Preview

The Atomic Bomb: Necessary Or Justified?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Atomic Bomb: Necessary Or Justified?
August 6, 1945, a new age dawned. Technological feats were achieved that our ancestors never would thought possible in such a short period of time, on August 6 Harry S. Truman 33rd president after the death of Roosevelt the United States Airforce flew the "Enola Gay" a B-29 bomber and with its cargo of Airmen piloting, navigating, and doing their job, with them was "Little Boy" the name for the atomic bomb that was ordered to be dropped over Hiroshima, a manufacturing city, in a ploy to get the Japanese to surrender, the first bomb detonated successfully yet the Japanese Emperor Hirohito did not officially surrender until the second Atomic bomb code named " Fat Man" was dropped on Nagasaki creating a devisating mushroom cloud and killing …show more content…
Should we continue to fight, it would not only result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilization". President Harry Truman made a difficult discison and the day the first atomic bomb was dropped Philosophers, Historians, and many other scholars have had the debate: Was using the atomic bomb on human beings justified? I think it was indeed justified and justified on different levels. It prevented a land invasion of japan witch would cost massive toll on American soldiers, the soldiers were already been at war for two long violent years with million's killed and injured and japanese were not to friendly to American POW's there was a hatred built up for the japanese people during this time from military. it was a violent time a much different time then today. After the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the amount of loss on both sides was high and both sides " negative view of one other became almost unbridgeable, says J Samuel Walker in Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and The Use of Atomic Bombs Against …show more content…
The use of suprior military equipment and tactics ended the bloody. Pearl Harbor pulled us into a war that we wanted no direct part of other then suppling weapons and other services to the brits. America could no longer do nothing some action must be taken. I think America was justified for our natuarl right to self defense and a moral duty to eliminate tyranny. President Truman and all officals should govern with a moral compass but this does not mean they are of no morals becuase they have lack of concern for the civilans and more concern for ending the war and ushering in a form of democracy an humane government. I belive Truman showed a understanding of how high the stakes were and had the sheer courage to use the atomic bomb that quickly brought an end to one of the most destructive war's in human history. Making the best decision at the time, with all the circumstances, it seemed to be the moral decision to make. althought it was a crule punishment and a horrible event that took place it set up America to be the ultimate super power that it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945, a plane called the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb, Little Boy on the city of Hiroshima. Hiroshima was a very industrial city; it had a military base and had not yet been bombed. The U.S. military thought Hiroshima would be a good target to display the destructive power of their new super bomb. Harry S. Truman, the president of The United States from 1945 to 1953, decided to drop the atomic bomb due to several reasons. First, he wanted to end the war as soon as possible, second, he wanted to impress to Soviets, and lastly, it was a response to Pearl Harbor.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My opinion it was ok for the for us to go bomb Japan because they bombed the Pearl Harbor, and we had to fight back for our country.I think it was right for president Truman to fight for our country because it would’ve stopped right then and there, they would probably come back and taken over the U.S.A. Another reason, the war started is they figured out a code called Bushido and figured out where Japan was going next and they bombed their ships. Then, the Japanese were defence now and not offence any more. When the U.S.A. went from land to land they were very close to Japan and Japan’s emperor Hirohito said to his crew do not give and keep fight for our country. On the small islands called Okinawa and Iwo Jima they figured out the Japanese…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly the last event that led to the use of an atomic bomb was at Okinawa, the Japanese were unwavering and as a last ditch effort the Japanese unleashed suicide pilots also known as kamikazes to make sure to take as many Americans as they could down with them. After the previously stated events America was considering the use of nuclear weapons to end the war with Japan to prevent unnecessary deaths and use of resources. President Truman was the one made the decision to drop Fat Man on Nagasaki and Little Boy on Hiroshima. They were dropped on August 9th, 1945.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender..." Admiral William D. Leahy (Alperovitz,The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, date of publication unknown) There have been many issues involved with the use of the atomic bomb because of the high cost of lives, and that it was considered to be immoral and unethical. However it has also been considered necessary for the war to have ended, avoiding further casualties on both sides.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, the Japanese did bomb the U.S first but didn’t more than half of the America people tell them they weren’t right for doing it on pearl harbor ? So if their wrong, what makes it okay for the United States? The United states was mad because Japan came to their land and killed their innocent people and destroyed everything that they worked so hard to form, but now it’s suddenly not okay for Japan to be just as upset? It’s not even about who wanted the war to end and who was going to do what! Was killing thousands of innocent women, and children, really worth the satisfaction of being able to say you “won” ? okay sure Japan did awful things, but America lowered themselves to a incredibly low level with this evil action. And were in no way right for their actions at all.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America was justified in its decision to drop Atomic weapons on Japan during World War Two’ Discuss.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It wasn’t necessary to drop the bombs on Japan. It wasn’t justified for many reasons. One reason being that Japan was already on the brink of surrendering. They killed innocent people just for the sake to end a war when there could’ve been other diplomatic ways to end it. It was all immoral.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The U.S. bombing Japan with nukes was not justified was because of 2 reasons. One reason is because they could have easily used a weaker type of bomb to rid Hiroshima and Nagasaki of their military. They didn’t need to wipe out the entire city. Instead of millions and millions of innocent Japanese lives being lost, they could have lost only a couple hundred thousand Japanese soldiers, It would have saved many lives, and the outcome would have been almost the same. This would also save 2 billion dollars from the making of Little Boy, and Fat Man. Another reason why nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki was wrong, is because Russia was attacking a week after the nukes. They could have just won us the war, without causing the nuclear fallout of Hiroshima…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays