Preview

The English Civil War: Causes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The English Civil War: Causes
‘The English civil war started in 1642, primarily because of religious disagreements’. How far do you agree with this statement?
On 22 august 1642, Charles 1 declared war against hi enemies in parliament. This led to a civil war where 1 in 10 men died. In this essay I am going to explain the main causes of the civil war and then I am going to see how much I agree with the statement.
Charles got off to a bad start in 1625 when he married a French, catholic princess called Henrietta Maria. This was a very bad mistake as Charles and most of England were devoted members of the Church of England (Protestants). This was wrong as the princess could have changed the religion of England by persuading her husband and also she could have made her children catholic and they were heirs to the throne. One of the main religious reasons was that in 1633 Charles made William laud the archbishop of Canterbury. This was bad because he was a catholic and most of the people in England didn’t like that.
Another reason why Charles was not any good at sorting out religious problems was the Scottish rebellions. This was caused by Charles I making the Scottish use English prayer books. They did not like this as they were much more puritan than English people so they were unhappy about Charles changing their religion. This angered the Scots so much that they invaded England in 1639. As Charles was short of money to fight the Scots, he had to recall Parliament in 1640 as only they had the necessary money needed to fight a war and the required authority to collect extra money.
One of the more political reasons for the English civil war was the individual reign of Charles I of England. In 1629, Charles copied his father. He refused to let Parliament meet. Members of Parliament arrived at Westminster to find that the doors had been locked with large chains and padlocks. They were locked out for eleven years - a period they called the Eleven Years Tyranny. This was the period of his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles had to face many financial problems. He lots of arguments with parliament about these problems and many of them were linked to religious and political issues. He needed money to fight wars against Spain and France. He also needed to control the uprisings in Scotland and he had to pay of his own expenses from his lavish lifestyle. He was only getting only a seventh of the money he requested from parliament so he decided to rule without them. This lasted from 1629 to 1640. This didn’t help him with his money raising though because he wasn’t being paid at…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The religious quarrels began right at the start of Charles' reign, when Charles married Henrietta Maria, a French Catholic. Although Charles didn't choose to marry her - his father, James, set up the marriage - the public, especially the Puritans, didn't like having a Catholic as Queen. A few extremists even saw this as a sign that Charles was secretly Catholic! After the King dissolved Parliament, he made William Laud the Archbishop of Canterbury, in 1633. While Laud was Archbishop, he made many changes to the Church. Most of these changes involved beatifying the Church and bringing back robes for priests, statues and stained-glass windows. All these things reminded the English of Catholicism, and it did not please the Presbyterians (puritans) who believed that church should just be about “you” and God, no extravagance was required and it was considered to be unnecessary.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion was a major impact on Charles and Parliaments relationship causing major tension in the years 1625-1629; however there were other contributing factors, such as key individuals, finance, foreign policy and Charles’ own personality. Furthermore I do not agree with the statement that religion was the most important factor that caused the breakdown of relations between the crown and Parliament. Instead I believe finance and foreign policy to be the most important factors in the breakdown in relations.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In England, the civil war was a rebellion by parliament against the king. There was a direct conflict and struggle in determining each of their roles in governing the nation. After the Tudor dynasty ended with the death of Queen Elizabeth in 1603; her cousin, King James VI of Scotland became King James I of England and thus began the Stuart lineage. Though he was influential in his homeland, he knew little about the English laws, institutions, and customs. James believed in divine right and consequently alienated the parliament who were accustomed to the Tudor’s “balanced polity”. Parliament did however manage to keep the power of the purse and expressed their unhappiness by refusing the king’s money requests. King James’ additional failure was stemmed from religious affiliations. The Puritans in the country wanted James to eliminate the Episcopal system of the church organization in which bishops or episcopos held a major role in the administration and replace it with the Presbyterian model. This model was used in Scotland, replicated after Calvin’s church in Geneva where ministers and elders played an important governing role. However, their pleas were pushed away by James’ refusal because he realized in the Anglican Church, the bishops were appointed by the crown. This gave the monarchy supreme authority over church and state. At this time there was a growing opposition of the king and now the Puritans joined in with other English gentry.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Charles I was most to blame for causing the Civil War, 1642-45”. Do you agree?…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many disagree that Charles was to blame, however his actions did add to this. Religion had been a problem for Charles’ father, James I. Perhaps, this would hinder Charles in his reign as this would be remembered by the people. In 1625 Charles married a French princess, Henrietta Maria who was a Catholic and openly attended Catholic Mass. This perturbed the parliament and the people, they feared if the couple were to have children, their country would eventually be converted back to Catholicism.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the year 1860, the people of America believed that they were happiest and luckiest people across the globe however, the Civil War brought in a new era in the history of America the importance of the result is that it brought slavery in the US to an end. However, the politicians in the south and the north in the course of this war never believed the liberty of slaves to be the major concern of the war. When discussing the causes of the Civil War, there are two aspects that are taken into consideration: primary causes and secondary causes. The election of President Abraham Lincoln is considered the primary cause. On the other hand, the secondary causes of the Civil War were a complex chain of political, factional and socio-economic disparities evidenced between the North and the South, the most important of these being the states’ rights.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Unrest in Scotland - because Charles attempted to force a new prayer book on the country - put an end to his personal rule…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June 1642, Parliament released the Nineteen Propositions, this fully divided the King and his supporters from Parliament and their supporters. It was the final straw because the demands with the propositions were so extreme that it would render the King useless.These demands included all political decisions must be passed through Parliament, all ministers must be approved by Parliament, and Parliament is to control the army. The most arduous demand being that Parliament control the marriage and educations of the King's children, as this demand would allow for Parliament to indoctrinate the King's children and shape them into what they want. There was no way that Charles were to agree to these demands, and Parliament knew it as well, thusly bringing conflict closer. This also culminated when in March of 1642, Parliament took control of the English army without the King's permission. This escalated the conflict to a point of no return as now both sides were armed, and ready to fight. Parliament had the choice of diplomatic resolution and chose to fight. Parliament's milization and unreasonable demands were the final straw in the events that lead up to the war.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil War Causes

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A common assumption to explain the cause of the American Civil War was that the North was no longer willing to tolerate slavery as being part of the fabric of US society. Also, that the political power brokers in Washington were planning to abolish slavery throughout the Union. Therefore for many people slavery is the key issue to explain the causes of the American Civil War. However, it is not as simple as this and slavery, while a major issue, was not the only issue that pushed America into the Great American Tragedy. By April 1861, slavery had become hopelessly entangled and complex with state rights, the power of the federal government over the states and the South’s way of life – all of which made a major contribution to the causes of…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I am going to clarify why the civil war started. A civil war is a conflict fought between inhabitants of the same country. In this case the two sides that fought against each other in England were King Charles I’s side and Parliament’s side. The main reasons for going to war were parts of these three main topics: Money, Religion and Power. There were many reasons for the civil war, some of the proceedings of 1642 were the grand remonstrates made by parliaments for more power, I will further explicate this later in the essay. I am also going to explain the long - term causes and the short - term causes also known as the triggers.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The New Model Army

    • 4395 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The English Civil War, in one way or another, was a response to the aftermath of the Reformation which left behind political unrest and separate religious groups with indifferences and nonconformity. The Civil War affected everyone from commoners and the up and coming rising middle classes to the ruling aristocracy and Parliament. Parliament would eventually go on to create the New Model Army in response to events that surrounded Charles I, personal rule and his marriage to a catholic Queen Henrietta Maria, the daughter of Henry IV of France. (1600-1649). (Visual Sources Book), Plate 10.1a, (p.52). (online britroyals). However, the trigger for unrest and the Civil War was brought about by the king’s demand for money through taxation. (Unit. 9, pp.18-19). Charles I, had the strong belief, that he had the divine and absolute right to rule his three kingdoms, politically and religiously as it was the divine rights of Kings.…

    • 4395 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causes of the Civil War

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Causes of the Civil War Essay Social long term: ● North was opposed to slavery while the South was pro slavery ● The primary conflict of the civil war was whether the states had the right to decide what they wanted to do with slavery. (radical abolition vs pro slavery) ● One of the arising conflicts that led to the American Civil war was the growing abolition movement in the North ● which was an effort to end slavery in a nation that valued personal freedom and believed "all men are created equal." ● Abolitionists: William Lloyd Garrison: The voice of Abolitionism. Originally a supporter of colonization, Garrison changed his position and became the leader of the emerging anti-slavery movement. His publication, THE LIBERATOR, reached thousands of individuals worldwide. His ceaseless, uncompromising position on the moral outrage that was slavery made him loved and hated by many Americans. Although The Liberator was Garrison's most prominent abolitionist activity, he had been involved in the fight to end slavery for years prior to its publication. In 1831, Garrison published the first edition of The Liberator. His words, "I am in earnest — I will not equivocate I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch — AND I WILL BE HEARD," clarified the position of the NEW ABOLITIONISTS. Garrison was not interested in compromise. He founded the NEW ENGLAND ANTI-SLAVERY SOCIETY the following year. ● Frederick Douglass: Born a slave in Maryland escaped to MA in 1838, became an outspoken leader of antislavery sentiment. Douglass served as an adviser to President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War and fought for the adoption of constitutional amendments that guaranteed voting rights and other civil liberties for blacks. He provided a powerful voice then that was championing human rights. He is still revered today for his contributions against racial injustice.He also helped people escape to the North from the underground Railroad. ● Pro Slavery: John C. Calhoun: He believed…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indeed, it would be inaccurate to suggest that there hasn’t been historical debate in what caused the English Civil war due to the bias historical interpretation possesses. Many former historians have proposed that it was long term causes that eventually deepened to cause uncontrollable conflict and division within England, such as religious and socioeconomic factors. Yet contemporary historians such Revisionists focus on short term factors, emphasising that it was the absolutist rule of King Charles who caused social and political breakdown escalating to war. Additionally, post- revisionists assess short term causes but value long term factors as a necessary cause for the English Civil War. For a historian to suggest what factors integrated…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays