Preview

State Government Vs Federal Government

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State Government Vs Federal Government
The role of Federal Government and State Governments have been very important for a longtime in the United States. The relationship between Federal Government and State Governments are defined in the United States Constitution, which is a great guideline of development for us to run the entire country. In the Constitution, both governments have the same or their own powers. “The Federal and State governments share many similarities power such as setting up courts, building highways, spending money for the betterment of the general welfare, making and enforcing laws, chartering banks and corporations, creating and collecting taxes, and taking private property with just compensation” (Longley). Our current government is based on a system that …show more content…
“Results suggest INS intercepts 9.3% to 16.0% of travelers attempting illegal entry at a POE, and that INS mistakenly admits 2.95 to 5.45 million illegal immigrants at POEs annually” (Morrel-Samuels). These people escape from the political oppression or their religions while the others come here to seek a better life for them and family. Although they come to United States by this way or that way, they are causing nationwide problems. The illegal immigrants who are not English speaking workers and the illegal immigrants will take jobs away from American people because they will work for cheaper wages. Honestly, they bring good benefits to the U.S economy in the process of work. Moreover, “Economic theory predicts that immigration will redistribute income by lowering the wages of competing American workers and increasing the wages of complementary American workers as well as profits for business owners and other “users” of immigrant labor” (Borjas). This is the reason why many businesses hire them to work. However, the primary problem of immigration is security. These illegal immigrants may be terrorists and wanted criminals. They come to the United States to attack, escape the arrest, or …show more content…
I think that the State Governments should be the one, who will win in this case. The State Governments can blame this immigration problems to the Federal Government, who is responsible for it. “To put it simply, if the federal government adequately enforced the nation’s immigration laws and protected the border, there would not be more than 11 million illegal immigrants already in the country” (Editorial: Texas must battle immigration problems). If the Federal Government do not want to solve this problem, State Governments should fix the issues of illegal immigration by themselves. They can listen to the people who always want the best for their states. “According to one recent poll, 53 percent of Texas registered voters want the Legislature to pass an Arizona-style law that would allow police officers to ask people they have stopped to prove that they are here legally” (Salamon). The Federal Government did not finish their jobs well in current years, so the states fix this issue by themselves is not a big

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With Federalism does anyone really know who is in charge? Sure it allows the state to have its own government and rules but the Federal Government can deny the states decisions. Doesn’t the Federal Government really have the final say, and if they want to allow something to some extent they can put stipulations on it. Federalism is here to stay.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In politics everyone has a different opinion and it seems as if they never come to a compromise. This issue has been going on for many years now. As early as when this nation was first being built. Throughout history there have been times when the government has been at conflict. Many of these conflicts include the question as to who has more power and who should. If the states should or the national government. Two important cases in the past that have helped answer these questions are McCulloch vs. Maryland and Gibbons vs. Ogden. Both cases present conflicts that brought among state courts, which later end up being appealed in the Supreme Court and rule differently twice. Both cases ruling clear show a clear example as how the national government has a supremacy over the state government.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    States and the federal government are run by the idea of Dual Federalism. Dual Federalism is defined Lenz (n.d.) “by the idea that the national and state governments had power over different areas of public policy, and that each level of government was supreme in its field.” States can also flex their use…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are ongoing tensions between state governments and the federal government when it comes to power and its control over citizens. An environmental policy example is that some states find it more difficult to abide by federal guidelines for deforestation because they have big populations that are growing even larger. A gun control example is that since there is no "national police" to control the distribution of firearms (both legal and illegal) it will have to be handled by the state police which costs…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism is defined as “the federal principle or system of government”. This concept of “federalism” is explored in Lowi et al and Zimmerman. These two sources list and define two types of federalism. The first type they list is dual federalism, the second one is cooperative federalism. One of the most distinctive differences between the two is how the powers of the national and state governments are defined, this ties into the classic struggle of Founding Fathers: How should power be separated between the states and the national government? Both of these systems are used in our Constitution, however, I believe our current situation in the United States best fits under the system of cooperative federalism. These concepts I will explore in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the founding fathers drafted the Constitution, they were trying to make an “equal” government where the federal government doesn’t have all control. In order to do that, they delegated certain responsibilities to the states and to the federal government. On the issues that were not covered in the Constitution, the states would take control and make their own laws. What the founding fathers didn’t consider though is how people would interpret the Constitution years after it was drafted. The federal government’s power has increased in relation to that of the states because of such interpretations.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strong federal government vs Strong state government “Most bad governments have grown out of too much government,” Thomas Jefferson once said. The question is, how do we know when our government is too strong? That’s a question that takes a lot of thinking about. Or, is our state government too strong? Sadly, most people have no idea what their state government is doing, trying to do, or putting to the side.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Federalism

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There have been many of the events that led to the change in the relationship between state and federal government. The relationship and authority of states and the federal government are governed by the U.S. Constitution. At first, states had the majority power, but over time federal government gained more control. Their relationship has changed over time because the federal government delegated certain enumerated powers while the state government reserved all the other powers by the Constitution. The constitution prohibited the national government from undertaking certain actions, such as imposing taxes on exports and from passing laws restraining certain things, like freedom of speech or religion. Most of these prohibited powers are listed in Article I, section 9, and in the first eight amendments of the constitution. The federal government power has increased where the relationship among the branches has changed as well. The division of power between the states and the federal government has shifted. Some of these changes have occurred in accordance with the amendment process described in Article V of the constitution. The Tenth Amendment gives to the states reserved powers, which means that any power not given to the federal government or denied to the states is reserved to the states. Some of these numerous powers given by the Tenth Amendment to the states, including the power to regulate commerce within their borders and the power to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. Government

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our government is passed on federalism. Which means a government that shared its power between national, state and local governments. Our founding fathers wanted nothing to do with a centralized government and created the exact opposite, the federal government.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers: States vs. National Government “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (U.S. Const. amend. 10). Ratified in December of 1791, the Tenth Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that the national government does not have the authority to control the state government’s concerns that don’t intervene with the U.S Constitution and vice versa.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The separation of powers and federalism are the two major foundational elements within the US Constitution. Behind the rationales of the separation of powers and federalism in the United States is ultimately to ensure liberty, stability and harmony amongst the people within the United States, by preventing the consolidation and concentration of power within government, contributing to what we see as American exceptionalism today. In this paper, I will discuss how the differing historical contexts in which the separation of powers and federalism took root, which has determined the design of the Constitution to create horizontal and vertical self-regulatory mechanisms that prevent the problem of tyranny. Next, I present how the negative perception…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sake Of Uniformity

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page

    I think the federal government should have more power over the state for the sake of uniformity. The federal government has to have power over the big issue like healthcare and security. As we all know it is constitutional that the federal government should have power over the states. I think if the states are given more powers, there could be a big division in America since each states would have sense of independence and would have their own rules and policies. Of course there are some small issues that the states need to have more power. Issues like marriage rules, and some local issues; those issues the states have to make their own rules without any intervention from the federal government. If we give more powers to the government, all…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States was founded on economic and political freedom. This freedom enables all our citizens to successfully pursue unlimited opportunities to use their god given talents to work, produce, invest, take risk, and grow wealthy while keeping the prosperous fruits of their enterprise. Here we have state governments that are “laboratories of government” and a notional government that has more autonomy than the state government. The state governments have some type of autonomy but the national government is stronger even if they are not close to those individuals the serve.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now let’s move on to creative federalism, which had a direct link to federal and local government, making it a weaker state form. Now for current federalism, the new federalism or competitive federalism. New federalism, is an overall competition of the governments in their relationships, making an overall competitive government. The many disadvantages of federal government can be summed up with it allowing inequality between states, in history it protected segregation and even slavery, and the blockage of national policies by the state. Federalism works for what it is, do I think states should have more power? Sure, but, knowing how people see their government on a state level It could be implosive. A check and balance system will always be a more logical concept then, either having…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays