Preview

Supreme Court Case: Tate Vs. Colorado

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Case: Tate Vs. Colorado
Supreme Court Case 11SC382 Tate vs Colorado SUMMARY Officer Benda was driving through a apartment complex when he saw a man with his car on.
Officer Benda pulled up behind him, blocking the man in his parking space. The man, William Tate, was asleep/passed out at the steering wheel with the car on and in park. Officer Benda reported that the man had several open or empty beer cans around him. Officer Benda then knocked on the window and asked the man to turn off the engine and step out of the car. According to the officer, Tate had difficultly balancing and had the smell of alcohol on him. The officer arrested Tate for driving under the influence and when in the car on the way to the jail, Officer Benda told Tate that his license was revoked and should not have been driving. At the Jail, Tate had a blood sample taken to establish his blood-alcohol level.
…show more content…
At the trial, Tate moved to suppress evidence obtained during the investigation. As he did this, he noticed that when Officer Benda parked behind Tate, it was an unlawful seizure according to the fourth amendment. The court concluded that he was seized with reason to believe Tate was under the influence. This caused the conclusions to be reversed and was therefore inadmissible at trail. This case was moved to the district court and this court concluded that a person could not be seized within the meaning of the fourth amendment if he is unaware of the police presence. The court also concluded that Officer Benda had reasonable suspicion to arrest Tate, thus reversing the conclusions and was therefore inadmissible at

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dwight Dexter’s rights were not upheld in criminal justice system. Sheriff Dodd had searched Dwight’s car without a warrant or consent, violating Dwight's protection from search and seizure stated in the Fourth Amendment. In addition to this, Randolph Stone and Morgan Livingston, key witnesses, had admitted to falsely testifying against Dwight. Furthermore, all African American jurors had been thrown out, making the trial inconsistent with the Sixth Amendment.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While on duty, I observed a dark colored passenger car sitting at the back parking lot at Franklin Ball Park. Anyone at Franklin Ball Park is also trespassing after dark. I approached the vehilce and upon my approach, the driver, Wesley Herrington was throwing up on the ground. I also smelled a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage coming fro his expelled breath. The keys to the car were also in the ignition upon my approach. Herrington also admited that he was drinking alcohol. I aslo abserved a bottle of liquor sitting in the passenger seat, in Herrington reach.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case Ridley v. California the Court decided on whether the searching of a smart phone of someone placed under arrest without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment. David Ridley was arrested for possession of firearms. During the arrest an officer seized Ridley’s cell phone and searched his phone without obtaining a warrant from a judge. The officer found evidence that involves him in an earlier gang shooting and charged him in the shooting. During his trial the California Court of Appeals ruled that the search and the obtaining evidence from his cell phone was valid. He appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court decide unanimously that police need a warrant to search a suspect’s cell phone.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    cja324r3 ethical worksheet

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There was only one vehicle parked on the street and was still warm. The car belongs to the couples. The wife informed the officers that she had not driven the car all day. She told the officers that her husband drove the car four hours ago. The officers follow the husband to the door, and the keys fell out of his pocket. The officers perform an alcoholic test on the husband, and he fails it. The officers are responding to a domestic call.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that the word commerce comprehended navigation, and that it had the power to regulate navigation. Secondly, the Supreme Court held that navigation involved the control of navigable waters, and included the power to keep them open and free from obstruction, and to make improvements. Thirdly, the Supreme Court concluded that under the commerce clause Congress had the power to authorize improvements in waters within the limits of a state…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 9/16/2017 at 1330 hours, I Officer Graves, conducted a traffic stop in reference to a speeding violation. Upon further investigation it was determined the driver, Tate, had a warrant for worthless checks. Tate was served the warrant and placed under arrest roadside. Tate appeared before Magistrate Rodgers and given a written promise to appear.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Missouri police officer stopped Tyler McNeely after observing it exceeding the posted speed limit and repeatedly crossing the center line. The officer noticed McNeely’s bloodshot eyes, his slurred speech, and a smell of alcohol on his breath. McNeely performed poorly on a battery of field sobriety tests, and he declined to take a Breathalyzer test. When McNeely indicated he refuse a breath sample for testing, the officer took him to a nearby hospital for blood alcohol test. The officer explained to McNeely that under Missouri’s implied consent law, refusal to submit voluntarily to the blood test would lead to an immediate one-year suspension of his driver’s license and could be used against him in any future prosecution. The testing of the blood indicated that the blood alcohol level was significantly above the legal limit. McNeely had challenged the blood test evidence claiming that there should have been a search warrant before ordering a blood sample.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4rth Amendment

    • 6813 Words
    • 28 Pages

    The case present before us involves the constitutionality of a dog sniff in regards to the 4rth Amendment. The respondent claims that the police officer, a representative of the State of Florida lacked probable cause to search the vehicle. The dog used in the operation, Aldo was not reliable since his detector certification had expired. Also, the officer did not maintain a record of his field performance alerts. As a result, the respondent contends that Aldo’s alert was false thereby diminishing the validity of probable cause. On the other hand, the State of Florida counters by arguing that probable cause is a flexible common sense standard and requires only a fair probability and not hard certainties. Moreover, the officer who had trained with the dog is the best judge of the dog’s credibility as opposed to the Court’s especially since law enforcement agencies act with good faith. Consequently, defense counsel moved to suppress the physical evidence as the product of a warrantless search without probable cause. The trial court denied the motion to suppress but made no findings. The respondent then appealed to the Florida First District Court of Appeal. They affirmed. Harris v. State, 989 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). The Florida Supreme Court quashed the lower court decision. Harris v. State, 71 So. 3d 756 (Fla. 2011). The Court scrutinized the case under the totality of the circumstances test established in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) and concluded that Aldo’s reliability, was not enough to demonstrate probable cause.…

    • 6813 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arizona v. Gant

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While waiting police arrested two others for giving false identification and for possession of drug paraphernalia. Mr. Gant had apparently left the residence and was pulling up to the residence while the officers were arresting the other two individuals. Officers confirmed that he was in fact the driver of a vehicle making its way into the driveway. After exiting the vehicle, officers called to Gant and he was arrested for driving on a suspended license.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethical Worksheet

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages

    |dropped the keys when observed walking up the sidewalk, and that he had an alcohol level of 2.0. Officer Nixon is a 20-year |…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very controversial court case in American history was Texas vs. Johnson (1984). In 1984, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson followed a group of anti – Reagan protesters to oppose the American exploitation of third world countries. This act of rebellion resulted in the burning of the American flag. Out of a total of approximately one hundred demonstrators who were involved in this ordeal, Johnson was solely charged with a crime. Johnson was arrested under Texas law, which made the burning of the United States or Texas flags crimes. Johnson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail and fined two thousand dollars for his crime in restitution. Texas reasoned that the police were preventing the breach of peace; consider the flag a symbol of national unity. At Johnson's court trial, he was convicted of aiding, abetting and encouraging the burning of the Texan flag. This, in turn, made Johnson guilty under Texas state law.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Memorandum of Law

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Cruz Estrada (hereon known as Estrada) was riding with her friend, Luis Briones (hereon known as Briones), when Briones' car was pulled over by Officer Green. They were traveling south on I-95 toward Miami to visit friends. Officer Green said he had stopped the car because they were speeding.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays