs Plebian
Patrician or Plebian: Does It Really Matter?
Demetria Veniceia

Fellow Romans when we were a republic, there were two major social classes. They were the Patricians and Plebeians. The Patricians were the wealthy and owned most of the land and they held most of the power. The Plebeians were the rest of the republic such as the farmers, artisans, and merchants. The Patricians thought they were the mightiest and greatest of all Romans because of their ancestry, they thought they were better than anybody else and that they have the authority to make laws in Rome. The Plebeians were just citizens who were thought to be inferior and had the right to vote. Luckily, the Patricians had some decency and allowed the Plebeians to form their own assembly
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain What Role Did Pudor Play In The Battle Between Horatius Cocles
    • 4160 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Explain What Role Did Pudor Play In The Battle Between Horatius Cocles

    How did one become a patrician in early Rome? How could a family become a patrician family in Rome during the period of the Late Republic?…

    • 4160 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of How Democratic Was The Roman Republic?

    First, there were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies. For instance, “ all voting had to be conduct in Rome.” ( From “How democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward) Once Roman territory has expanded, it was mostly the well-to-do rural voters and their clients who could afford time and expense to come to Rome…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    To What Degree Did the Battle of Actium Mark the Establishment of a Monarchy?
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To What Degree Did the Battle of Actium Mark the Establishment of a Monarchy?

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Similarities And Differences Between Akhenaten And Mesopotamian
    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Similarities And Differences Between Akhenaten And Mesopotamian

    Akhenaten believed that everybody should be happy. He peacefully lived in the new capital city Akhetaten but was unaware about what was happening outside of Egypt. Tushratta, the king of the Mittani (located in present-day Syria) sent a letter complaining that Akhenaten had sent gold-plated statues rather than sending statues made of solid gold. The Hittites, an empire located in Mesopotamia attacked Mittani. Even though the situation was desperate, Akhenaten refused to send troops to fight against the Hittites. Akhenaten died circa 1335 BC in year 17 of his reign. It is believed that Smenkhkare succeeded the throne. It is believed that Smenkhkare was either Akhenaten’s son or his cousin.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc

    The structure of the Republic and its underlying flaws, shown through individual actions, was integral to the weakening of the Roman Republic. This government consisted of two factions; the Optimate and the Populares. The Optimates were traditionalist politicians, who supported the republic and wished to minimize the power of the popular assemblies and the Tribunes of the plebs. The Populares represented the people and relied on the legislative assemblies and the Tribunate to gain power. The senate tended to side with the Optimates as there key interests coincided. They were perturbed with the idea of individuals rising through the assemblies, backed by their armies and the Tribunate. When Pompey wished to secure land for his war veterans in 62 BC, the senate blocked him, as they did not want him gaining power and challenging them. This relates to the relative power of the Senate and the assemblies. The senate could pass decrees in the form of advice. However if this conflicted with a law passed through the assembly, it would override the senates decree. The Senate had tried to undermine this power; yet, was restored under the consulships of Caesar in 59 and Crassus and Pompey in 55. As the republic declined, individuals used the tribunes and the assemblies for their personal gain. This is how Pompey and Crassus passed laws,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Senate Influence The Roman Government
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Senate Influence The Roman Government

    At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roman Tribune Research Paper
    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roman Tribune Research Paper

    They were supposed to pay taxes and fight in battles. Which I think is wrong because nobody should be forced into battle. Plebs were also not allowed to vote in decision over wars and peace. They called the patrician the privileged class in Rome. They were the rich and had everything the plebs didn't. Plebes struggle with equal rights but soon got them.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC
    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome before 264BC

    The Romans had a basic law of sorts, called the laws of the Twelve Tables. This governed a lot of Roman daily life and proceedings, and was the basis of a sort of equal rights scheme for the plebeian class. In addition to this, the Lex Hortensia, passed in 287BC, further blurred the distinctions between plebeians and patricians. The twelve tables, and any laws passed by a plebeian assembly, would now be binding to both plebeians and patricians, a sort of social justice.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    Seeing as Rome had a new Democratic government, not one individual could rule. However, they still had votes on who to elect for government and for the contestants it was big competition. According to Document A “Life of Caesar” by Plutarch, even the competition for smaller, miserable-looking communities was tough. This is because there is always “jealous…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change
    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Sparta Change

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Changes and continuities of Roman empire
    • 1420 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Changes and continuities of Roman empire

    The Romans overthrew the Etruscans in 509 B.C.E. The Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years. Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls who ruled the Roman republic. A senate composed of Patricians elected these consuls and at this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote. Under certain circumstances, the senate and the consuls could appoint a temporary dictator to rule for a limited time until the crisis was resolved. One of the innovations of the Roman Republic was the notion of equality under the law. In 449 B.C.E., government leaders carved some of Rome 's most important laws into 12 great tablets. During the last three centuries of the republic, Rome experienced a long series of civil wars, economic as well as political issues, and civil crisis caused by the dictatorship of Julius Caesar. After Caesar’s death, another civil war broke out destroying what was left of the Roman republic. Caesar’s adopted son, Octavian, joined forces with a general named Mark Antony and a politician named Lepidus. They took control of Rome for ten years as the Second triumvirate. The alliance ended in violence and jealousy. Octavian forced Lepidus to retire and then became rivals with Mark Antony. Octavian believed Mark Antony was plotting to rule Rome from Egypt,…

    • 1420 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Chart Depicting the Ancient Roman Empire
    • 783 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chart Depicting the Ancient Roman Empire

    -The lower class (plebeians) was represented by Tribunes who could veto decisions made by consul and senate.…

    • 783 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrician Vs Plebeian Class
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Patrician Vs Plebeian Class

    To intertwine the economic and political difference between the Patricians and the Plebeian class, the economical aspect must first be examined. Plebeian economical environments consisted of property positioned outside of the walls of Rome with most of these properties consisting of farms subjected to various elements that made the properties easily worthless during the early times of Rome. Patrician economical environments consisted of property positioned inside of the walls of Rome, which conceded a higher amount of protection and retained either its’ original value or a close match.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome Research Paper
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ancient Rome Research Paper

    The upper house, Senate, was exclusively controlled by patricians, the upper class of Ancient Rome society. The lower house, the Centuriate Assembly, has a huge representation by the plebians even though it was still technically heavily influenced by the patricians. Similarly, our nation's policy making rests on the Senate and Congress, with both houses counteracting one another to ensure that not one house exercises greater power than the other. In addition, in modern United Stated, a well-established, well-organized government consisting of the judicial, executive and legislative branches provided checks and balance. Nevertheless, elitism was a prevalent phenomenon in the ruling class of Ancient Rome, much like the current American elite politicians yielding vast political power.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    World Empires
    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    World Empires

    Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics