Preview

Supreme Court Debates: Article Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1091 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Debates: Article Analysis
"Lower Court Holding: Decision of the U.S District Court for the Northern District of California." Supreme Court Debates, a Pro & Con® Monthly. 5th ed. Vol. 13. Washington, D.C.:Congressional Digest, 2010. 11-16. Academic Search Premier [EBSCO]. Web. 19 Sept. 2015.

The article from Supreme Court Debates’ May 2010 Monthly Journal details the legal definitions of discrimination and explains standards for when First Amendment rights may be overruled. By examining “Christian Legal Society v. Martinez”, it is clearly explained that extreme viewpoints and beliefs are legal, but conduct based upon these beliefs is considered discriminatory. The article then draws on critical law history, providing cases such as “United States v. O’Brian” which
…show more content…
Schlosser, and Dana Heller Levitt. "Religious Identity and Cultural Diversity: Exploring the Relationships Between Religious Identity, Sexism, Homophobia, and Multicultural Competence." Journal of Counseling & Development 87.4 (2009):420-27. Academic Search Premier [EBSCO]. Web. 19 Sept. …show more content…
Further, Msibi suggests it may be applied within a higher educational setting to reduce discrimination. Consequently, while it may reduce sexual orientation discrimination, it also has the capacity to target racial and gender discrimination. The main obstacle remains that students are less exposed to queer theory due to a lack of academic curriculum and research. Further, LGBT students and faculty alike face delegitimization of sexual identifications, limiting contributions to further research and learning. Fellow classmates and professors perpetuate information which is inaccurate and presented with singular authority. The article definitely carries a heavy bias, as Thabo Msibi identifies within the LGBT community and has a vested interest in higher educational changes and societal perceptions to his own identity. However, Perspectives in Education is a professional, peer reviewed journal which seeks to stimulate dialogue and change within educational issues. It therefore, goes, that Msibi is corroborated by fellow peers, in order to be published within the journal. Msibi’s article may be utilized to provide background on queer theory in addition to drawing on the personal experiences of queer LGBT students within higher

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Jdt2 Task 1

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: innegan, S. (2013). Constructive Dishcarge Under Tittl VII and the ADEA. The University of Chicago Law Review, 561-562.Grace Liebermann V. Genesis Health Care - Franklin Woods Center, CCB-11-2770 (District Court of Maryland 2013).Johnson V. Lacaster-Lebabib Intermediate Unit 13, 11-cv-01598 (District Court for the Eastren District of Pennsyvania 2012).Pennsylvania State Police V. Suders, 542 US 129 (Supreme Court 2004).Religious Discrimination. (2013, 03 24). Retrieved from U.S. Equal EMployment Opportunity Commision: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/religion.cfm…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case, Zubik v. Burwll is aimed to answer multiple questions. The first question this case aims to answer is does the availability of a regulatory exemption for religious employers regarding the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate eliminate the substantial burden on those organizations’ exercise of their religious freedom? The second question this case will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines satisfy the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s demanding test for overriding religious objections? Last, the third question this court will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when the government has not proven that the guidelines…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One source must be from an approved website (listed above) and the other source from an electronic database (Gale Virtual Reference Library) or resource book.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | L.O. 16-1: Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it, pp. 468-470.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from September 1986, until February 2016, when he unfortunately passed away. Scalia was born in New Jersey but later moved to Queens in New York (Reilly, 2016). Scalia’s parents were both teachers, which may have been why he was valedictorian when graduating from St. Francis Xavier high school. After high school, he went to Georgetown University, where he also graduated at the top of his class, achieving the honor of valedictorian yet again (Reilly, 2016). Scalia got his bachelor’s degree in history, but wanted to further his education, so he went on to Harvard Law School, where he graduated again as valedictorian of his class in 1960 (Reilly, 2016). After graduating from Harvard Law, Scalia worked in a private practice for just a couple of years, only to discover he would rather be teaching as a law professor at a University, which is what he ended up doing.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Brethren, co-authored by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, is an in-depth documentary of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1975, under the leadership of Warren Burger. The book attempts to present the reader with what "really" goes on in the Supreme Court. It describes the conferences, the personality of justices, and how justice's feel toward each other, items which are generally hidden from the public. This book is comparable to a lengthy newspaper article. Written more as a source of information than of entertainment, The Brethren is the brutal truth, but not boring. The storytelling is clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "DISCRIMINATION: RIGHTS GROUPS SUE U.S. OVER 'RELIGIOUS PROFILING'." Global Information Network Apr 21 2005: 1. ProQuest. 26 Mar. 2014…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karen L. Jerman had a mortgage with Countrywide Home Loans and was contacted by the law firm Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, on behalf of Country Wide, seeking a foreclosure on Jerman’s property.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compelling Interest Test

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How much freedom is too much freedom? This is the question that has been debated for decades regarding religious freedom and state actions. With the rise of the regulatory state beginning in the 1940’s and the New Deal, the government has consistently come in conflict with religious freedom. Issues such as religious garb, zoning laws, unemployment benefits, military draft accommodations, religion in the public square, LGBT discrimination, and birth control are just some of the many issues that have arisen. To accommodate religious individuals in the face of generally applicable laws, the Supreme Court devised the Compelling Interest Test. The Compelling Interest Test can best be defined as “the state may justify an inroad on religious liberty…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of the federal government in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights in the period 1865-1992…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court was presented with the case of Fischer vs. The University of Texas where Abigail Fisher was suing the University for discrimination in their affirmative action based admissions process. The Supreme Court voted 7-1 and ruled to send the case back to the lower courts for further review and put off making any final decisions to change the U.S. policy on affirmative action, a “longstanding but fragile societal compromise, one that forbids quotas but allows using race as one factor among many in the admissions process” (Laptik). Both articles discussed in length the constitutionality of the race-based admissions process as well as explaining the Supreme Court’s position on the matter. The justices made statements that explained that the admissions programs must be subject to strict scrutiny where the it can be determined that classification based on gender, race and ethnicity occurs for the sole purpose of creating a diverse student population. The programs that use affirmative action in public universities are being scrutinized to ensure that their methods are a means to an end and serve to create diversity only. This issue will come before the Supreme Court again in the future and there will most likely be a more permanent ruling on the matter.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Interview

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chief Justice Roy Moore, of the State of Alabama’s Supreme Court, informed state probate judges not to issue any more marriage license to members of the same-sex than it already has which defied an order given by a federal judge. Moore is also known as the “Ten Commandments judge” (Berman, 2014) in which he defied a federal judge’s order to move the Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building. Recently, the state of Alabama went from a marriage equality state to one where most same-sex couples cannot get married (Terkel, 2014). This author sat down to interview State Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore and get his opinion on the features of the court system in which he practices.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays