To conclude, the use of technology is a great threat while driving since the amount of fatalities is…
Analysis and response of “Driverless Cars: Safer Perhaps, but Professor Warns of Privacy Risks” “Driverless Cars: Safer Perhaps, but Professor Warns of Privacy Risks” by Michael McGowan, seeks to convince the reader that regulations for driverless cars should be focusing on the information they gather and who can use it. McGowan purposely uses language that can be easily understood by an audience of non-experts, while still being professional and sophisticated. He also uses terms like “gold mine” and “sleeper issue” to stimulate intrigue at the beginning to draw in readers. McGowan’s choice to quote experts in law and technology and choice to keep the article focused on facts improves his overall credibility. Throughout the article he focuses…
Early 2015, Google has gotten closer to finish their final idea. In the near future time, many cars are going able to drive on their own without human control. This reflects our present day society because many people are scared to drive like me, and it can be beneficial for blind people to use the Google car, to get to places by just using their voice rather than their eyes that they don't have. The reason the author wrote this article because she is stating that car technology has been growing, and sooner or later, other industries are going to make driverless…
Senior transportation editor at Business Insider, Cadie Thompson, in her article, The 3 Biggest Ways Self-Driving Cars Will Improve our Lives, published in June 2016, addresses the topic of driverless cars and argues that they will have an overall positive impact on our world. Thompson supports her claim by utilizing a lot of data and statistics to back up her statements, and also by establishing her credibility through her use of language. The author’s overall purpose is to discuss the benefits of driverless cars in order to make the audience more aware and open to this topic. Thompson employs a scientific tone in her article in order to emphasize the ideas presented.…
An American writer and futurist, Alvin Toffler once said, “Our technological powers increase, but the side effects and potential hazards also escalate.” What Toffler is inferring is that in this 21st Century, humans are born into a world full of wonderful gadgets. But behind all these wonderful gadgets lies some pretty scary effects to it. With the knowledge of knowing that there is a high possibility of getting into a car accident; teens nowadays, including adults, use their phones while driving. Since the roads humans drive on everyday are saturated with ignorant use of cellphones, the risk of one's life and the pedestrians life is summiting. Nowadays, humans think that they can multitask, but they are wrong. Quite a lot of deaths and road…
The claim of this passage is distracted driving is a dangerous thing, and anybody can be involved in a wreck.…
Bainwol argues that because these built-in systems allow the phone to connect to the system, there is no need for a driver to even have their phone anywhere in sight. He boldly states that even if it is illegal for Americans to use their phone while they drive, they are going to continue to do so. From these arguments he concludes that the best way companies will be able to reduce the traffic fatality rate is to allow Americans to continue to have technology available to them while in the car. At the same time the companies need to effectively persuade them to only use technology that is provided in the car’s system. Reynolds takes an opposite stance by saying that the risk of crashing is still going to be four times more likely if automakers allow consumers to continue to use technology like they are already doing. He parallels this issue with another issue on smoking in which adding filters to cigarettes does not make cigarette smoking safe. This example aids in solidifying his argument that “impairment is impairment”, whether a driver has access to technology through a hand-held device or a built-in…
In the article “PRO/CON: Cars that drive themselves could soon become the norm” by Newsela staff it states that “They also have problems figuring out when objects such as bits of paper garbage are harmless, so they may swerve for no reason.” This evidence illustrates that driverless cars isn’t such a good idea because it can cause accidents and cause people to get hurt.…
Picture the streets completely filled with cars, not moving, going nowhere; an endless standstill of traffic. Driverless cars aren’t all they’re cracked up to be, they can and will cause problems. If driverless cars take over then laws will need to be rewritten, new possibile insurance matters occur, and traffic will increase causing longer commutes.…
Driverless cars are stupid. One of the reasons i'm against driverless cars is because i want to be able to drive my car and not be lazy. Another reason is that what if the car stops working and the brakes dont work and the car keeps going and crashes.…
Driverless cars are just not safe enough for people to be in without worrying about crashing or going to the wrong place. One reason is the technology may not be safe enough for people to be in especially little kids because the car might not be safe enough for kids because the car might be going way too fast or just be plain dumb and crash.…
Autonomous cars have many applications a driver should always be capable of taking over as a safety measure. Putting too much faith into self-driving vehicles will cause people to be less alert they themselves may depend too highly on the vehicle's decision making putting themselves at risk. The authors of a Gale opposing viewpoints article made it known that “At a 2013 technology conference in Las Vegas, researchers demonstrated how the computers in driverless cars could be hacked to making them drive erratically and dangerously. “These virus’ are capable of taking over a car's control system wreaking havoc on the road at any moment. As stated by Zeller “the virus’ supposedly enter the cars over the Bluetooth wireless link that lets drivers use their cellphones to carry on hands-free conversations through the cars' microphones and speakers.” These new devices are flawed misleading car buyers into seeing these system as an improvement reducing the risk while at the same time providing a path to put yourselves in harm’s…
Self-driving cars would elevate the already serious effects of terrorists. Driverless cars would make it possible for the car to be loaded with explosives and used as a moving bomb or to automatically drive and cause a serious crash because they could be hacked and are not human controlled (Goodman). Safety is always a major concern with cars, whether they are driverless or not. Driverless cars would not be efficient because they could do more harm than help.…
The Technology world is changing everyday; especially with cars. People are making a way to make cars driverless. Driverless cars are not the best cars for many reasons in my opinion. For example, they cost too much, they are not safe, and they bring out too many legal issues.…
Firstly, autonomous vehicle control can increase the flow of traffic and make transportation far more efficient.[2] While few fully autonomous vehicles have actually been utilized and tested in the real world, it is a known fact that they have the potential to increase the safety and productivity of the road. The elimination of bottlenecking and traffic as a whole can enable cities to repurpose land previously used for multilane highways or roads. This would change the urban landscape entirely, and allow for more nature friendly parks and recreation centers to be constructed. However, self driving technology is also met with significant skepticism as moral and safety issues arise. The potential for fatal car accidents and detrimental injuries isn’t too uncommon for the self driving car because often it’s sensors aren’t precise enough to accurately identify or measure a given obstacle.[3] Of course, as one could predict, pushing 70mph on a highway and running head first into a tree doesn’t exactly have a positive outlook for those involved. Also, there is an aspect of losing blue collar jobs as computers begin to replace them. The trucking industry is worth nearly $700-billion , and one third of that money goes to paying for the drivers, meaning that replacing them using computers would be economically ideal for participating businesses.[4] Nearly 1.7 million blue collar truck drivers have the potential to lose their jobs because of the implementation of self driving…