Summary Of Exodus By Paul Collinss

Throughout Exodus by Paul Collins, he draws a clear outline of what occurs if a country restricts migration or if they encourage it. He holds a clear stance that migration is more of an economic than a political concern (Collin, 12). Simplifying the subject, Collins links peoples’ migration to the diaspora. The volume of people who are coming into a country and the more acquaintances they have there will lead them to interact less with the natives (87). There is the intellectual merit behind the claims that Collins makes. His views are based on factual data and evidence that he provides through examples of case scenarios that have occurred. By Collins stating that there should not be an open border, is a strong pull against liberal policy ideas. Economically, there is a middle ground that needs to be found. If there are too many people moving in or out of a country, this will hurt the economy. There is a steady flow that needs to be managed.
If people are immigrating into a country that is more wealthy than their country of origin, it will affect those who were left behind. This is due to the fact that they are not physically there. The financial help that they are giving can take a while to be sent. Political issues are brought up due to the fact that there are migrants who comes from a country that has a different political system and values (187). In more wealthy countries there is a higher chance to make money given that there is a better prospect of income. When looking at diasporas, it can be seen that when the society model is more functional, there could be an increase in the absorption of ideas (221). However, diasporas tend to be politically negative in the sense that it is not forward thinking. These tend to be more reflections upon what had happened than what is happening. If this information is not able to be retained and utilized in an efficient manner, than it does not do anything