Preview

Why Is The Nukes Justified

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
240 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is The Nukes Justified
The U.S. bombing Japan with nukes was not justified was because of 2 reasons. One reason is because they could have easily used a weaker type of bomb to rid Hiroshima and Nagasaki of their military. They didn’t need to wipe out the entire city. Instead of millions and millions of innocent Japanese lives being lost, they could have lost only a couple hundred thousand Japanese soldiers, It would have saved many lives, and the outcome would have been almost the same. This would also save 2 billion dollars from the making of Little Boy, and Fat Man. Another reason why nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki was wrong, is because Russia was attacking a week after the nukes. They could have just won us the war, without causing the nuclear fallout of Hiroshima
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan
    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb
    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Involvement In Ww2 Essay
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    American Involvement In Ww2 Essay

    Firstly, the bombs saved more lives than it claimed. To illustrate, many American and Japanese lives would have been lost in the battles to capture Japan. Similar to the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, the Japanese would never surrender until all of their forces were lost, and this would result in a copious amount of death and despair. The Allied generals estimated over a 1,000,000 lives would have been lost in the upcoming battles if Truman did not decide to end the war with the atomic bombs. Additionally, the Japanese threatened to execute 100,000 Allied prisoners of war if they decided to invade the Japanese mainlands. Thus, by dropping the atomic bombs, many lives, including both Japanese and American, have been saved by bringing the war to an abrupt stop. Furthermore, the Japanese were given a fair warning before the Allies dropped the Atomic bombs. On July 26, a few days before the dropping of the bombs, President Truman issued a final ultimatum for the Japanese forces to surrender or be bombed. Yet, Emperor Hirohito declared that he would not surrender. On account of Emperor Hirohito not surrendering, Truman decided to drop the Atomic Bombs to end the war quickly. Hence, the Japanese were given a choice to surrender or to be bombed, but they chose to be bombed. Although many argue that the Atomic Bombs were not justified because they…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is America Justified Dbq
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Is America Justified Dbq

    America was justified for dropping the bomb on Japan during World War Two because they didn't want to lose any more American lives. These American lives are major values to their loved ones.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War in Japan Wwii
    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War in Japan Wwii

    The bomb should have been used on Japan because they would not surrender even after the Soviet Union declared war on them. They also attacked Pearl Harbor killing 2,335 U.S. servicemen were killed and wounding 1,143. Sixty-eight civilians were also killed and 35 were wounded. During war just fighting with Japan 106, 207 American Heroes were lost; we could not let their deaths be in vein.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why the Us Should Have Dropped the Atomic Bombs on Japan
    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why the Us Should Have Dropped the Atomic Bombs on Japan

    1945 began as a year of increasing tensions between countries as the war extended onto its sixth year. Military groups of the various countries involved were now beginning to seriously consider the conclusion of the war in terms of how the global ceasefire would be carried out and frankly, who would win. After the defeat of the Axis Powers in Europe, the focus had been turned towards the war in Asia and the Pacific Regions in which the Allied Forces of Great Britain, Australia and the USA were in conflict with the Axis power of Japan and her partners. Following the urge to end the war, the ‘Big Three’ made up of the three leaders of the major Allied Forces; Churchill, Stalin and Truman met for what is known as the Potsdam Conference to discuss ‘post-war world’ and as a result, the Potsdam Declaration was written giving the Japanese an opportunity to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”. Despite this opportunity, the Japanese chose to ignore the warning, thus, the US decided to administer the use of their newly developed nuclear weapons and drop the atomic bombs on Japan with both hope and belief that the Japanese would be forced to surrender and thus, ending the war on American terms. At the time, there was massive speculation surrounding the attack. However, the USA had entirely justifiable reasons behind the attack; therefore, they should have dropped the bombs on Japan. Firstly, Japan had been given the opportunity to surrender on peaceful terms but refused due to military being in control of the nation. Secondly, the only alternative was an invasion on Japan; however this action would not end lightly with predictions of huge casualties on the Americans’ part. Furthermore, the Japanese surrendered within a week of the dropping of the bombs proving the effectiveness of the USA’s actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justification Behind Detonation of Nuclear Bombs
    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Justification Behind Detonation of Nuclear Bombs

    How could anyone possibly justify a decision that would result in over 265,000 potentially innocent people losing their lives? Justifications like this have been made throughout history by evil leaders with mal-intentions, or by psychopathic fundamentalists, but never by a governmental organization as respected and trusted as the United States. How is it possible that the most financially and socially developed country in the world is not asked to apologize for taking the lives of thousands of civilians? When reflecting on this decision made by the United States, there are a few factors worth mentioning. The first is the animosity held by the US not only against Japan but the axis powers in general, the strong desire to conclude a very painful time in world history, and the United States desire to become heroic. Although I do not know the specific thought processes and or actions that took place during this difficult time, I do have the ability to gather facts and attempt to recreate a simulation of what took place.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was the Atomic Bomb Justifiable?
    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Was the Atomic Bomb Justifiable?

    "The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender..." Admiral William D. Leahy (Alperovitz,The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, date of publication unknown) There have been many issues involved with the use of the atomic bomb because of the high cost of lives, and that it was considered to be immoral and unethical. However it has also been considered necessary for the war to have ended, avoiding further casualties on both sides.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    u.s justified in dropping atomic bomb
    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    u.s justified in dropping atomic bomb

    Many people today could argue their side and reasons on why they think the United States was justified in bombing Japan. But was Osama in Laden justified in orchestrating 9/11? No one in their right mind would support the killing of innocent civilians on 9/11 on the basis of the argument that Osama Bin Laden and his cohort wanted to end the war between radical Islam and the U.S. So why is it acceptable for the U.S. to have incinerated tens of thousands of civilian men, women, children and babies to end the War, when there was a military alternative? The U.S. could have continued the war against the Japanese armed forces instead of targeting Japanese civilians. If the Japanese civilians who were killed are not deemed to have been innocent because they may have supported the Imperialist Japanese Government, then neither was those who died in the World Trade Center or any Americans, because they support the U.S. Government!…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should The Us Take Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Persuasive Speech
    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    Atomic Bomb Persuasive Speech

    Personally I believe that we should not have dropped the atomic Bomb on Japan. The views for this issue is very questionable. Some say it was justified, because Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. However, others would say that it was inhumane. I am part of these people. if I was the president during this time, I would not have release the bomb, unless it was absolutely necessary to bring the end to World War II.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hiroshima; Right or Wrong?
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hiroshima; Right or Wrong?

    -Historian A had a lot of reasonable and strong perspectives on the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. She views the United States was not justified in dropping the bomb. A huge argument begins with the U.S. knowing that Japan was trying to surrender. This is a great example of unnecessarily kicking someone when they are already down. The Japanese wanted peace and tried to surrender, the only condition was that they could keep their emperor. The U.S. declined and said they had to have an “unconditional surrender.” After the bombing, the U.S. let Japan keep their emperor anyway. The U.S. could have saved so many lives if they had just let the Japanese surrender earlier, considering they gave them their one condition they requested. It seems cruel and impractical of the U.S, because the damage we created was so drastic and clearly unnecessary. Another argument arises when it comes to the true reason why the bomb was dropped. Since Japan was already surrendering, why even drop the atomic bomb? We had won. Historian A claims that the bombing was used as a scare tactic for Russia, showing them what the U.S. could really do in battle. The Japanese were basically a guinea pig and a test, which is completely inhumane. Scientists who worked on the bomb insisted it not be used on people and rather on empty land which would still make a huge statement. The U.S. rejected this idea and bombed the city anyway, causing mass destruction. This was a monstrous and malicious move, killing over 100,000 people who had tried to surrender and just to scare another country. None of this was right on behalf of the United States.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics