Preview

Structrual Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Structrual Analysis
Structural Analysis In their essays, both authors Sidney Callahan and Deborah Tannen discuss strategies for a possible improvement in society’s ways of arguing. In “Fight Fierce but Fair: Practice at Home,” (1994), Callahan claims “if you learn to fight well and fairly at home, you can contribute to the civic struggle necessary to keep a pluralistic society moving.” With a set of guidelines and rules composed through personal experience, Callahan successfully uses this technique to give readers an immediate call to action and a solid, convincing essay. In “The Triumph of the Yell,” (1994), Tannen claims that “more and more these days, journalists, politicians, and academics treat public discourse as an argument – not in the sense of making an argument, but in the sense of having one, of having a fight.” Tannen masterfully uses the anecdotes and introduces new ideas to readers to create a compelling argument. Callahan begins her essay discussing her personal experiences in public debating with her family. Using this technique such as anecdotes instantly establishes her essay as informal and grabs the reader’s attention. Continuing on, Callahan again tries to keep readers’ interest in the topic by providing another anecdote discussing her relationship with her husband, “One of the most critical agreements that Dan and I share is our joint commitment to the Callahan guidelines for conducting civilized debate. If we could convince the larger world of these rules (painfully acquired from experience in public debates on abortion), we could make a great contribution to cleaning up our polluted public discourse.” This is a very useful technique Callahan uses in order to prove her methods for conducting civilized debate are successful since her relationship is fine with her husband, despite their disagreements. Following her anecdotes are the guidelines she provides for debate. She provides theses guidelines in a terse manner. Though she explains each rule in detail,


Cited: Callahan, Sidney. “Fight Fierce but Fair: Practice at Home.” Commonweal 11 Feb. 1994 Tannen, Deborah. “The Triumph of the Yell.” New York Times 14 Jan. 1994

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Logic in “A Plea for Civil Discourse” In Dr. Leskes’ article “A Plea for Civil Discourse”, she makes the case for the importance of civil discourse in our democracy and the Academy’s place in restoring it. According to Dr. Leskes, the men and women of the Academy hold the future of civil discourse and, in turn, our own democracy. Her argument is not just made well it is made logically and realistically, using facts and evidence to persuade others to consider her point of view. Civil discourse is important to maintaining our democracy.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “Both Sides Come Out Fighting: The Argument Culture and the Press”, Deborah Tannen explains that the Press over-simplifies and dramatizes situations, and validates ridiculous arguments in order to appeal to viewers. She provides many examples of the harm this practice can cause, and describes the “Argument Culture” which is present in society. The Press has sizable influence because the way that events are reported affects people’s perceptions, in turn this affects the events themselves. The Media relies on controversy and drama to make news more interesting. They may exaggerate what was said, or analyse non-existent tensions. In the pursuit of remaining unbiased both sides of a story will be equally represented. The societal belief that…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Lazere, Donald. "Chapter 13 Thinking Critically About Political Rhetoric." Reading and Writing for Civic Literacy: The Critical Citizen 's Guide to Argumentative Rhetoric. Boulder: Paradigm, 2009. 267-301. Print.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Tannen is a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University. Her study of language and how it is utilized has led her to have many books on the “Best-Selling” List. In her book, “The Argument Culture”, Deborah Tannen takes a closer look at how we as a society have come to view arguing/debating as a normal form of communication. Our inability to look at more than two views at a time, has led us to limit the potential conversations that could easily take place. In this essay, Professor Tannen takes a shot at making us believe that being in an “Argument-culture” is not the best thing for us as a whole. She wants us to see that it is truly a problem but that it can be fixed by following her advice. Tannen feels that everything…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Argument Culture” is a persuasive essay written by Professor Deborah Tannen. As a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University, Tannen experience in language leads her to write many books in this field. Tannen uses “The Argument Culture” essay to persuade her audience that this society’s way of looking at debate encourages an “adversarial frame of mind” (Tannen, 305). Three of Tannen’s main points include; polarized views in the news, the use of “war metaphors’ by media to catch the readers eye, and even in the language mankind uses in everyday life. Tannen’s essay also includes different ways to look at these each of these situations that may help reduce the debate language that this society uses every day.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis of Rush Limbaugh

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since the time of the woman 's suffrage movement, many articles and essays have reached newspapers and magazines across the country. Several of these essays were written to inform people, but others were created to strictly entertain the audience. Rush Limbaugh 's essay, "The Latest from the Feminist Front," is an essay created to entertain and voice only his opinion. The elements of writing used to create a credible and valid argument can be taken out of context. Rush Limbaugh uses style, form, and claims to make his argument but is not effective in making his argument valid.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book “ 50 Essays” by Samuel Cohen : “ Civil Disobedience” by Charles Thoreau, “Letter from Birmingham” by Martin Luther King Jr., and “ Civil Disobedience: Destroyer of Democracy” by Lewis H. Van Dusen Jr. , and with each of these essays they use different ways throughout their essays to persuade the readers. I will be discussing the different appeals that each Author uses to draw in their audience by using ethos,logos,pathos,and Kairos. Each appeal has a different meanings, and as well a different way of connecting with its audience. Thoreau and Van Dusen uses similar forms of persuasion to obtain their audience's attention throughout the essays.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though not directly regarded as a prime example of an argumentative tool, acknowledging the opposing viewpoint in a controversial topic adds persuasion. Kristof gives studies for why Obama was at a disadvantage because of his race during the 2007 election season, but also states that it could be the other way around. “It appeals to some whites as a demonstration of their open-mindedness, and it wins him overwhelming black votes and turnout.” Yet again, more ethos is added to the author. A sign of intelligence and open-mindedness is seeing other views beside one’s one, and that is exactly what Kristof…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this book is Howard Fineman, one of the most trusted political journalists that discusses the American debate of the 13 arguments. One question Howard proposes to the reader would be, who is a person? Still till this day, us Americans are still trying to determine the answer to that. Every generation is evolving into something greater than it was before. According to the Declaration of Independence, it believes that a person is ‘everyone’, but that it took some time to figure this all out through many Civil Right Acts and other movements. The purpose for Howard to write this story was to ‘cut through’ the chaos during each day. The themes within this book go along with the everyday debates; whether through the various types of newspaper arguments such as the Daily Kos of even the Drudge Report. The position that Howard is trying to portray to his audience is that as a journalist, he is displaying the inside scoop of the behind the scenes government. Informing all the people that debate and argument is actually okay. If no one was able to debate or argue, then the world would be boring. It keeps the people on their toes and interested with what is about to be said next. From earlier, debating gives freedom of speech for all, and will continue to give freedom of speech for the years to come. With this, I agree…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This essay argues that the Globe and Mail (G&M) article, ‘Don’t Teach Until You See the Whites of Their Eyes’ (18 August 2012), is persuasive with its primary target audience of G&M readers. Clifford Orwin, the author of this article, is a professor of political science at the University of Toronto. Furthermore, the main focus of this article deals with the fact that: “Real education requires real teachers and students, not disembodied electronic wraiths.” Through the rhetorical analysis of this editorial, this paper will demonstrate that its persuasiveness can be attributed to four key aspects: through an emphasis on the use of deliberative stasis; its use of ethos and logos; and through its effective use of rhetorical imagery. Before the case can be made for understanding how and why this article is persuasive, we need to begin with setting the context of the issue or exigence to which the article was responding and whether that response was timely and appropriate.…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Foster Segal, Carolyn. “Copy This.” Practical Argument: A Text and Anthology. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. 307-10. Print.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To truly win in on the side one stands on, the idea must be put into an argumentative state, and blown away. When discussed and realizing the true nature behind an idea, it begins to lose its…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ivie, Robert L. Democratic Dissent and the Trick of Rhetorical Critique. 3rd ed. Vol. 5. Bloomington, IN: Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions, 2005.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective Arguments

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many important events in our nation's history were influenced by persuasive arguments. Many sides have gained support due to the writings or speeches gave by an effective speaker. These arguments take a lot to be effective. There are three key components, and if an argument lacks any one of them, it is not effective. Organization, diction, and bias words are all important aspects to any effective argument. Using these three elements, Thomas Paine was able to make a triumphant case, whereas James Chalmers' writing did not and was therefore ineffective.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Debaters

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The movie the Great Debaters can teach us many things about the value of rhetoric. The dictionary definition of rhetoric is, the study of writing or speaking as a means of communication or persuasion. So a movie that deals with a group of young black college students fighting for rights can teach us a great deal of things. First off these students, instead of fighting with riots and their fists used words. They began against the top Negro college in the state of Texas and eventually worked their way up to the Harvard University. Harvard had won league championships multiple times and these students from a small Wiley college, while undefeated were still unproven. Wiley saw and faced many challenges on their way to their debate at Harvard. In order to evoke emotion from the judges and audience the students used a personal anecdote, a certain instance when they witnessed a lynch mob on their way to a debate. It cannot be argued that just that anecdote won them the debate but it played a huge part in persuading the audience their way. Other uses of rhetoric in the movie include using humor against their opponent’s to evoke a reaction from the audience. Also putting spins on definitions of words such as the word law in which the Wiley debaters had a different view of the word law based on their experience whilst the Harvard debaters had their own view but each argued their view with different example such as Wiley using Gandhi and his civil disobedience or the Harvard debaters using a personal anecdote. Ultimately many exampled of rhetoric are tied into the movie the Great Debaters throughout each debate but at the Harvard debate these uses became prevalent.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays