Preview

Sustainability Of CAFO

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
477 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sustainability Of CAFO
In “The Future of Food Production,” Sam Forman brings attention to the unsustainable state of our growing industrialized food system. In the shadows of each bite we take lurks hidden costs not only economically but environmentally, socially and healthfully. As consumer’s demands in North America increase, farms have moved away from integration and instead to specialization, also known as “the industrial food system.” The deep divide between these two systems is a clear display of the rapid change in today’s demand-driven market, which begs us to question the sustainability of our new system. As large industrial farms maximize their land and resources for profit we stray farther and farther from the natural balanced process and in turn throw the ecosystem wildly out of harmony. Livestock …show more content…
CAFO’s are undoubtedly less earth friendly than methods of traditional farming in more ways than one; the transport they require is a hefty waste of fossil fuels and the waste that these plants produce can cause massive environmental issues are just the tip of the iceberg. Another issue that can plague large CAFO’s is the threat of bacteria. Living conditions and animal health in this type of environment is not monitored very closely, which can lead to weakened animal immune systems, and eventually to risks for consumers of these meat products. Aside from health drawbacks, people also seem to be weary of the societal impacts of large scale agriculture. Studies have shown that increasing specialized farming in large communities has consistently led to a decrease in population, employment and income. In favour of the industrial method, some argue it is cheaper and more efficient to feed America’s appetite this way. What we don’t see are the hidden costs to the heavily manufactured, seemingly cheaper options: subsidies that our tax dollars account

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the United Nations, producing animals for food, is one of the worlds greatest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. And with the worlds demand for animal produce increasing, animal agriculture consequently consumes in increased amount of water, crops, land and energy. Immense expanses of native habitat around the world have been cleared to grow crops to feed animals, majority of them for factory farms. Factory farms are creating an imbalance, consuming more plant protein in order to produce less animal protein. And with approximately 1 billion people globally suffering from famine, one third of that harvest is going towards factory farm animals, harvest which could provide for approximately 3 billion people. By reducing the consumption of factory farmed animals, resources would be saved, pollution would be reduced and world hunger would be combatted. Ultimately the choices we make in terms of our consumption have a global effect on animals, people and the…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Not only this, but “the farmers profit margin dropped from 35% in the 1950 's to about 9% today.” (Mckibben, 54) This means that “to generate the same income as it did in 1950, a farm today would need to be roughly four times as large.” (Mckibben, 55) As a result of this perpetual growth and centralization, problems like “huge sewage lagoons, miserable animals, vulnerability to sabotage and food-born illness”(mckibben, 61) have become commonplace. Not only this, but “we are running out of the two basic ingredients we need to grow food on an industrial scale: oil and water.” (Mckibben, 62) The situation has become so dire that “we are now facing a near simultaneous depletion of the underground aquifers which have been responsible for the unsustainable, artificial inflation of food production.” At this point of realization, Mckibben begins indulging the reader in a large number of facts that promote a more localized form of farming as the solution to a seemingly endless number of issues. Initially the point is raised that “sustainable agriculture leads to a 93% increase in per-hectare food production.” (Mckibben, 68) The next idea raised is that, “since World War 1, it has been cheaper to use…

    • 3032 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, the authors’ provide a more detailed outline of industrialized farming and the many forces and dangers involved in putting food on the tables of consumers, from food cultivation to distribution. Cultivation involves planting, fertilizing, and growing, which involves seeds, land, soil, fertilizer, and farm workers, but also includes GMOs, chemicals, air, water, and soil impurities, and workplace hazards. Harvesting and processing require further farm labor and factory work, which includes additional workplace hazards and…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The CAFO is the concentrated animal feeding operation in the United States and all over the world. The CAFO is charge of the animals such as pigs, cows, and chicken. They are the corporation that is in charge of the killing and packaging the food. This companies has done, so much to make human happy with the package food they are purchasing in the store. They want to make everyone’s money worth spreading, but they don’t care if what they are doing is corrupting not only the environment but the animals and humans. I personally do not agree with this system because what they are doing is cruel, but it has also gotten out of hands. They are ruining the environment in which we live in, they are overfeeding their animals, and people are dying from…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Do you ever wonder how the grocery markets and major food stores like Wal-Mart keep a huge inventory of meat on hand at all times? More importantly, where is this food coming from? Many people do not put much thought into where food comes from or how it is treated before it arrives in a grocery store. Today’s mass consumption of meat directly correlates with the cycle of how livestock is raised, slaughtered, and served to consumers. The process may be surprising to the average shopper. Mass meat consumption has led to the development of factory farming, or farming where livestock is mass produced. Factory farming has taken mass production of meat to a new level beyond that of traditional farming; however, not much is known…

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Food Inc Arguments

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argument found in Food, Inc.: The industrial production of meat, grains, and vegetables are being mass produced, which leads to health issues, economic and environmental instability, and overall, inhumane acts.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buying any meat, dairy, and egg products is buying from the same four large companies that run the meat industry in America today. By using the Confined/Concentrated Animal Feeding Systems or CAFOs, these companies have made it to the top of the meat industry. CAFOs systems are unethical and pose a huge risk to our environment and our own health. Although these animals are being raised to be consumed does not mean they should live in small pins with no exercise, stand in their own feces, and be pumped with growth hormones and antibiotics. CAFO systems also have a huge impact on our environment, the CAFO systems have a vast amount of waste produced on small amounts of farmlands that cannot decompose properly. Causing farmers to dispose of the…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Meat demand is rapidly rising around the world; this can be contributed to the economic growth in third world countries. As the third world countries standard of living and buying power increases, so does the demand for the expensive protein, meat. As meat becomes less and less a sign of status and power, the worldwide demand for meat will increase, and this will lead to a need to increase the production of meat in the countries which produce the product . As societies evolve, we must be sure that the animals welfare does not get left behind. As Cathy Liss (2007) says,"we need to promote and insist on a complete overhaul in the way farm animals are kept that brings them back to being animals not meat- or milk-producing machines or objects." Today one can use the booming veal industry to examine and help prevent problems that may arise in the not-so- distant future.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered what the eat you are eating came from? The answer: factory farms. Factory farms supply approximately 80% of the poultry, beef, and pork consumed in the United States. These large scale farms slaughter around ten billion animals a year. Small, independent farms have become transitioned into huge enterprises with assembly lines and thousands of workers. Many of the farms are considered concentrated animal feeding operations, or CAFOs. Factory farm’s effect on the environment, effect on human health, and lack of animal welfare proves that they are a destructive industry.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this documentary, the directors, Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn, analyze the effects of factory farming while providing inside looks to the conditions and effects of factory farms. For example, the two travel to and film the conditions of a farm belonging to a premiere “organic” dairy company that claimed to produce grass-fed beef. Kip Andersen stated that “Based on their marketing, it seemed like their farms were an oasis for cows.”(Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret) It is revealed that the farm was not in fact an oasis, but rather a nightmare for cows. The farm kept the cows in tight quarters, were severely overfed, and sold to the beef industry when they could no longer produce milk. At the end of the documentary, the two urge viewers to think about the environmental effects and inhumane conditions of factory farms and change their diets in order to help animals and the environment. The release of this film actually seemed to be effective in proving to viewers that factory farming is not safe for animals, people, and the environment. The documentary is so eye-opening and persuasive that it has convinced many people to cut meat and dairy out of their diets. The fact that this documentary has the power to convince people to change their diets in order to help themselves and the planet shows that people will become more concerned about factory farming when they are exposed to the reality of…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Food, Inc.

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They way humans eat has changed more in the last fifty years than in the previous 10,000. The film Food, Inc. sheds a ghastly light on corporate farming and the industrialization of the food industry. It uses several perspectives ranging from a chicken farmer that is cutting ties with oppressive Perdue, to inside the very plants that chemically treat massive amounts of meat to illustrate just how unnatural and dangerous today’s food can be. The movie is devided into three main segments. The first focuses on the inhumane production of meat, including beef, chicken, and pork. Not only are animals treated inhumanely, the mass production of farm animals has had an enormous and negative impact on our environment from pesticide runoff to increased number of cattle emitting poisonous, ozone-depleting gas. The conglomerate companies care even less of the people they employ. The film mentions how Upton Sinclair’s ‘The Jungle’ changed the workplace forever, creating safer environments for workers and the formation of unions. The companies have regressed the workplace hundreds of years by hiring illegal immigrants that will tolerate shoddy conditions and low pay just to be allowed to work there. The second portion of the movie focuses on the industrial production of grains and vegetables, primarily corn and soy. Focusing on these two grains makes a large portion of food available contain only corn. Also, it is so cheap and readily available that once grass-fed cattle and other farm animals are fed only corn. This corn diet leads to e-coli infections in the animals and, in turn, infects humans and can lead to death. All to lower the cost and increase production. The film's third and final segment is about the economic and legal power, such as food labeling regulations of the major food companies, the profits of which are based on supplying cheap but contaminated food, the heavy use of petroleum-based chemicals (largely pesticides and fertilizers), and the promotion of…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the population eats meat, and even more consume dairy. But do you really know where that meat and dairy you consume comes from? Most of America’s farms have converted to factory farming. A factory farm is a facility housing thousands of animals (such as cows, chickens, and pigs) in confined spaces. “If a factory means efficient, large scale production, then that is what it is” states David Leyonhjelm. As a result of factory farming, there is a large supply of meat and dairy for a cheap price. According to Leyonhjelm, “the world will be consuming two-thirds more animal protein in 2050 than it does today”. The demand for animal protein will skyrocket. “Since 1967 global production of poultry meat has increased 700%, eggs by 350%, pig…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mass food production has become an increasing issue in the world. It was created to help solve the lack of nutrition problem that was created by the staggering population growth of the human race. Short term it has solved the issue it was created for. But there are inherent risks that come with this type of food production. Mass food production causes a great deal of stress on the environment. The land, air, and water in the areas used for this production are slowly being destroyed. The problem does not just reside with feedlots; there are also issues with the fish farming industry as well as the agriculture industry.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term “factory farming” sends shivers down one spine and creates a buzz that stirs up emotions of anger and sadness. The general public is led to believe that factory farming is the work of Satan. Animal rights groups like PETA and the Humane Society of the United States, run graphic and sometimes disturbing ad campaigns that are designed to infuriate the viewer. The truth is factory farming is not only a necessary and efficient way to farm, but it also can be viewed as a good, healthy way to farm. Factory farming allows safe and quality meat products to be available and affordable to the ever rapid growing population. The future of farming and the nutritional health of the world lie in the advancement of safety and efficiency on the factory farms.…

    • 2514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays