Preview

The Danger of Iran, S Nuclear Program

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Danger of Iran, S Nuclear Program
Levi Swart
27 March, 2013

Iran's Nuclear Ambitions And Quest For Islamist World Domination The President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, stated in one of his speeches that “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury,”. This bellicose statement is extremely significant and one that should not be dismissed or ignored. America is quite open with the fact that it recognizes Israel as a country and looks upon Israel as its biggest ally in the Middle East . America clearly fits into the category of one of the countries that in Mahmoud Ahmadinejad words, “will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation”. Many believe the concept of Iran destroying America and Israel is farfetched and impossible. However as each day passes Iran gets closer to having the nuclear power to achieve this “impossible idea”. Iran claims that their nuclear program is not to be used to make nuclear weapons. However America and many other countries cannot trust that claim and do nothing while Iran develops its nuclear capabilities. Iran’s nuclear program must be stopped immediately to insure the security of America , Israel and many other countries. We cannot remain complacent and believe the words of a man who has often proclaimed that he would be happy to see the demise of an entire country and its inhabitants. A man that openly denies the Holocaust on national television, and once stated that “ Iran can recruit hundreds of suicide bombers a day. Suicide is an invincible weapon, Suicide bombers in this land showed us the way and they enlighten our future”. How can we believe a man who supports suicide bombers who give up there their own lives to kill innocent men women and children ? Ahmadinejad’s reference to “suicide bombers in this land” alludes to the Iran-Iraq war in which thousands of young Iranians were used a human weapons. In his article “Suicide bombing as Worship: Dimensions of Jihad” author Denis McEoin writes that:“It was a real-life

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Karen Armstrong is a historian of monotheistic religions. In” Murderous Martyrdom: Religion or politics?” Armstrong relies heavily on Logos to support her claim that the use of suicide attacks is a political weapon of manipulation, rather than a collective Islamic tendency. Armstrong draws compelling, supporting evidence from a Gallup poll covering 35 countries, consisting of both moderate and radical Muslims, stating her evidence logically in support of political motivations. Support for politically motivated violence begins by referencing Robert Pape’s study conclusions that 95% of suicide attacks between 1980 and 2004 intended to compel withdrawal of Western powers from homelands. Moreover, in paragraph 4, the Gallup poll respondents indicated:…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The use of females as suicide bombers is a relatively recent occurrence, and they are increasingly becoming the weapon of choice. Female suicide bombers seem to have caused uproar among the international community, as heads of state and scholars appear shocked to learn that they would now need to broaden the scope of potential suicide bombers. However, the reaction of the international community is surprising. If history tells us that women have always taken part in militancy, then why would the use of female suicide bombers be unexpected? Could it possibly be the method of violence that the women are using? Specifically, could it be the two elements involved in the violent act of suicide bombing: killing one’s self in addition to others, (which distinguishes it from other types of violence that focuses only on killing others). However, taken from this angle, the question then centres on why there is not as much attention and gendered psychological discourse that concentrates around male suicide bombers as there is on female suicide bombers. This question indicates that there is likely something about females using the method of suicide bombing that promotes a gendered psychological discourse on the issue. The paper will focus on the way in which scholars treat Palestinian female suicide bombers as gendered subjects.…

    • 4944 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Naomi Nye, a female writer, is an American citizen, half American, half Palestinian. The writer wrote an essay “To Any Would-Be Terrorists” describing in a sad and frustrated way that the terrorists should find another way to live and make peace with the world by stopping the terrorism acts since the world needs not to suffer more pain. The writer’s purpose was to show the Americans that not all Arab-Americans agree to the acts that the Arabs do and that they feel with them especially after the events of 9/11. However, she may have successfully appealed to them, but the appeals presented made her appear to be against Arabs; moreover, it may have lead to distorting our image.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debacle between the U.S.A and Iran started many years ago with the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979, before that they had rather good relations. Iran’s nuclear activities present a particularly acute security challenge. A nuclear-armed Iran would present a direct threat to U.S. friends, allies and wellbeing in the region and destabilize an already delicate…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The president has in his infinite wisdom decided to renegotiate the Iran nuclear deal by kicking the ball to congress. Realizing that the neo-cons are biting at the bit for some real military action, (as Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and lesser known ones aren't enough) I'm urging you to not add any additional sanctions onto this agreement.…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of Iran developing a nuclear weapon has undoubtedly sparked up an international debate on both sides of the isle. While many in the west debate about which actions to take to prevent the development of the bomb or if Iran is even developing the bomb other countries like Russian and China have been reluctant to criticize. From a western perspective we have to decide whether or not a patient diplomacy is the best approach to Iran’s nuclear problem or not. The consequences of attacking Iran could prove to be just as disastrous as not attacking Iran and being threatened by ban attack. In “Taking Side” two scholars on this issue debate this very question. Christopher Hemmer, from “Responding to a Nuclear Iran” and Norman Podhoretz, editor-at-large for the opinion journal “Commentary” argue on both sides of the issue. This is a general overview of the situation, a summary of each authors main points and a conclusion based on my own opinion.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found the book written by Hooman Majd, to be very informative and interesting, as it exposed a new view of a country, that has always been viewed as anti-western, anti-democracy and dictatorial. This reflection paper will take a look at how the book by Hooman Majd, portrays Islamic Republic of Iran, and why the country and Khomeini seem to oppose western influence and democracy. The outside world and many western countries regard Iran as a dictatorial country that wants to disrupt world peace, through the production of nuclear weapons.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, discriminatory measures are certainly not supported by Judaism, the shared identity between the majority and the Israeli government. As a peace loving religion, Judaism affirms that all men are of equal value and worth, and are inherently pure and good. Similarly, American military airstrikes that kill civilians are not democratic, as they violate the grounding principle of basic human rights as the state cannot take away. Thus, by taking actions that are not supported by Judaism and democracy respectively in combating the threat of the Other, these countries fail to effectively promote and abide by the common identity upon which they have securitized the Other. Hence, it is clear that ulterior socio-economic and political motives lie in the adoption of discriminatory policies by the Israeli government and the increase in military air strikes by the American government, although they are publicized as efforts to mitigate the…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Terrorist Essay

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The unconscionable tragedy that besieged our nation September 11 has shocked Americans. Indeed, images of the carnage that traveled around the world proved how vulnerable the world is to barbaric terrorism. But as that shock turned into anger, a dangerous mix of emotions began to settle across America. Talk-Radio callers queued on the phone to vent their anger after the attacks. "We need to nuke them all!" said one caller. "Throw all foreigners out of the country," declared another. Television news broadcasts brought in so-called experts to discuss the identity of the perpetrators. "All fingers point to the Arabs," alleged one analyst. "We need to keep our eyes on those Muslims," concluded another. These hateful comments were the backdrop to the fear that swept the Arab and Muslim communities here in the United States. Mosques were fire bombed, Muslim women were harassed and some who "looked like they were from that part of the world" were attacked. Regardless of who is ultimately found to be responsible for these terrorist attacks, no ethnic or religious community should be collectively blamed. Blaming ethnicity and religion as the root of this catastrophe only drags countless more innocents into a cycle of hate. Grouping Muslims or Arabs with terrorists is unjust and prejudiced. Even as the unscrupulous criminals behind this tragedy cloak themselves under a veil of religion, we in the civilized world should distinguish between religious beliefs and murderous terrorists. Indeed, all Muslims are utterly and completely disgusted at any acts of violence carried out in the name of their religion. In fact, such violence contradicts the views, teachings and ideals of Islam and Muslims. Islam expressively forbids such acts of violence. Arabs and Muslims are as afraid of this terrorism as are all Americans. The results of terrorism do not distinguish between…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran’s nuclear program and nuclear weapons have grown exponentially since 2003 threatening Middle-Eastern countries and America. Iran has had a nuclear program since the 1950’s when the U.S. helped launch it as part of the Atoms For Peace program. But since then, the program has grown with out regulation from the I.A.E.A.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Media Bias

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On September 11, 2001, the citizens of the United States witnessed a horrific attack on two symbolic buildings in New York City. These tragic events have galvanized the creation and implementation of a myriad of prejudicial and unconstitutional policies designed to provide the illusion of national security while simultaneous creating more instability and animosity between the West and the Middle East. In the wake of 9/11, a multitude of Americans have been overtaken by hysteria and fear. These emotional responses have been generated and intensified by the virtually unanimous Islamophobic propaganda that has been perpetuated by the main stream media. As a result of the media’s anti-Islam campaign, Americans have been persuaded to distrust Muslims, instinctively categorize Muslims as terrorist or potential terrorist, as well as sacrifice essential civil liberties. Scapegoating theorist may argue that this portrayal of Arabs and Muslims is one of the ways the U.S. government is attempting to blame this group of individuals for the economic and societal woes that plague 21st-century-America. In addition, many would argue that decades of excessive Western consumption, along with globalization have contributed to a complicated, unjust, and turbulent geopolitical and economic climate, which has created a Western need for Middle Eastern dominance. Regardless of their true motives, we can clearly witness the media’s hostile categorization of Arabs and Muslims as predominately terroristic or potentially terroristic.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, this question arise in everybody’s mind that what was the cause of the attacks. Later, Osama Bin Laden admitted that Al Qaeda was solely responsible for attacks. It was thought that it was poverty in Middle Eastern countries but it was found that all men, who were involved, belonged to upper class families. People also blame madrasas because they taught young boys violence and hatred towards America.one possible cause was that Islamic people believe that America was degrading Islam world. Later Osama was saying on tape, “What American is tasting now is something insignificant compared to what we have tasted for scores of years. The Islamic world has been tasting this humiliation and this degradation for 80 year. Neither America nor the people who live in it will dream of security before we live in it in Palestine, and not before the infidel armies leave the land of Muhammad.” America’s foreign policy in support of Israel is also one important case. The U.S foreign policies in the Middle East and the support of Israel are also something that didn’t please the Islamic people. Especially, the support America gave Israel during the invasion of southern Lebanon in 1982.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ameer Abdullah

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The British novelist Salman Rushdie has produced various works that have been considered to teeter the line of appropriate and inappropriate to the public view. However, Rushdie’s work the “Satanic Verses” which presented a satirical outlook of Islam, prevailed to be the most controversial and contentious of his line of works. Many Muslims argued that Rushdie’s book demeaned the origins of the Islamic faith and also the Prophet Muhammad; radicals demanded that the book be banned in all countries where Islamic influence persisted. On the other side, there were also observers that debated that Rushdie’s book should not be banned because of Salman Rushdie’s freedoms of expression. This epidemic resulted in the breakout of protest of radical Islamist and death threats against Salman Rushdie. Daniel Pipes’ peace “The Rushdie Affair: The Novel, the Ayatollah and the West,” depicts the issue “The Satanic Verses” poses on a global level. Pipes’ work is strategically put together to explain exactly how the “The Satanic Verses” became such a catastrophic peace of work, how Muslim activist perceived the content within Rushdie’s book, and most importantly in regards to radical Islam today, Daniel Pipes examines how this issue generated problems between Iran and the west, which, ultimately could potentially lead to future complications with radical Islamist.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the world’s superpower, it is the duty of America to take a stand against such a large-scale threat. This threat is the threat of a nuclear war starting in the Middle East. Our most crucial ally is Israel, as we share common values. This ally is being threatened by another nation. Our role now is only one thing: to support our ally and any decision it makes.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays