Preview

Support Strong Paternalism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
152 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Support Strong Paternalism
Madeline,
I really enjoyed reading your forum and after reading it I agree with what you had to say on utilitarianism. Both utilitarians would support weak paternalism if a patient was terminally ill and couldn’t decide what kind of treatment they needed to have. This is similar to what I stated in my forum post, I think that if the patient can not make the best decision for themselves then the doctor makes the best decision for them. I also agree that an act utilitarian would be most likely to support strong paternalism because an act utilitarian is a person who would make the most ethical action that is possible and that action will benefit the people. Overall I really liked the example that you used for the act utilitarian, it truly shows

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Letter

    • 875 Words
    • 1 Page

    the reasoning for the debate on wether to legalize assisted suicide or not stems from individual interpretation of the…

    • 875 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our lives are littered with problems, some have simple solutions but many especially the ones that pertain to our health or to the health of our families are extremely difficult to solve. Health is the most important thing that someone possesses, or in the words of Ghandi “It is health that is real wealth not pieces of gold and silver.” So when one has to make a decision about wealth they have the liberty to lose some, but when deciding about one’s health no one wants to lose some. The solution to such a sensitive problem is not as easy as choosing between A and B, there is far more to it! Many times an option that may be beneficial to an individual is not entirely accessible, affordable, or logical, so sacrifices have to be made! This is where such problems become extremely difficult to solve. Does one make a decision that benefits them or everyone as a whole? Does one accept and respect the decision made by a health care practitioner, or does one decide on their own? Furthermore, looking back at what happened in Dublin twelve years ago, can one allow a parent to deny their child access to the MMR vaccine, the lack of which happened to be the root cause in the case leaving three infants deceased? This paper will aim to justify that it is ethically not permissible for a guardian to refuse the MMR vaccine for their child, as it not only poses a risk for the child alone but also for all susceptible children in the community. This justification will be reinforced using two ethical theories that nullify the refusal of administration of the vaccine by a guardian, the first theory that will be exhausted will be Act Utilitarianism and further reinforced using W.D. Ross’s Ethical Pluralism theory.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meaning that people should do the right thing by helping people when they need help and to have hope for them. In protector argument the kid needed surgery but the surgery was life threating to do, but there was a little chance that kid would have survive if you gave him hope. Utilitarian say that happiness is the basis of moral judgments and feelings. So do the things that makes you happy. And should act and hope for the best, in the situation with the little boy parents and the doctor should take the best decision for the little kid. Utilitarianism is typically based on hedonism. Hedonist argue that the highest goal that people could have is pleasure, which is the only worthwhile goal. I think that hedonist fall under euthanizer because both believe that pain is bad and nobody should suffer the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Joseph, S., & Letendre, C. (2014). Health Care Decision Making. New Bioethics, 20(2), 174-185. doi:10.1179/2050287714Z.00000000051…

    • 2081 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    But then again, he is just trying to challenge the distinction and he is successful at it. It makes me think why should anyone suffer a slow painful death? In the end both cause the death of someone. Active euthanasia would be much more “compassionate.” In my opinion, we see euthanasia as a brutal killing because we are more exposed to the terrible things shown by the media, but we are not as familiar with the characteristics of letting someone die. Thus, we always think killing is worst. I believe that active euthanasia should be a choice and it is not wrong. A terminally ill patient should be able to decide his fate to end his life or continue suffering. Of course, when the patient is not able to make decisions it should be the guardian’s right to do it. It is not easy to make such decision, but the option should be…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    To save an individual or to not save an individual, this is the question at hand. Many uninformed Americans are up in arms over the notion of the government forcing the elderly Medicare patient to make an advanced directive. Healthcare reform as a whole has been a highly debated topic as it should be, but there are many aspects of the new healthcare reform bill that have their own energized debate. An advanced directive is one of them, but the debate should not prey upon people’s most basic fears. Up until now the topic of advanced directives had taken a back seat in the news. Prior to the healthcare reform bill, the last time advanced directives had so much media attention was the Terri Schiavo case. Wikipedia defined the Terri Schiavo case as a seven-year long legal case that revolved around whether Terri Schiavo, diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) for several years should be disconnected from life support. Fierce critics and avid supporters have all stated their opinions in one form or another. The uninformed public is left to decide, who’s right and who’s wrong. I intend to explain each side, give real life examples, and educate my reader so they can decide for themselves.…

    • 2713 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two different forms of utilitarianism are described in our text. The first is called act utilitarianism. According to Shaw and Barry, act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected (p.60).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We have both chosen the three exact same ethical theories. The reason you gave about why these theories are important really opened my mind. It’s true that decisions on anything are indeed very mental, and there are many variables that we need to consider as future health professionals. The factors of outcomes, established standards, and norms of different cultures are ones that definitely should not be disregarded personally. I absolutely agree with you that nurses should think about how their decisions can affect the level of the patient’s pain. I believe that nurses should be open to alternatives and use their best judgment to figure out what would ease the patient’s suffering the most while staying within the legal limits like you mentioned.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asymmetric Paternalism

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To begin to understand this article we must first define what the authors mean by asymmetric paternalism. According to the Oxford Dictionary, asymmetric is without symmetry or not divided equally. The definition of paternalism states that it is behaving in a paternal way or limiting freedom and responsibility by well-meant regulations. The authors state that the paternal regulations discussed are those developed on an individual basis. The regulations are designed so that those that are uneducated in a particular area are greatly benefited by the regulations, and those whom are already educated, or fully rational, are not affected by the regulation.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paternalism

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page

    There are many interpretations of the meaning of paternalism. These thoughts may be justified by the various considerations of a society’s sets of values and virtues. The commonly accepted idea of what paternalism means involves supportive agents within society who infringe on an individual’s freedom for his/her benefit when the individuals of interest would prefer not to be treated this way. When discussed from a view based on cultural expectations and spiritual growth, paternalism turns into a challenge. It requires the rationality of the paternalistic figures and the prior consent given by the individual of interest for the figures to decide what best benefits the individual can have while limiting the harm done and taking away some of…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The parenting methods among African-American families generally consist high levels of negativity in the general household which depends on many factors. One of them is the sex of the children. It is found that these parents display high levels of negativity authority over their male children compared to their female children. These families tend to favor a disciplinarian approach while raising a child. A significantly large number of African-American mothers are authoritarian when parenting. A family’s social and economic status plays an important role in deciding the approach taken for parenting. This is done to prepare them for the challenges that they may face, the likes of racism, discrimination and poverty. The African-American way of child-rearing is strongly influenced by religious beliefs when compared to a White-American child-rearing. Many activities such as Bible camp, church choir, Sunday school and Bible study were very prominent and motivated among these families compared to activities such as a soccer and piano lessons in white families.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abelson, Reed. (February 5, 2013). Health Insurance Companies Get in Shape for 2014. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/business/florida-blue-and-other-health-insurers-prepare-for-new-regulations.html?_r=0…

    • 5114 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authoritarian Parenting

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Parenting style has a big impact on how children develop into adults, and there are important implications for their future success. Here are the four main parenting styles and their implications for rearing successful children and leaders.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this scenario, a doctor has five patients with a rare blood type who all need different transplants, he then finds a healthy individual whose organs would save the lives of the five patients. This argument correctly predicts that many individuals would be hesitant about making the choice that leads to the best outcome. That is, most people would find it hard to justify killing a healthy patient, even if it is to save five sick patients despite it being the right choice. The reluctance, dissenters would argue, proves that there are times when a utilitarian moral code would not be best. This however is a false assumption. This argument is based on the premise that because we would have a hard time justifying it, it must be false yet that is not true. What stands in the person’s way is not ethics, in fact by the utilitarianist view it’d be unethical not to kill the first man, rather the problem lays in the social construct of our…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays