Conflict Rhetorical Analysis

My mother has told me since I was a child, “Conversation before confrontation. You must use your words to solve differences before violence.” That saying has always stuck with me since the first time I heard it. In keeping it close to my heart, I have grown to live by those words. Before any source of conflict can arise, I take the pacifist route to try and solve differences instead of letting hate overcome a more peaceful direction.
People in the world will always disagree. That is the one fact of life that can remain constant no matter how much time comes to pass or how far one can travel around the globe. When prompted with Phillip Hammond’s quote, I can completely agree with him. While differences will always remain between populations, using violence to get their point across will never be
To truly win in on the side one stands on, the idea must be put into an argumentative state, and blown away. When discussed and realizing the true nature behind an idea, it begins to lose its
Before taking my orientation class, I had no stand on what side I should stand with or what course of action should be taken. Facts and opinions were so muddled together in the news and online, it was hard to try and find truth among any sources. After sitting through a semester of class, learning both sides of the conflict, I could finally understand when I heard about a recent bombing from Israel or a retaliation by the Palestine people. But when it comes to the large debate, I can’t find myself to pick a side to stick with. There are so many factors that go into this large debate, there isn’t just one side I can always defend. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be summed down into four major reasons for fighting: borders and security, Israel settlements in Palestinian designated land, Palestinian refugees fleeing into Israeli territory, and who claims