Preview

Strepsiades Unjust Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
446 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strepsiades Unjust Speech
Initially, in the play, Strepsiades is a man who lacks moral understandings of what is right or wrong. With the help of Socrates and the Thinkery, Strepsiades is able to get rid of the moderation and asceticism in his lifestyle, and is able to prosper from learning the just and unjust speech. Although, since Socrates only uses the practical wisdom of philosophy, he hinders Strepsiades’s knowledge of knowing the right and wrong. By just applying practical wisdom it adds justice to the unjust speech and does not create a balance for both speeches. Furthermore, the weaker speech is considered the unjust speech in the play because it opposes all the theories that the just speech has to say. Moreover, in addition to comparing the unjust and just speeches, the unjust says, “I’ll overturn them by speaking against them, / for I quite deny that Justice even exists” (Line 900-901). In contrast, the weaker speech will always argue against the stronger speech because of the opposing notions on each side. However, a better example of both speeches can be depicted by mentioning the new and the old …show more content…
If someone with a practical mind like Socrates, were to handle a situation, that person would justify what is right or wrong based on the set rules of authority and show no passion for whichever situation. In contrast, the practical wisdom would also go against authority if authority in this case were wrong by any means. However, someone with skeptical wisdom like Strepsiades, would only look through situations through passion and faith alone. Strepsiades showed no signs of being obedient throughout the play always skeptical about the Greek gods and relied on authority to handle measures. By obtaining the ability of both speeches you learn that with balance you can handle most situations and are able to see justice and injustice

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He believes that any knowledgeable person in a craft will not try to surpass his fellow craftsman. He asks, “Do you think that a musician… wants to outdo another musician…?” (349e) This is weak because it contradicts Socrates’s own argument by discussing the unjust man and his actions, which implies that there is indeed a possibility of unjust acts to get ahead in society. Thrasymachus explains that when people act justly it is a disadvantage to them because the unjust are at an advantage, even though his argument is complex it is more sensible than Socrates…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gorgias had been arguing that rhetoric was almost synonymous with power, as a rhetor can convince anyone to do anything. This, to Gorgias and Polus, is true power and will lead to one’s happiness. However, from the measly two pages or so of argument, Socrates is able to prove sound doubt as to whether this is true or not. This is all to back up Socrates’ earlier claim that “both rhetors and tyrants have the smallest power in the cities” (466d4-5). By using the argument of justice, Socrates is able to prove that doing what is unjust is not good for anyone, especially the person committing the injustices.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Republic begins with a debate on the subject of morality. One by one, Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymachus put forth their definitions of morality and one by one, they come up short. None survive the merciless scrutiny of the author’s mentor, Socrates.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The selected text that will be examined in this essay is Oedipus the King and Plato ‘Crito’. Oedipus and Socrates play a major role in their own lives when it comes to their intelligence in resolving issues that are given to them. In contrast, there is a difference between our world and the Greek culture, which seems to be very alienating. The following discussion examines that Oedipus and Socrates stage mythical knowledge and autonomy in their presentation of themselves to the audience. It shows what implications self-reliance has for the authority of Oedipus’ and Socrates’ traditional beliefs.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Arguments

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He tries to hear him out about why he thinks that way but for some reason he just could not understand him. Throughout the book Socrates and Thrasymachus goes through trying to answer the questions that comes up. Earlier in this essay I mentioned the second question that came up about an unjust man. Socrates wanted Thrasymachus to explain exactly why he felt the way he felt about defining justice so he could eventually make his claim against him. Although it was tough for me to take a stand because the arguments on neither side were a strong as they could have been. I think it is safer for me to say Socrates has won the argument because it is tough to agree with Thrasymachus. I do agree with the claims Socrates made about justice being a virtue of the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. "Fair is foul, and foul is fair," is stated in line 10 by the witches in the opening of the play. The significance of this paradox is that it sets us up for the doubleness of the play. It means what is fair to the witches is foul to man.…

    • 3134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inside the pages of the Greek poet Aristophanes’ Clouds, the reader will find a drastically different portrayal of the philosopher Socrates than one would inside the pages of the Republic. In the play, Socrates is completely unaware of his surroundings, and is able to justify purposely making just actions stronger than just actions. The main character, Strepsiades, initially seeks the help of Socrates because he knows Socrates will provide him with the skills to avoid paying back his debts to the city. Even though Plato’s Socrates in The Republic would probably not agree, the philosophic life described in books V-VI of The Republic resembles the philosophic life demonstrated by Aristophanes’ Socrates in the Clouds.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology Analysis

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Meletus accuses the philosopher of corrupting the youth as oppose to bettering them. Socrates is also arraigned with being a sophist, making the bad look good, not believing in god - or at least not recognizing the gods worshiped by society and finally, being an outright ‘evil-doer’. During his speech, Socrates first addresses Aristophanes (A playwright of Athens), and his pursuit to make Socrates out to be a bit of a trash-talker who claims he can walk through air along with other absurdities. Socrates claims that although he is a teacher of philosophy, he does not charge. Even though frowned upon Socrates admires anyone that possess such great knowledge and is able to charge for their teachings. In a modest manner he states, “Had I the same, I should have been very proud and conceited; but the truth is that I have no knowledge of that kind.” This is important because it aids in the proving of Socrates innocence, being that if he was indeed such a pompous, conceited philosopher he would not be able to admit his lack of knowledge. Throughout the excerpt Socrates makes reference to many stories in effort of proving to the jury before him how he acquired such an atrocious reputation. Socrates mentions that he believes the only reason he was put on trial was because Meletus does not like him for possessing such unique…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In society, being self-centered about ideas frequently affects peoples’ judgement. Sophocles raises this issue in his play Antigone. He believes that listening to the wise benefits your judgement, but the result of refusing to listen leads to tragic outcomes. Sophocles uses Ate to develop the characters’ inability to take in others’ perspective.…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In part of Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates begins a debate with a student of the orator, Gorgias, named Polus. Polus and Socrates argue about if someone who commits unjust acts and is not caught is more miserable than someone who was caught for their unjust acts. Socrates argues for the position that the person is less miserable if they are punished. Polus finds this absurd and Socrates shows his reasoning. In this paper I will go through and evaluate the main points of their argument and discuss whether or not I support them. I will be explaining how Socrates position flows logically from the points he makes and show how Polus’ position goes from very strong to weak.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power In 12 Angry Men

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In some parts of the play, the Jurors are not thoughtful of the way they phrase their statements which as an effect, obtains a different response from the other jurors than originally meant.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, I explicate connections between Socrates’ descriptions of himself and his role as a citizen and educator in his home city, Athens, as portrayed in Plato’s Apology. The Apology depicts the trial of Socrates, and its entirety is narrated from the point of view of Socrates. Therefore, in the account of this trial, we have a lens through which we can view Socrates’ ideologies and convictions. Additionally, because Socrates is speaking directly to a jury of five hundred and one Athenians, from this dialogue we can interpret how Socrates saw his life and purpose in relation to Athens and her people through his direct interaction with them.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays