Human relationships have always been dynamic. Change and adaptability have gone hand in hand with the passing of time for human society. Karl Marx's views on Industrialization and the bourgeoisie had a major impact on how we view our industrial alignment today. Marx and Engel's The Communist Manifesto gives broad views on the subject of the middle class and how they fit into a society that was ruled by feudalism and aristocracy. Capitalism becomes a major topic in a socialist-based society that underwent many changes as industrialization progressed. A government must be dynamic in its nature reflecting the change in society. At times aristocracy has refused to allow society to adapt to the changes that the bourgeoisie …show more content…
This means that Marx wrote it but he discussed the issues in the manifesto with Engles. Its documents the objectives and principals of the Communist League, an organization of artists and intellectuals. It was published in London in 1848, shortly before the revolution in Paris. The manifesto is divided into four parts, which contain radical views about the views of a new capitalist economy. The first part outlines his ideas on history and a prediction on what is yet to come. Joshua Muravchic, from Foreign Policy states that "He and Marx, a pair of 20-something children of privilege, believed they had discovered a pattern to history that would produce socialism regardless of human will or ingenuity (Muravchic 36)."He predicts a confrontation between the all of the classes that existed during the socio-economic revolution. Because of the main logic behind capitalism, Marx believed that the bourgeoisie would seek more power and more wealth. With them doing this, the living conditions of the aristocrats would decrease. He also believed that many of the aristocrats would increase their political awareness and will revolt against the bourgeoisie and would eventually have their victory. In the second part, Marx discusses the importance of Communism. He believed that if private property were to be abolished, class distinctions would be as well. The second part also stresses the importance of the aristocrats and bourgeoisie being put into the same class rank in order for society to prosper the way it should. The third part critiques other social ideas of an unstable economy, which does not pertain as much to the important issues that he believed held a society together as they should. The fourth part discussed the differences between his political issues as opposed to those of the other parties. This part ends with this statement: "Working me of all countries, unite (Progress and Resistance