Preview

Court System Interview

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1334 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Court System Interview
Court Systems Interview
G.M.
University of Phoenix
AJS/504
June 22, 2015
William Miller

Court Systems Interview When the United States Constitution was established, the founding fathers devised the core of the court system that is present in today’s society. The state and federal government each have a version of a Supreme Court which is typically led by a Chief Justice. The states level Supreme Court Justice governs the issues that pertains to the citizens within the respective state. These individuals will also take part in hearings or proceedings that impact of law of the state and hear constitutional cases with regards to the state. On the federal side, a Supreme Court Chief Justice will operates more on a national level, ruling over cases that such as states taking one another to court. The federal court has authority over anything to do with the United States Constitution and this paper will interview State Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on the current issue of same-sex marriage that was recently passed for the state of Alabama.
Chief Justice Roy Moore, of the State of Alabama’s Supreme Court, informed state probate judges not to issue any more marriage license to members of the same-sex than it already has which defied an order given by a federal judge. Moore is also known as the “Ten Commandments judge” (Berman, 2014) in which he defied a federal judge’s order to move the Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building. Recently, the state of Alabama went from a marriage equality state to one where most same-sex couples cannot get married (Terkel, 2014). This author sat down to interview State Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore and get his opinion on the features of the court system in which he practices.
The first question posed to Chief Justice Moore was “Who is Roy Moore?”. Moore answered saying that he is an Army veteran (military police company commander in Vietnam), a father, and a grandfather. A



References: Berman, M. (2014). Who is Ray Moore? The Judge at the Center of Alabama’s Muddled Gay Marriage Situation. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/02/09/who-is-roy-moore-the-judge-at-the-center-of-alabamas-muddled-gay-marriage-situation/ Cornell University (n.d.). U.S. Constitution: Article VI. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi Eastman, J.C. (2015). Precedent: A Defense of Judge Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court. The Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse. Retrieved from http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/03/14627/ Elliott, D. (2015). Federal Judge May Clarify Confusion in Ala. Gay Marriage Standoff. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2015/02/12/385646944/federal-judge-may-clarify-confusion-in-ala-same-sex-marriage-standoff Kelly, M. (n.d.) What is the role of the Chief Justice? About Education. Retrieved from http://americanhistory.about.com/od/supremecourtcases/f/chief_justice.htm Terkel, A. (2014). Alabama Counties Stop Issuing Marriage Licenses To Same-Sex Couples. Huff Post Politics. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/04/alabama-marriage_n_6801412.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ted Cruz has been so far only GOP candidate to animadvert the same-sex court ruling sternly enough to ignite the social conservatives. While all other GOP candidates showed controlled reaction on the law, Cruz tears the court ruling down and takes the opposition of same-sex marriage as ‘front and center’ of his presidential election campaign. Most of the GOP candidates have criticized the law but ended up obeying it ‘showing respect’ to the law except for Cruz, who has initiated campaigning against same-sex marriage ruling in Iowa. He also has excoriated the court for upholding Obamacare. He suggests that the court has overstepped its bounds.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Brethren Sparknotes

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Brethren is a book about the evolution of the Burger Court during the years of 1969 to 1976. The Brethren takes readers inside the court for a fascinating view of how things really work: how justices build majorities for their points of view and, occasionally, how they lose them; how the chief justice can use his power to assign cases to impress their philosophy on the final decision; and the unique role played by the law clerks. This book is a balanced account of the inner workings of the Supreme Court from 1969 to 1976, the first seven years of Warren Burger's tenure as Chief Justice. The storytelling is also clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes the bias forgivable. It describes the decision…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Spann, Girardeau A. Race against the Court: Supreme Court and Minorities in Contemporary America. New York: New York University Press, 1993.…

    • 3133 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ackerman, David M., and Kimberly D. Jones. The Law of Church and State in the Supreme…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Johnnie Cochran

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Merida, Kevin. "Johnnie Cochran, the Attorney On the People 's Defense Team." Washington Post. N.p., 31 Mar. 2005. Web.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same-sex marriage is now legal across all US states due to a recent ruling from the Supreme Court of America (reference). Judicial review is the authority of a court to repeal unconstitutional government laws and actions (textbook reference). Theoretically, judicial review is there to “protect[] the constitutional rights of individuals” from arbitrary powers of the government. In practice, the court’s ability to do that varies between countries based on their constitutions. Some courts are able to strike down legislations while others can only criticize them. However, there have been debates about how judicial review is undemocratic in nature. This paper aims to argue for the importance of judicial review by further analyzing its characteristics…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: State Courts Systems. (2004-2007). Retrieved August 29, 2011, from "court system in the United States: State Court Systems." The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia.: 29 Aug. 2011 <http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0857620.html>.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clarence Thomas

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In the annals of American history, this name has risen to the forefront of noted Supreme Court Justices and has become synonymous with the ideals and philosophies of uncompromising conservatives. Undeniably, the same name also congers thoughts of hypocrisy, desertion, and self-denial toward one of America 's most divisive and enigmatic political figures. Since his nomination by President George H. Bush to the United States Supreme Court, Justice Thomas has been inundated with criticism by those who oppose his expressed jurisprudence and with praises by those who follow his hard-nosed, unapologetic style of governance in his role as America 's second African-American Supreme Court Justice.…

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hollingsworth V. Perry

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marissa Bair Mr. Turcotte AP US History 6 December 2012 Hollingsworth v. Perry 1. In February of 2004 the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom and other city officials began distributing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples in the city of San Francisco, California. In March of the same year, the County of San Francisco ordered the halt of marriages, pending court review. On March 29th, the San Francisco Superior Court declared San Francisco’s issuing of same-sex marriage licenses illegal. Multiple state Supreme Court hearings were held on the legality of the same-sex marriages in the spring of 2004. San Francisco filed its own lawsuit against the state of California in order to have its case heard. In August, the state Supreme Court ruled the same-sex marriages performed in San Francisco violated authority and state law. The court deemed all same-sex marriages performed to be null. The next year, in March of 2005, Richard Kramer, the trial judge of In re Marriage Cases (2008) reported that California’s ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. They said marriage was a fundamental right that cannot be discriminated against based on sexual orientation. The next month, California legalized same-sex marriage on June 16th, 2008. Less than five months later, the marriages were stopped by the passing of Proposition 8, which provided that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid in recognized in California.” This overturned the California Supreme Court’s ruling of In re Marriage Case that same-sex couples have the constitutional right to marry. Same-sex marriages in California…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anthony Lewis has always held his head high where it has concerned the American Judiciary – Lewis’ praise for the American judiciary is arguably sensible and thorough in its worthy aspect. Not only does he excel as a reporter and a columnist at the New York Times, but where it concerns his authorship he has been equally exceptional in his craft. In his latest book, “Freedom for the Thought That We Hate” Lewis has the same heroic view of the American Judiciary to portray and he does it with his usual flair, with his typical – subtle, but very much inherent – admiration for the Judiciary, and for everything that he stands for. Similar to his incomparable, thorough, and critical account of the 1963 Supreme Court Case, Lewis does not lag in sending…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Encyclopedia, T. C. (2012). Court System In the United States - The Federal Court System. New York: Columbia University Press.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is traditionally viewed as the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife. However, what happens when those two people are two men or two women? This topic of gay marriage has been a major issue in the United States over the past few years. It has raised several political debates as well as other minor arguments throughout the United States and around the world. Until recently, homosexual couples in the United States were allowed to marry. Recently, a series of events change the standing of homosexual marriages in the United States. The Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas repealed a Texas law that made sodomy a crime in order to affirm the privacy rights of homosexuals. In November 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the state cannot deny marriage licenses to homosexual couples. Following the Massachusetts decision, more gay marriages occurred publicly across the nation from San Francisco to New York. President George W. Bush responded to these activities by urging Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages. On May 17, 2004, Massachusetts became the first state to grant legalized same-sex marriages.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This case note will examine the 1967 landmark Supreme Court case of Loving v. Virginia. The Loving v. Virginia case touched on constitutional principles including equality, federalism, and liberty. Just over 30 years ago, it was a crime for interracial couples in Virginia to marry, or to live as husband and wife. Prior to the 1967 case of Loving v. Virginia, many states had laws that banned the intermarriage of whites with black or other minorities. The United States has a long history of the existence of anti-miscegenation laws that forbid interracial marriage. The case presents the constitutional question whether a statutory scheme adopted by the State of Virginia to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classifications violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The right that is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, contains the right to be treated the same, legally, as others in the same situation. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution forbids states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws . The equal protection jurisprudence in the United States has evolved greatly. Well-known cases covering the Equal Protection Clause are Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, considering the de-segregation of public schools and Korematsu v. United States in 1944, when the Court first articulated a strict scrutiny standard for laws based on race-based distinctions. This strict scrutiny standard was applied again in the Loving v. Virginia case in 1967. In 1967, the Supreme Court’s had to decide if these anti-miscegenation statutes were unconstitutional. The Supreme Court declared, in a unanimous decision, Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute, the "Racial…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays