Preview

Plato Justice And Injustice Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
962 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato Justice And Injustice Analysis
Mahfuzul Islam Period 4
Western Political Theory Mr. Polazzo
Injustice in our Society and in Ourselves What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t
…show more content…
In my opinion, it should be abolished because doing an unjust thing to an unjust man does not make that thing justified. Murder is an unjust act because, based off of Glaucon’s definition of injustice, a healthy and sane person would never intentionally want someone else to kill them on purpose which means that society considers murder unjust. That is why, it should not go around killing people on purpose because by doing so it joins the ranks of criminals. In a way it is also kind of ironic because humanity calls murderers the “scum of society”, yet it thinks that by executing them it is a “hero”. However, people are judged by their actions, and killing another human being is about as profound as actions come. The death penalty is a lot like injustice because people want to commit injustices, but they don’t want unjust things done to them, which is like people wanting other people to be executed, but if they were the ones that were being killed then they wouldn’t want it. Whichever way you look at it, killing another human isn't humane, not even close, and when you get into the details it is simply vengeful and …show more content…
The tyrant, who is also the most unjust man, is the least happy, but the aristocrat, the most just man, is the most happy, which shows that it pays to be just. In turn, Socrates comes up with his own definition of justice where, just like the ideal society, the just man has to balance the rational part of his soul, the spirited part of his soul, and the appetitive part of his soul. The problem, though, is that with this definition, the hoi polloi of America is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paragraph Glaucon, who has taken up the argument from Thrasymachus, makes his definition of justice. He states that justice is a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear. People understand that being unjust is often to their advantage; however, they also fear being the victim of injustice. If they could act unjustly without suffering the consequences they would. This partially explains Thrasymachus? earlier definition of justice as the advantage of the strong. No reason exists for a person who can act unjustly to their own benefit without being the subject of injustice themselves not to. Justice is therefore a reciprocal agreement between peoples too weak to be immune from injustice not to be unjust and is a contract not willingly entered. Glaucon presents this definition as a culmination of previous argument and as an explanation he feels will be suitable to Socrates.…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 15, Hobbes responds to the Fool’s criticism on justice. In the Republic, Plato refutes Glaucon’s argument against a just life. Both of their respective challengers claim that people naturally prefer the unjust life in comparison to a just life. I will analyze how Hobbes and Plato responds to their corresponding critics. Through the investigation of how Hobbes and Plato interpret justice and their different viewpoints, I believe that Plato presented a stronger argument as to why individuals should live a just life.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon's Argument

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Book 2 of the Republic, Glaucon is passionate about finding the true meaning of what justice is. To do this he decides to praise injustice in the purest way so that Socrates will refute it and give him the meaning of justice in its purest form. Glaucon approaches the situation by discussing the following three points: the “kind of thing people consider justice to be and what its origins are”, “that all who practice it do so unwillingly, as something necessary, not as something good”, and that “they have good reason to act as they do, for the life of an unjust person is, they say, much better than that of a just one”. Glaucon provides excellent evidence and reasoning for his argument and by looking at it from the view of the natural man, one who doesn’t have a spirit or conscience to refute injustice, his argument holds truth.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most complex foundations of our society is justice, which has always been overlooked without much thought. According to Thrasymachus, in Plato’s The Republic, who breaks irately into the discussion, proclaims that he has a superior meaning of justice to offer. Justice, he says, is simply the point of interest of the stronger. In spite of the fact that Thrasymachus claims that this is his definition, it is not so much implied as a meaning of justice as much as it is a delegitimization of justice. He is stating that it doesn't pay to be just.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    abolished or not. Many people think that the death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights, they also believe that it violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is also known to be a cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment to kill someone even though they have murdered or had help the killer commit the crime. Some people believe what is the point of the death penalty, they are already dead so how is it helping any for the victim.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The fundamental aim of the Republic is to define justice. In the pursuit to defining justice Socrates engages in a range of discussions in these discussions many important ideas and arguments are presented. This essay will discuss five of the most important ideas and arguments displayed in the Republic as well as stating the reasons for their importance in Plato’s justice argument. The essay concludes with reasons why these ideas are relevant in today’s society.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice? Why do men behave justly? Is it because they fear the consequences of injustice? Is it worthwhile to be just? Is justice a good thing in and of itself regardless of its rewards or punishments? Speaking through his teacher Socrates, Plato attempts to answer these questions in the Republic. In book I Thrasymachus, a rival of Socrates makes the claim that justice is nothing but the advantage of the stronger. It does not pay to be just because those who behave unjustly naturally gain power and become the rulers of society. Justice is what unjust rulers say is right through the rules that they make. It is injustice that is the source of happiness#. Plato sets out to disprove Thrasymachus' argument and provide an accurate definition of justice through which he will demonstrate that justice is good and desirable and it is in our best interests to adhere to it. Plato claims that there are two kinds of justice, individual and political. Since the city is larger than the…

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We walk the fine line of the Just and Unjust during Plato's book 2 of The Republic as we listen in to Glaucon insist on achieving concrete answers with Socrates. As Glaucon plays devil's advocate he states that the nature of man is selfish and cruel as it delves into the unjust with the famous tale of the Gyge of Lydian. With such a powerful example, Socrates acknowledges that the urges of the unjust do weigh heavily on individuals, but that the reward of doing a unjust act does not compare to the harm of suffering such an act from others, and that laws in place must hold that line between the two extremes. But how would this system work? Socrates first states that one must recognize certain levels of man depending on their intelligence and…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Moral Theory

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When Plato’s Republic was introduced in my coursework, I approached this book just like other books that I have read. But the Republic is not written like a typical textbook, but rather, like a living conversation. And like most conversations, it develops important ideas to improve our lives. As you read this book, you notice a main idea that Plato is trying to convey: why a person should bother to be good. But in order to be good, the Republic opens with asking the reader what is justice. Plato provides us with many answers, but he doesn’t frame those answers in terms that we would expect. Instead, Plato frames the answer in terms of how an individual should structure the different parts of his mind in order to become a just person and then enact that justice in the outside world. This paper delves into several ideas that provide a simplified outline of how to become a moral person.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Justice is served” is the cliché line heard in courtrooms throughout the world of fantasy. What justice is proves to be more difficult to define. Many definitions state it as an action that is the result or punishment for a negative action. The trouble lies in what defines what is just, the law, society or morality. Plato’s use of Socrates in “Crito” argues that justice is defined as the laws of a city or state as well as what a person’s own perception of justice is. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Molière’s play Tartuffe argues that justice is both a moral concept as well as a way of reprimanding wrongdoing by a higher political power. Antigone is Sophocles’ description of justice which lies in the social repercussions for those who break the laws…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    death penalty

    • 1920 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty cannot administer properly and fair, so it should be abolished. Murdering is not the answer. However, the thought of morality or the overlook of ethics can make judgments of people either right or wrong, but the death penalty takes away the lives of people who deserve help. Then, the cost of the death penalty is simply too expensive, but it is worth the money to stop criminals from committing a crime again. However, the death penalty takes away money from hardworking people, and it is going towards inmates on death row. Also, the death penalty has been used as deterrent but statistics show that may not be the case. The justice system acts to put away inmates on death row, but the justice system can also create false evidence creating a flawed justice system. Moreover, there are other punishments as institutionalization and incarceration that may or may not help out others on death row. Therefore, moving on with the death penalty; it is not the proper way to murder someone.…

    • 1920 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato offers two main analogies to examine the definition of justice. The division of parts in the soul as well as the parts of the state. Both of the parts have some similar things. Plato claims that the justice is the same in the soul and in the state. In the analogy of the state Plato supports the definition of justice as “doing one’s own work”. It becomes obvious that in order for justice to remain in the state each person has to do his own work and not meddle with others.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished. I absolutely agree with this statement. From a personal standpoint, I do not believe in the death penalty for several reasons. One is the fear of someone being put to death that is innocent. It is also, in my opinion, just as much punishment to sentence someone to life in prison without the chance for parole. From a business standpoint I do not believe the death penalty is cost effective. I know that it is expensive to run prisons; however it is also very costly to those states that do use the death penalty. In some states juries make the decision on which convicted criminals are put to death and in some states judges make these decisions. I am also again the death penalty because I do not feel that any person should have the part they played in putting someone to death on their conscious forever.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays