Preview

the courtroom genius

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1057 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
the courtroom genius
Samyuktha Patil
1216351
BBA LLB A

!
!

THE COURTROOM GENIUS
!

SOLI J SORABJEE AND ARVIND P DATAR

“That some achieve great success, is proof to all that others can achieve it as well” a quote by Abraham Lincoln quoted by the authors at the beginning of the book summaries the experience that reading the book gives. The Courtroom Genius is a book co authored by
Soli J. Sorabjee and Arvind P. Datar on the inspiring life of one of the biggest legends in the field of law Nanabhoy Ardeshir Palkhivala. it maps the meteoric rise of Palkhivala’s legal career. It confines itself to Palkhivala’s career as a lawyer, in doing so traces the illustrious cases that were argued by him. The cases covered are landmark judgements that changed the landscape of the judiciary forever. Unlike most other books that give us an impact of
Palkhivala’s arguments that reflected in the judgements, the book covers the arguments that had been made by Palkhivala in the court to create the history that it did. Soli Sorabjee having had the opportunity to under Palkhivala as a junior in some cases, gives a behind the scenes look into the making and delivering of those arguments. Most of the judgement of the cases that Palkhivala argued do not contain the genius arguments that were advanced that lead to these judgements. This is what makes the book a special read, it not only gives the facts and the judgement that was delivered by judges , but also provides a behind the scenes look into the making and delivering of those arguments. it exhibits Palkhivala’s clarity of legal concepts and his knowledge of law that was so immense that he could talk on almost anything. The objective of the book is to record the Palkhivala’s contribution to the development not only to the Law of Income Tax but also other branches of law as well. Starting from the law reports of 1947 there are literally hundreds of cases in which Palkhivala has argued in the
Supreme Court, the Bombay High

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Landmark Case Evaluation

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper I’m going to detail the judicial process of a Supreme Court case, which was the first of its kind. The Supreme Court did not have original jurisdiction over this case. It traveled through each juridical system before reaching the Supreme Court. This case was of interest to them, not to question it the defendant was guilty, but were his constitutional rights violated in the process of prosecuting him. This case began with an anonymous tip that the defendant was growing illegal contraband at his home. The DEA assigned Detective Padraja and Detective Bartelt to sit on the home. After making the decision that no one was home the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Oberservation

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously resolve a case without a trail. A judge grants summary judgment only if there are no disputes as to the material facts of the case and the party is entitle to judgment as a matter of law. (1) The defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern claim there is no evidence to support that the bartender John Daniels saw any visual signs of intoxication from Edward Hart. This means the defendant isn’t subject to any legal wrong doing. The plaintiff Debbie White is requesting the court to deny the defendants request for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims there is evidence to show the bartender John Daniels saw visual signs that Edward Hart was intoxicated. The plaintiff claims that with the amount of alcohol Edward Hart had consumed in the time he was in the Tavern there would be noticeable visual signs that he was impaired. The plaintiff’s attorney claims there are four (4) factors of actual knowledge of intoxication which would point to visual signs of intoxication. Upon leaving O’Malley’s Tavern Edward Hart crashed his vehicle into the Plaintiffs vehicle causing harm to the Plaintiff and the death of her husband.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Justice. While working as a lawyer he argued over 32 cases before he go into the…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Knowledge itself, is what makes him stand out from others. As being part of the Supreme Court, he has won many cases. He has judged cases such as the Murray vs. Pearson, Chambers vs. Florida & Smith vs. Allwright and Brown vs. Board of Education. He studied law at Howard University and became a Supreme Court Justice.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Law

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: * Kermit Hall, John J. Patrick, Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands, Annenberg Public Policy Center. The Pursuit of Justice: Supreme Court Decisions That Shaped America. Oxford University Press US, 2006.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbons V. Ogden

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case, Gibbons v. Ogden, impacted American commerce and government for over two hundred years in more than one way. Chief Justice Marshall said proudly "E pluribus unum," which means out of many…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Obersvation

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law presented a case which was argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, case number 82A04-8876-CV-285, Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern.…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Liberty University presented a case of White v. Gibbs which is about Mrs. Debbie White and Patrick Gibbs under the civil provisions of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. In this case Mrs. Debbie White sued Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Because White and Gibbs do not live in the same states, the suit was brought in diversity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. However, the suit will be decided under Indiana state law. The main goal of this courtroom is to argue the motion for summary judgment which is concerning the case of Mrs. Debbie White, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. In this case, the plaintiff is Debbie White. Two moot court attorneys who are Amanda Babbitt and Jack Walsh represent Mrs. White. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Also two other moot court attorneys who are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter represent the defendants which are Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clarence Thomas. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 20 January 2012. http://www.oyez.org/justices/clarence_thomas/.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mikula, Mark F., L. Mabunda Mpho, and Allison Marion McClintic. Great American Court Cases. Detroit: Gale Group, 1999. Print.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics