Preview

Substantive Due Process Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1009 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Substantive Due Process Case Study
Focus on Federal Rules.
Due Process
I think that substantive due process is more relevant to this discussion as it applies the fifth and fourteenth amendments. Substantive due process is a doctrine that requires all government intrusions into individual rights and liberties shall be fair and reasonable. Further, it must be to further a legitimate governmental interest. This doctrine (not law) constrains certain actions by law enforcement, prosecutors and judges. .

Evidence
Under 46 CFR 201.136 - Evidence admissible, evidence presented to the court must be relevant, material to the case, reliable and probative. In addition, evidence may not be unduly repetitious, cumulative, irrelevant or immaterial. .
Relevant Evidence …show more content…
Weeks was arrested without a warrant at the Union Station in Kansas City, Missouri. Officers entered his household with the help of a neighbor and searched his residence without obtaining a search warrant.
What is the evidence that is relevant, reliable or competent?

Weeks, the defendant, stated that a warrant was not obtained and violated his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights as guaranteed by the Constitution. Weeks’ argument was that the evidence was obtained illegally, should be returned to his possession and that the evidence should not be used against him in court.
The evidence was the papers discovered by the US Marshalls without being given a warrant to search his premises. Even though the defendant, Weeks, submitted timely requests to retrieve his property, the court denied his petition and used the evidence against him.
While the papers seized from the defendant’s residence were relevant as he was charged with fraud and reliable as they had his name on them, the evidence was ruled incompetent on the basis that the defendant’s constitutional rights were violated. Weeks’ conviction was ultimately overturned or reversed on that basis. …show more content…
(nd). Incorporation Doctrine . Retrieved from The Free Dictionary: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Incorporation+Doctrine
Justia. (nd). Justia Us Supreme Court Center. Retrieved from Justia: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/232/383/case.html
Legal Information, I. (nd). Brady Rule . Retrieved from Cornell University Law School : http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule
Legal Information, I. (nd). Competent Evidence. Retrieved from Cornell University Law School: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/competent_evidence
Legal Information, I. (nd). Legal Information Institute . Retrieved from Cornell University Law School: http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/46/201.136
Legal Information, I. (nd). Rule 11. Pleas. Retrieved from Cornell University Law School: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11
Legal Information, I. (nd). Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence. Retrieved from Cornell University Law School : http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_401
Legal Information, I. (nd). Substantive Due Process. Retrieved from Cornell University Law School: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/substantive_due_process
Siegel, L., & Worrall, J. (2012). Introduction to Criminal Justice, 13th ed. Belmont, CA:
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Walden V. Gina Fiore Summary
    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Walden V. Gina Fiore Summary

    The next day and over the course of a month Fiore had people to make efforts from Nevada to show that the money was indeed legit and have not been earned illegally. The petitioner helped draft an affidavit to show probable cause for forfeiture of the funds. Fiore filed a lawsuit against Walden in the district court of Nevada saying Walden had no probable cause to search and seize the money and for him keeping the money even why he found out that the money was indeed legit. The District Court granted Walden motion to dismiss the case because Nevada had no jurisdiction over the case, for the seizer of the money took place in Georgia. During the appeal a divided panel ended up coming to the verdict that the search and seizer of the money could not support Nevada jurisdiction, however the Nevada had jurisdiction over the alleged false affidavit for knowing it would be a significant connection o Nevada also that delaying the funds would cause foreseeable harm which made this jurisdiction…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    R V Fraser Case Study

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supreme Court Case: Tate Vs. Colorado
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: Tate Vs. Colorado

    At the trial, Tate moved to suppress evidence obtained during the investigation. As he did this, he noticed that when Officer Benda parked behind Tate, it was an unlawful seizure according to the fourth amendment. The court concluded that he was seized with reason to believe Tate was under the influence. This caused the conclusions to be reversed and was therefore inadmissible at trail. This case was moved to the district court and this court concluded that a person could not be seized within the meaning of the fourth amendment if he is unaware of the police presence. The court also concluded that Officer Benda had reasonable suspicion to arrest Tate, thus reversing the conclusions and was therefore inadmissible at…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rochin Vs. California Year: 1952
    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Rochin Vs. California Year: 1952

    Although an arrest warrant was procured against the petitioner, he claims that the evidence seized from his home was done so without a search warrant, violating his 4th Amendment rights.…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ken Anderson Court Case Analysis
    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ken Anderson Court Case Analysis

    While he puzzled over what the prosecutor might have meant, he thought back to an argument he’d had with Davis’s boss, Williamson County district attorney Ken Anderson, who had led the prosecution’s effort. During two pretrial hearings, the lawyers had clashed over what evidence the state should, or should not, have to turn over. As Allison remembered it, state district judge William Lott had ordered Anderson to provide him with all of Wood’s reports and notes before the trial so he could determine whether they contained any “Brady material.” (The term refers to the landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. Maryland, which holds that prosecutors are required to turn over any evidence that is favorable to the accused. Failure to do so is considered to be a “Brady violation,” or a breach of a defendant’s constitutional right to due process.)…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Iowa State Penitentiary V. Williams
    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Iowa State Penitentiary V. Williams

    Decision: In 1980, Williams, seeking a writ of habeas corpus in United States District court was denied but eventually reversed by The Court of Appeals, in that the state failed to prove that the detectives acted in good faith. The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded the decision, expressing that the condition of the body and the location will be admitted as preponderance of evidence under the exclusionary…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Horton v California
    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Horton v California

    In California a police officer decided to search petitioner Horton’s home because he felt there was probable cause, the officer was searching for the stolen goods and the weapons used during the crime. The warrant given to the officer only authorized him to search for the stolen goods. As he made his way into the home of petitioner Horton he did not recover the stolen items, but found the weapons used during the crime and recovered them. When it got to the court the recovered weapons were allowed to be used against Horton, and Horton was later convicted of the crime. Since the officer testified that he did have intentions of looking for other evidence while looking for the stolen goods, the California court of appealed the conviction and then granted certiorari.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    O. J. Simpson's Exculpatory Evidence In Court
    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    O. J. Simpson's Exculpatory Evidence In Court

    Brady claim the evidence has to be material. If all the evidence is not presented, then how can…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 22 Criminal Investigation Written Assignment
    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chapter 22 Criminal Investigation Written Assignment

    Circumstantial evidence is basically evidence that has been drawn or inferred from a series of facts to draw the conclusion that a defendant is connected to a certain crime. The series of facts could just be a series of unfortunate events and do not constitute guilt. However, the more facts there are to infer from, the higher likelihood that the juror is going to infer guilt.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crj: 201 Law Enforcement
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crj: 201 Law Enforcement

    The biggest thing about this case was the creation of the "exclusionary rule". That means that the evidence that was collected and obtained was in violation of the Fourth Amendment and is now inadmissible in trial. Mr. Weeks’ house was entered while he was not there and there was not a warrant. Anything that the Marshal’s or police found there cannot be used to incriminate him. The Court claimed that without the exclusionary rule, "the protection of the Fourth Amendment… is of no value". The important thing to know about this case is…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aquiring Admissable Statements
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aquiring Admissable Statements

    In general the similarities among the four states pertain to the use of public records such as religious ones, family history, documents more than 20 years old, recorded recollections, the absence of public records, vital statistics, statements about the declarant’s present sense impressions or the declarant’s the existing mental, physical or emotional state, statements about the person’s medical condition. Arizona, Illinois and New York also allow telephone conversations to be admitted into evidence as long as one part has consented to such recording (Pilgrim Software, 2007).…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Due Process Model
    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Due Process Model

    No matter the model neither one would be 100% satisfying, but after learning about some of the pros and cons of both the models I believe the due process model should be adopted as the sole basis of the criminal justice system in the U.S.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Cupp Versus Murphy Brief
    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cupp Versus Murphy Brief

    Appellate Procedure: The respondent appealed his conviction, claiming that the fingernail scrapings were the product of an unconstitutional search under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, 465 P.2d 900, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari, 400 U.S. 944. Murphy then commenced the present action for federal habeas corpus relief. The District Court, in an unreported decision, denied the habeas petition, and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, 461 F.2d 1006. The Court of…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Procedural And Prostantive Due Process
    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page

    Procedural And Prostantive Due Process

    In the United States the legal system allows for every citizen to maintain certain measurable rights. While some of these rights rely on the legal system to provide a series of checks and balances to keep the citizens protected, and ensure that the rights of any given person are not violated. Due process is the system that creates the balance between the citizens, and the government’s laws in place to protect them. Even with comprehensive laws in place there are allowances needed within the educational system in order for the process to protect the students and staff. Students in public schools find due process consists of two parts, Procedural and Substantive Due process. Due process for educators and administrators consist of the same…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    evidence law
    • 2224 Words
    • 9 Pages

    evidence law

    According to the Evidence Act Cap 6, evidence denotes the means by which any alleged matter or facts the truth of which is submitted to investigations, approved or disapproved, admissions, presumption of law and observations by courts in the judicial capacity as per section 2[1]d of the act.…

    • 2224 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics