Preview

Essay On Judicial Branch

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
582 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Judicial Branch
Hamilton argues in the federalist No. 78, which branches of government, specifically the judicial branch and how it’s the weakest branch of government. Hamilton believes that the Judicial branch only has the power to judge on laws, but does not alter the actual final decisions on what the laws people need to uphold. Hamilton recognizes that you need all three branches to make a successful government function and that the judicial branch is the least powerful of the three. The legislative branch makes the laws, executive branch enforces these laws and lastly the Judicial branch needs to understand the laws that are being put forth. Being the least dangerous branch of government it still has its checks and balances being able to hold one another to be accountable for each other, but also as a Judicial branch can keep the other branches in alignment.
These types of checks and balances can keep a government under control, but it can still allow for a little wiggle room which Hamilton tries to explain how each branch of government ensure the
…show more content…
For example, both executive and legislative branches have more of an influence on people and their everyday lives, whereas the judiciary branch deals with problems that are brought before them in real circumstances not situations that could occur. Executive branch, for example, is able to appoint judges to the Supreme Court and legislation can impeach a judge out of office. This type of power is not given to the judiciary branch only review the decisions that are made, even if the Judiciary branch doesn't necessarily like the decisions the Supreme Court has made over all it can ultimately not be affected by the judiciary. The stability of this power of a Supreme Court judge is to retain the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 201 Quiz

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton said that the judiciary would be the least dangerous branch of government because…

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By saying this Madison is saying that each office of government should use checks and balances to ensure that no one office is more powerful than the other. Checks and balances are the limits placed on the branches of a government by allowing each branch the right to amend or void the acts of another branch. Madison stated that the three branches should not be so separated that the have no control over each other (Madison Document C). Each branch had a way of watching over the other branch. The legislative branch can control the judicial branch by impeaching a judge (Document C). Also the judicial branch can control the legislative branch by declaring laws unconstitutional. As the examples above show, each branch does have a way of keeping the other branch from becoming too powerful and that is how checks and balances guarded against…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three branches of government and have been set in place and authorized to question the actions and decisions of the other so that not one action can be carried out without the utmost research and support of the other branch or branches. These…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three branches in the government were set up to be strong. The branches consist of a Legislative branch, Executive branch, and lastly a Judicial branch. First, we have the Legislative branch which is the system of representation the colonist created, they make the laws for our country. Next, we have the Executive branch which has the president, vice president, cabinet, and the executive agencies, and they make sure that the nation follows its laws. Lastly we have the Judicial branch and they are responsible for deciding if the laws are enacted by congress, or in line with the constitution.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton said, “He wanted a strong federal government”(Doc 1). The benefits of having a federal government was that the country would have a stronger say over policies than States. Hamilton know that if we had a federal government(Doc 1). If states had power and we needed to apply a law/act for the country it would be harder to apply rather than if we had a federal government. Hamilton's idea for having a federal government is a great idea that would give the country more power and a stronger say over laws/acts. Hamilton’s idea to have a strong federal government is another of his many great ideas to improve the…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, the Executive Branch can veto bills from the Legislative Branch, who can then in turn vote to override the veto with a majority approval. The Judicial Branch may review laws proposed by either of the other branches and declare them unconstitutional if applicable. Judicial power is balanced by the act of appointment into position by the other two branches of government. Should a representative of the judicial branch overexert their influence their appointment may be removed. (congressforkids.net,…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton argued that what the Constitution didn’t forbid, it permitted. He invokes the clause of the Constitution that Congress may pass any laws “necessary and proper” to carry out the powers vested in the various government agencies. He argues that the government was explicitly empowered to collect taxes and regulate trade and in carrying out these basic functions, a national bank was both “proper” and “necessary.” Hamilton and his followers believed in a “loose” or “broad” interpretation of the Constitution, which evolved the theory of “loose construction” by invoking the “elastic clause” of the Constitution.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example is with the fact that the Supreme Court can rule laws unconstitutional by using the power of judicial review. Additionally, the supreme court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. On the other side, Judges can be impeached by congress and removed from the bench and have its decisions overturned as well. Furthermore, the executive branch not the judicial branch has the power to appoint judges to the supreme court. With this in mind, in times of conflict the President has the power to pardon individuals convicted of crimes. As can be seen, the Judicial branch consists of numerous checks and balances that limit its power and the power of other branches.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This helps to prevent one branch from becoming more powerful than another. Each branch has their own responsibilities and role in government. The three branches are the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. The legislative branch is in charge of making laws for our country. The executive branch of government makes sure that the laws of the United States are obeyed. This is where the president comes in also. Lastly, the judicial branch is made up of the court system. Courts decide arguments about laws, how they are applied, and whether they break the rules of the Constitution or not. The Legislative branch is made up by Congress which includes the House of Representatives and the Senate. The executive branch includes the president and vice president. Lastly, the Judicial Court includes the Supreme Court. Each of these branches are important to the constitution and play a major…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton Implied Powers

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The principle of implied powers was that the government possessed the authority to make any laws "necessary and proper" to help and protect the American people. Hamilton felt these implied powers were necessary to run an efficient government because it would protect the people from corruption. He felt that the only way for a government to remain stable is for it to be allowed the flexibility to change and make adjustments with the times. In 1791 the bill for the development of a national bank was passed. The only problem with the issue of implied powers was that no one knew quite where the government would draw the line.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1” by voicing his beliefs that the U.S. will only survive with the creation of a Constitution. Without it, the country will not grow nor become the independent nation it strives to be, “The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the union, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the father of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world” (Hamilton). Hamilton displays that the nation will only stand with a Constitution and it is the obligation of its citizens to form a government based on reason. Each society will choose to create a government that derives from fact or from force. Hamilton works to depict that the people of the United States are unlike any of their predecessors due to the ability to form a country that stems from logic and reason, “[T]o decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force” (Hamilton). It is due to their unique and crucial position which enables them to make decisions from reason, that the U.S. citizens must recount all information from both sides of the governmental…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison believed that the government powers must be divided into separate areas and that each part should have a limited amount of power and control. James Madison felt this was important for many reasons, one he refers to in this quote, "If men were all angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."…

    • 266 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution created an ingenious way to avoid tyranny of one branch over other branches, with a system of checks and balances. James Madison wrote in the Federalist Paper”…the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as they may be a check on…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judiciary Branch

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The judiciary branch of the United States’ government is comprised of a system of courts, on both federal and state levels, which are used to bring justice to cases between citizens of the States. The power of judicial review gives the courts the authority “to review and, if necessary, declare actions of the legislative and executive branches invalid or unconstitutional” (Ginsberg). It’s interesting that the branch that works to uphold the laws of the U.S. Constitution is sometimes viewed as the “least dangerous branch” of our Government. Referring to writings such as Federalist 78 (by Alexander Hamilton) and Brutus 12 (by James Madison), clears up exactly what the judiciary was set up for, why it is important to have in our Government system, and how it might affect the other branches, the executive and legislative. It is clear while reading the works that the two writers have opposing views. Therefore, it is crucial to study both works and compare their ideas to our current Judiciary to understand how our country has undergone changes within the system.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays