Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Communist Manifesto: Section 1&2

Satisfactory Essays
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Communist Manifesto: Section 1&2
"The Communist Manifesto: Section 1 & 2”

The Communist Manifesto is a document written by Karl Marx, with the help of Friedrich Engels. It was written in the mid 1800s and is concerned with the inequalities in the social classes of the time. It is a story about what is wrong with the government and social class system. It talks about the history of inequalities in social class, solutions to the inequality, and the intent of Communists.
Karl Marx opens The Communist Manifesto stating two facts he believes about Communism. The first is that "Communism is already acknowledged by all European Powers to be itself a Power" (pg. 473). Second he states that, “Communists should "openly publish their views and tendencies" (473). The first section titled "Bourgeois and Proletarians" is an illustration of why Marx believes that all of history is based on class struggles. The Bourgeois represent the rich business and landowners, and Proletarians are the poor workers. Marx goes on to say that the government is basically in place only to further the cause of the evil Bourgeois. In Marx's theory, history is shaped by economic relations alone. I disagree with this view. I fell that Marx should look at other elements such as religion, culture, ideology, and even the individual human being. These factors play a very little role.
In the second section of The Communist Manifesto, "Proletariats and Communists", Marx speaks about changes to be made under Communism. Marx says that the goals of the Communist and proletariat have the same goals in equality. He goes on to speak about how he wants to make all things such as wages, property, and education equal among the rich and poor. In this section, Marx gives examples of reasons to oppose Communism, and then tries to give examples of why these objections are not valid. One of the opposition's arguments that Marx attempts to refute is "that upon abolition of private property all work will cease and universal laziness will overtake us". His argument was that if that is truly the case, because they don't really work, the Bourgeois would have been ruined by laziness. I feel this section is interesting because it demonstrates Marx's methods of responding to criticisms. Marx is harsh and often quite sarcastic about the critiques of Communism. This leaves one to wonder if Marx would have been more convincing if he took a more serious tone about the critiques of Communism.
Karl Marx ends this work with a call to arms for all working class people. He threatens the current ruling class with a Communist revolution. He makes clear the insubordinate intentions towards the current governments of the world. The Communist Manifesto is ended with an inspirational battle cry "Working men of all countries unite!"

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Carl Marx’s book The Communist Manifesto, he writes about a theory of social organization which is based on the holding of all property in common and is available to all as needed (Mish 267). “In the ‘Preface to the English Edition of 1888,’ Engels noted that ‘The history of the Manifesto reflects the history of the modern working-class movement’ and identified it as the most international of all Socialist literature” (Karolides). It is evident because in a perfect world communism would thrive, but it is not a perfect world. People are addicted to power and money. It seems that the more communism is forced upon society the more people yearn for sovereignty. “Marx and Engels saw the Communist Party as…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, was one of the most influential texts of the 19th century. In brief, it outlines how all of human development has been forms of class struggles, first with the feudal lord and peasant, and in later years the bourgeoisie and proletariat. According to Marx, the final stage of the development of society is rebellion of the working class. It is inevitable that the laborers will come to rule themselves and overthrow the capitalists. Capitalism is heavily attacked by Marx; he describes the system as exploitative, cruel, unjust, and therefore destined to be overthrown. Through the manifesto, Marx works to call the workers together to gain control of their future, as he believes they must.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay on Marx and Engel’s Communist Manifesto Throughout Marx and Engle’s Communist Manifesto it is clear that the two display a disposition against the Bourgeoisie, but why is this? From the very first page it is clear that Marx has a strong belief in the hierarchical arrangements of the classes as he opens the manifesto with “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” this sentence in itself is a powerful statement. Marx believed that, Capitalism, which was not a good thing (in his eyes) was fueled by the Bourgeoisie class. That one day this “bourgeoisie dictatorship” would one day, be overthrown by a conflict between this and the Proletariat class.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Invisible Man

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages

    In The Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, was the starting point for the ideology of communism. Karl Heinrich Marx, the “Father” of communism and the most influential socialist in the 19th century, collaborated with Friedrich Engels, a friend and partner, in order to create this (adjective) work. Both socialist, Marx and Engels believed “that private property caused inequality in society and that governments should control their nation’s economy so that the basic needs of people could be satisfied.” (Lansford 14)…

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communist Manifesto was the report that made speculation about the lifestyle of communism. The affirmation faced off regarding the conflict between the various classes of society. Therefore, associations between the classes became noticeably nonexistent; it was then another class another took control. There was disagreement among the people; their attempt was feeble could not handle. The nature of advancement did not keep running as organized, with the qualities of a private communist. This proved that there was a fragile affiliation without a doubt be unsuccessful as time goes on. The entire structure failed when the level of development accomplished a firm level and this was a theory that was used to deal with the extension and usage of communism…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx supported the previous statement by introducing the idea of “dictatorship of the proletariat” in his book the “The Communist Manifesto”. He most probably used the word “dictatorship” to emphasize the absolute rule of only one class that will automatically destroy the other classes and therefore establish a classless society that would share the same values and interests. So as to achieve it, the bourgeoisie class needs to reach a state of “consciousness” that will free them from their desires of private property. In this way, the “dictatorship” is a form of rule that makes the government just a tool in the hands of the proletariat that is vital to free every person (regardless of class) from his needs and achieve self-satisfaction and self-fulfillment by working towards the common interests of the society, rather than an oppressive regime which suppresses personal freedom (Kolakowski 1978). Accordingly, Stalin is the framework of the Russian Communism in which center is placed the class of the Russian workers. He wanted to unite the people and destroy the differences in the society that resulted in social, economical and political conflicts: “organize the…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, Communism is an economic-political philosophy developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the late 19th century. Sharing similar principals that “the social class system was what lead to exploitation of workers”, the worked together and published “The Communist Manifesto” in 1848. They feared that the exploitation of these working class people would eventually create a revolution against the bourgeoisie, who owned the labor power of the proletariat (Communism and Computer Ethics).…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, though sometimes difficult to grasp, was a good read. The Manifesto provided great insight on what communism is truly supposed to be. Not only did it do that but it showed the reasons why communist stand for what they do. Overall I think Marx did a good job on the Manifesto which can be seen in his clear explanations and arguments.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, one of the world's most influential political pieces was first published on February 21, 1848. Commissioned by the communist league and written by communist theorist Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the Communist Manifesto set out the leagues program and purpose. The widespread inequity in the distribution of valuable resources created a political, social, and economic climate perfect for the introduction of Marx and Engels' Manifesto. The work suggested a counter-hegemonic course of action. Marx and Engels were deeply moved by the disparity in the living conditions between two classes of people, the "bourgeois" and "proletariat." They argued that the far smaller bourgeois class held a position of power—a hegemonic control—over the far larger proletariat class. The Manifesto attempted to re-dress that disparity by invoking a proletarian revolution to overthrow capitalism and, eventually, bring about a classless society. In the United States, employment workers in the nineteenth century were feeling increasingly insecure about their jobs, and the unemployed expected little help from the federal government. This resulted in fifteen million unemployed Americans, which, in turn, opened the gateway to widespread unrest among the working class (wikipedia.com). Although, Marx and Engels believed that the principles of the Communist Manifesto could not apply to American society, some Americans seized the ideology. It was "the perfect storm" and the ideology easily gained momentum starting with the labor-unions, moving past the motives to overthrow the ruling upper class, end inequality in gender and finally make general and social improvements. Thus the communist manifesto played a great role in American society by setting a precedent in the nineteenth century.…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This means that Marx wrote it but he discussed the issues in the manifesto with Engles. Its documents the objectives and principals of the Communist League, an organization of artists and intellectuals. It was published in London in 1848, shortly before the revolution in Paris. The manifesto is divided into four parts, which contain radical views about the views of a new capitalist economy. The first part outlines his ideas on history and a prediction on what is yet to come. Joshua Muravchic, from Foreign Policy states that "He and Marx, a pair of 20-something children of privilege, believed they had discovered a pattern to history that would produce socialism regardless of human will or ingenuity (Muravchic 36)."He predicts a confrontation between the all of the classes that existed during the socio-economic revolution. Because of the main logic behind capitalism, Marx believed that the bourgeoisie would seek more power and more wealth. With them doing this, the living conditions of the aristocrats would decrease. He also believed that many of the aristocrats would increase their political awareness and will revolt against the bourgeoisie and would eventually have their victory. In the second part, Marx discusses the importance of Communism. He believed that if private property were to be abolished, class distinctions would be as well. The second part also stresses the importance of the aristocrats and bourgeoisie being put into the same class rank in order for society to prosper the way it should. The third part critiques other social ideas of an unstable economy, which does not pertain as much to the important issues that he believed held a society together as they should. The fourth part discussed the differences between his political issues as opposed to those of the other parties. This part ends with this statement: "Working me of all countries, unite (Progress and Resistance…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (9)In the Communist Manifesto, you learn mankind's ongoing struggle has been linked back to Ancient Roman Times where individuals are socially ranked. In societies that are ranked, there is also differences between individuals that are the poor and the rich. Conflicts between bourgeois and proletarians have often been seen as one taking advantage of the other through the work the other is doing. And while taking exploiting the worker, they treat them as a bystander. The Communist Manifesto defines Marxism as each person being categorized by the position of the role of an owner or worker in Marx’s view.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in reading their work, The Manifesto of the Communist Party, the reader can see that they believed the industrial revolution would act to bring about their ideal communist society. They speak of the bourgeois and the proletarians as an extension of feudal classes of citizens. The bourgeois are the modern capitalists, those who own the means of production and employee the proletarians, the lower working-class citizen (Marx and Engels 2191-2198). In their view, both groups are contradictory, yet also complimentary and needed to bring about their revolutionary vision for a utopian…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays