Preview

State Intestacy Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3050 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State Intestacy Case Study
1. Twenty-two yurs ago, James and Kevin began dating, and 19 years ago, they began living together. Last year, James i.o.herited over $9,000,000 from his grandfather. He wants to enSIlIe that if he dies first,
Kevin will be taken c:are offor the rest of his life. Despite your insistence, James does not have a will, and you have advised h1m previously that state intestacy la_ do not protect same-sex partners. Which of the following _et ownership options would fulfill James' goal of tl'ansferring assets to Kevin at his deathl a. Community property.
b. Tenancy in common with each other.
c. Joint tenancy with rights of survivorship.
d. Tenancy by the entirety.
The correct answer is c.
When one owner dies owning property held as
…show more content…
Each partner is listed as the beneficiary of the other partner's qualified pension plan.
c. Each partner i. a joint tenant in all of the couple's property owned joint tenancy with rights of survi""rshlp.
d. State intestacy laws.
The correct answer is d.
State intestacy laws usually do not provide for asset transfers ro non-relared parries, including rhe surviving partner in a same-sex couple. The designated beneficiary of a lite insurance policy will receive the proceeds of the life insurance policy by state contract law. The designated beneficiary of a qualified pension plan will also receive the assets by state contract law. A joint tenant of properry hdd ]TWROS will also receive the decedent joint tenant's interest per the srate contract law,
8, Kim and Tommy ha"" lived In Atirona since their marriage. Kim recei""d an inheritance from her father during their marriage. Kim and Tommy are moving to Massachusetts for a new job and have some questions regarding their mo"" tn a common law (separate property) state from a community­ property state. Which of the following statements is correct?

a. When a couple moves from a community-property state to a common law
…show more content…
Community property a""ids probate at the death of the first spowe and automatically passes to the surviving spowe by operation of law.
d. To get the step-to fair market value in basis at the death of the first spowe, a couple who lives in a common law (separate property) state can elect to treat their separate property as community property.
The correct answer is a.
Answer a is the only Correct statement, When a couple moves from a community property srare to a common law (separare properry) stare. separate property will generally remain separate property. Answer b is incorrect because separate properry does nor generally become communiry properry when a married couple moves from a common law srare ro a community property State. Answer c is incorrecr because community properry may be disposed of by will and does not auromatically pass to the surviving spouse by operarion of law. Finally. answer dis incorrecr because couples living in common law states cannot elect community property treatment at the dearh of the first spouse in order to get a srep-up in basis,

MULTIPLE-C~OICE PROBLEMS

27

9. Dan hu owned 100% of the stock of Dam'1 Baked Goods, a corporation, for 22 Y""fS. In the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    9) Mike transfers securities to an irrevocable trust and gives Rachel the power to determine who will receive the trust's income and assets. Rachel, her estate, and her creditors cannot be beneficiaries or receive the trust assets. Rachel has a general power of appointment.…

    • 9691 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lit - Task310.2.1-05

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Liability: Each partner can be held jointly and personally liable for all debts and taxes.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lit 1 Task 1

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Liability- Partners share all profits but are completely liable for all debts associated with the partnership, just as one would with a sole proprietorship…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hodel Vs Irving Summary

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages

    5. Halbach - Inheritance is the least objectionable means to deal with property at death. Tax levels are going up to over 3 million by 2010, infinite by 2011…back to 1 million by 2012 (because congress didn’t have the votes for permanence)…

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hands on Exercise 5

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Partner’s Share of Income, Deductions, ▶ See back of form and separate instructions. Credits, etc.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is presumed that a co-tenancy is a tenancy in common unless there is specific language indicating the intent to establish a joint tenancy.…

    • 2518 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    | * No formulation * Written contracts are advisable to ensure all partners know exactly what their responsibilities are * Scotland – separate limited personality – making it an artificial person (a body that the law recognises as a person in its own right; it can take legal actions and defend them) * Shared responsibilities * Privacy * Incentive to do well * Shared profits…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Worldwide Wires

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    • The partner is responsible to pay amounts due for services provided by other partners…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    had to transfer their assets abroad in trusts in the United Kingdom and the United States and they…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    types of ownership

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

     Share  Tweet  Share  PinThere are five types of property ownership. The use of these types can depend on the state and the law where the property is located. Each type of ownership also dictates the amount of ownership and how ownership is transferred after death. It does not matter where the owner resides. Have a question? Get an answer from a lawyer now!…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fffffffffffff

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. The different types of owning property are separate property (aloud to give away at death), joint tenancy (couple ownership), community property (married couples, 50% ownership), community property with right survivorship (if a spouse were to pass away, the other person would be entitled to the whole property), tenancy by the entirety (same as above but they don’t have to go through a probate), tenancy in common (division of ownership).…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was entrusted withday to day activities, and it is not true that he failed to take a place where he had been gifted as pe the wishes although he was given a title deed it was meant to revert to his two brothers and be gifted with the entire parcel LR. Kirimukuyu/Mbogoini/837. Clearly the deceased saw that the daughters were not ready to heed his calls and the reason he made such drastic decisions. However, said process of transfer of this property and two other brothers did not commence immediately and upon the demise of the father the said propery had not bee transferred and death had overtaken this events and the wishes of the deceased wished that Duncan Wanderi Njeri to become the owner, custodian of the said parce and that if the sister were to came back he would allocate them a…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Succession Cases

    • 24671 Words
    • 99 Pages

    Who should inherit the intestate estate of a deceased person when he or she is survived only by collateral relatives, to wit an aunt and the children of a brother who predeceased him? Or will the aunt concur with the children of the decedent’s brother or will the former be excluded by the latter.…

    • 24671 Words
    • 99 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mitakshara did not permit individual alienations by the coparceners. The Smritikars also did not seem to confer on a coparcener power of alienation over his undivided interest in the joint family property. However, the textual authority is very scanty. The law of coparcener’s power of alienation is product of judicial legislation. The first inroad was made when it was held that a personal money decree against a coparcener could be executed against his undivided interest in joint property. Some High Court extended this principle to voluntary alienations also. We may divide the subject under two heads:…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics