Telcome Industry of Pakistan

Future Telecom Markets and Strategy to cope with the Change
Contact Information
Dr. Kashif Azim Janjua [e-mail], [e-mail]
Senior Manager/Director (Training)
PTCL, Pakistan
Tel. # [phone]
Abstract
This paper aims to give an insight into structure of future telecom markets and provide a strategy for the present day telecom operators to operate efficiently in the rapidly transforming telecom world. Multimedia intensive (converging video, voice and data) and peer to peer applications have increased the number of services running on same infrastructure. Internet Protocol (IP) has revolutionized the telecom network providing uniform interface and a separation between infrastructure and services.
Present day telecom markets around the world consist of operators organized as vertically integrated silos because the local telephone industry was always thought to be naturally prone to monopoly due to scale and scope economies. The evolution of multiple services on same network is changing the whole buildup of telecom markets. This paper intends to observe the effects of this evolution on market structure and propose strategy for telecom operators to cope with new market structure. The target of the paper is to apply Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) to study the effects of above said factor. TCE has been applied to study issues relating vertical integration in many fields. IP and the Internet create a large variety of services. Earlier the bandwidth was used only for voice so its specificity was high. Introduction of multiple services using the same bandwidth has lowered bandwidth specificity. Basic transaction cost model presented by Williamson is extended to observe the effects of aforementioned factor to the organization structure of telecommunication firms.
The decrease in bandwidth specificity will increase the market procurement range. A mathematical model is developed to observe this effect. It has been observed

References: [1] Williamson Oliver E. (1975); “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications”; Free Press: New York, pp 1-2. [2] Williamson Oliver E. (1985); “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism”; Free Press: New York, pp 1. [3] Williamson Oliver E. (1991); “Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269-296. [4] Wallis J. and North D. (1986); “Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870– 1970” in Long-Term Factors in the American Economic Growth, edited by Engerman S., and [5] Benham A. and Benham L. (2000); “Measuring the Costs of Exchange” in Institutions, Contracts and Organizations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics”; UK: Edward Elgar, pp [6] Demsetz (1968); “The Cost of Transacting”; Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 82, No. 1. pp 33 - 53. [7] Bhardwaj R. and Brooks L. (1992); “The January Anomaly: Effects of Low Share Price, Transaction Cost, and the Bid-ask Bias”; Journal of Finance No [8] Coase Ronald H. (1937); “The Nature of the Firm”; Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 16 (Nov., 1937); pp [9] Coase Ronald H. (1960); “The Problem of Social Cost”; Journal of Law and Economics, 1-44; Reprinted in Ackermann, Bruce A Brown, 17-22; Reprinted in Medema, Steven G. (1995), The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis, Vol.2, Aldershot, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 5 -48. [10]Williamson Oliver E. (2000); “The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead”; Journal of Economic Literature 38(3), pp 605-607. [11]Williamson Oliver E. (1996); “The Mechanisms of Governance”; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp 55. [12] Monteverde K, Teece DJ. (1982); “Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry”; Bell Journal of Economics 13, pp 206–213. [13] Scott E. Masten (1984); “The Organization of Production: Evidence from the Aerospace Industry”; Journal of Law and Economics, Vol [14] Anderson E, Schmittlein DC. (1984); “Integration of the sales force: an empirical examination”; RAND Journal of Economics 15(Autumn), pp 385–395. [15] Stucky J. (1983); “Vertical Integration and Joint Ventures in the Aluminum Industry”; Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [16] Joskow Paul L. (1987); “Contract Duration and Relationship-Specific Investments: Empirical Evidence from Coal Markets”; The American Economic Review, Vol [17] Walker G., Weber D. (1984); “A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions”; Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol [18] Balakrishnan S., Wernerfelt B. (1986); “Technical Change, Competition and Vertical Integration”; Strategic Management Journal, Vol [19] Gatignon H, Anderson E. (1988); “The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation”; Journal of Law, Economics, and [20] Kaouthar Lajili, Marko Madunic Joseph T. Mahoney (2007); “Testing Organizational Economics Theories of Vertical Integration” available at http://www.business.uiuc.edu/Working_Papers/papers/07-0104.pdf [21] Ben Youram, Porath (1980); “The F-Connection: Families, Friends, and Firms and the Organization of Exchange”; Population and Development Review, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Mar., 1980); pp. 1-30. [22] Williamson Oliver E. (1985); “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism-Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting”; the Free Press, a Division of Macmillan, Inc [23] Williamson Oliver E. (1985); “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism-Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting”; the Free Press, a Division of Macmillan, Inc