Preview

Supreme Court Candidate Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Candidate Essay
The roles of either the Chief Justice of the United States or the associates under him are very important and extremely demanding positions. These are the people who speak for the judicial branch of the federal government and the Chief Justice serves as the chief administrative officer for the federal courts. The Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the United States. Justices of this court are positions that are needed for the health of the government and nation, so it common for innumerable requirements and qualities to be wanted by the general public and placed upon any nominees striving to be on it. This, however, is no excuse for a nominee to act as they please under the guise that they cannot please everyone. It is understandable that they will never be able to meet every person's perceptions of what a 'proper' supreme court nominee should be like, but I believe each nominee should fulfill the basic requirements of integrity, service before themselves, excellence in their duties and to have a love for their position and country. A nominee undoubtedly needs the integrity to function properly in a position in the Supreme Court. As a member of the court, they will …show more content…
We need Justices in the courts to put their jobs and the needs of the people before themselves and any of their personal biases. How could a Justice rule accurately to what the people need and what is fair if they do not listen to what is being needed or even outright reject something only on the grounds that their personal beliefs deem it wrong? If a Justice was allowed to do this, black rights would never have been established, the rights for gays to get married would never have passed and women may have never been able to vote or be paid accordingly. Because of issues such as these, we need someone who puts their duties before all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This fact is solidly undisputable because when money and political influence are used in selecting leaders of any society, then it implies that there are those who will be left out of the decision-making process because of the class they belong or social status to which they are categorized. For full inclusion of people in leadership processes, justice and truth must always prevail (Mott, 49). Therefore, concerning the case of Texas judge selection criterion, it is arguably not the best practice due to a multiplicity of reasons that have been highlighted herein. Consequently, necessary modifications need to be carried out that are in line with the suggestions of this paper for the sole rationale of achieving inclusivity, an open display of service delivery as well as transparency (Maxwell,…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He served for four years in the U.S. Court of Appeals before being nominated to the United States Supreme Court. This nomination was brought about by President Ronald Regan when Justice William Rehnquist moved up to the position of Chief Justice. Justice Scalia was confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is a committee of 18 members of the United States Senate. Their jobs consist of conducting hearings before the Senate votes on the confirmation of federal judges, which also includes the confirmation of Supreme Court Justices; Justice Scalia was confirmed by the members and took his seat on September 26,…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the past few weeks, I’ve been talking to a range of people who have worked with her, nearly all of them former law clerks for other judges on the Second Circuit or former federal prosecutors in New York. Most are Democrats and all of them want President Obama to appoint a judicial star of the highest intellectual caliber who has the potential to change the direction of the court. Nearly all of them acknowledged that Sotomayor is a presumptive front-runner, but nearly none of them raved about her. They expressed questions about her temperament, her judicial craftsmanship, and most of all, her ability to provide an intellectual counterweight to the conservative justices, as well as a clear liberal…

    • 3123 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law. Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today ' s decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year ' s Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation ' s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” Through this statement it is obvious that Justice Stevens believes that the Federal Courts has no place in interfering on state voter laws and that the decision that was made by the majority of US Supreme Court Justices will negatively influence the perception of the Supreme Court. Justice Stevens is supported by Justice Breyer: “…the Court is not acting to vindicate a fundamental constitutional principle, such as the need to protect a basic human liberty. No other strong reason to act is present. Congressional statutes tend to obviate the need. And, above all, in this highly politicized matter, the appearance of a split decision runs the risk of undermining the public ' s confidence in the Court itself. That confidence is a public treasure. It has…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Senate Reparations

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Nevertheless, the High Court’s appointment system has faced numerous reform proposals and scrutiny since the early 1990s. Arguably, if Australia adopts a similar mechanism to Senate confirmations, the public law principles of judicial independence and impartiality, the separation of powers and public confidence under the rule of law would be better served. However, the United States’ appointment system is problematic because the possibility of over-politicisation by the Senate means these values may not be adequately protected. Such views emphasise the inadequacy of Senate Confirmations and express the need for Australia to adopt other viable…

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Current Power of the Branches of Our Federal Government An Opinion Brandon Parrish Fairmont State University…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Judicial Branch

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamilton argues in the federalist No. 78, which branches of government, specifically the judicial branch and how it’s the weakest branch of government. Hamilton believes that the Judicial branch only has the power to judge on laws, but does not alter the actual final decisions on what the laws people need to uphold. Hamilton recognizes that you need all three branches to make a successful government function and that the judicial branch is the least powerful of the three. The legislative branch makes the laws, executive branch enforces these laws and lastly the Judicial branch needs to understand the laws that are being put forth. Being the least dangerous branch of government it still has its checks and balances being able to hold one another to be accountable for each other, but also as a Judicial branch can keep the other branches in alignment.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    people who can understand. They use their knowledge and understanding of our laws and Constitution. However, this comes from their vast and intense experience as Justices.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many justices are approaching an age at which they can retire, and the next justices elected to the supreme court will heavily influence the U.S. for years, possibly decades. The next justices will most likely be elected according to the next president's views. However, the president should elect justice who will be best for the country as a whole, not just according to their own views. The next president must be able to think about the entire nation when electing justices. They must show leadership by listening to others, and not just…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summarize 3 (3) Supreme Court choices that you just believe have had the foremost impact on our society. offer a principle for your response.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays