Preview

Sake Of Uniformity

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
202 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sake Of Uniformity
I think the federal government should have more power over the state for the sake of uniformity. The federal government has to have power over the big issue like healthcare and security. As we all know it is constitutional that the federal government should have power over the states. I think if the states are given more powers, there could be a big division in America since each states would have sense of independence and would have their own rules and policies. Of course there are some small issues that the states need to have more power. Issues like marriage rules, and some local issues; those issues the states have to make their own rules without any intervention from the federal government. If we give more powers to the government, all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In politics everyone has a different opinion and it seems as if they never come to a compromise. This issue has been going on for many years now. As early as when this nation was first being built. Throughout history there have been times when the government has been at conflict. Many of these conflicts include the question as to who has more power and who should. If the states should or the national government. Two important cases in the past that have helped answer these questions are McCulloch vs. Maryland and Gibbons vs. Ogden. Both cases present conflicts that brought among state courts, which later end up being appealed in the Supreme Court and rule differently twice. Both cases ruling clear show a clear example as how the national government has a supremacy over the state government.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The powers extended to the state government are issue licenses, conduct local elections, regulate intrastate commerce, and provide for public health and safety. Sometimes there is a conflict between the state and federal governments in defining who an exclusive…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Federalism helps guard against tyranny because it lets both governments control each other, it prevents state governments from attacking other states, and it separates powers.“In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments” (Federalist Paper 51, Doc A). This is saying that the state government and the federal government share power and have different abilities. The two governments can act as checks on each other and the different things that they can do balances the power out so there cannot be tyranny. Not allowing states from having their own military prevents tyranny because if…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal government has powers that are more general and apply to the country as a whole, while the state government has powers specific to their area. According to Madison in Federalist Paper #51 written in 1788, federalism guards against tyranny because, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Document A) They are able to control their separate areas of government while still controlling the power of the other, ensuring that the other does not accumulate too much power and turn the country into a…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the constitution gave more power to the to the federal government rather than the states, Federalists and Anti-Federalists argued and fought over who should have more power. But it all had to come down to one or the other having more power.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federal Government has power over the United states. The federalist like and view the Federal government with most of the power. The…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two different plans were devised in a convention. The Federalists, the majority, implemented the Virginia plan, a statewide government based on the population. “The federalists supported the constitution and preferred a strong national government,” (pg. 57). The Anti-Federalists supported the New Jersey plan, where each state gets the same amount of representation. “The Anti-Federalist opposed the constitution and preferred a decentralized federal government; they took their name by default, in reaction to their better –organized opponents,” (pg. 57). Both parties agreed that government should be limited, but they disagreed on what the limits should be. I believe the Federalists will serve better with a government with broad powers that has…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The heart of the constitution is the National Supremacy Clause, which states that the constitution and federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land," meaning it is superior to the law of the states. I personally do not think that the federal laws should always supersede state laws, but there can be times in which the federal government wants the entire country on the same page and they can use their power to do so. The federal government should create laws that effects, and sometimes benefits the country as a whole. The states, on the other hand, should create laws that are unique to the people living in them that do not interfere with the laws set by the federal government.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    what is the importance of uniformity ,dress right dress, and discipline in the army? the importance of uniformity is to make everyone become and look equal. there are no differences between us, no separation because we are all a team. what is the point of uniformity, when a whole platoon is uniformed it shows discipline and being in uniform is one of the things that is part of the foundation of the army. Without uniformity there cannot be discipline, and then it turns into a chain reaction and destroying the foundation of the army. being in uniformity shows soldiers how they can do things together and how working together, we as people can do anything we want to accomplish. it also teaches soldiers that uniformity also shows responsibility that when things are disorganized nothing ever gets done, but when there are no differences holding back from completing the mission anything can be done 110%. Everything needs to also have discipline without having the discipline to fix something that is out of place when you know that it needs to be fix then everything would be jacked up. For example, if it were not for my leadership to keep us awake all night, night before the inspection cleaning everything making sure that everyone was truly dress right dress, checking all the wall lockers and bed display we may vary would have not passed the inspection on our own. the reason I say that for is because we all come from different up brings, some were taught discipline and others were brought up spoiled and had everything done for them and or never had anyone there to teach them how to keep thing neat or responsibility to make sure rules are completed 110%. when every is dress right dress it eliminates the difference that people have, it eliminates jealousy, deformity and also our disabilities and everything separates us from being the same. in the army, during our training we have to learn to put all of our differences aside and push through together through…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Explain the purpose of agreeing standards for your own work. Give at least two reasons.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It may not sound very American to say, but the constitution has it’s flaws. The checks and balances of the federal government are only as strong as the integrity of the officials in the three branches. A group with similar ideas can take over all three and make deals amongst themselves. The state governments need more power to keep a check on the National government.Another issue with a strong centra government is that people in different states have vastly different beleifs and ideologies, and many of them even if held by an entire state, may not make it to the federal government. Richard Henry Lee said “In this congressional legislature, a bare majority of votes can enact commercial laws; so that the representatives of the seven Northern States, as they will have a majority, can, by law, create the most oppressive monopoly upon the five Southern States, whose circumstances and productions are essentially different from those of theirs, although not a single man of these voters are the representatives of, or amenable to, the people of the Southern States.“ And that was just with differences in opinion between the limited number of states that existed them. Now, with 50 states and an ever rising population, there are more differences than ever. A stronger state government would result in more diversity between states, laws more fitting to the beliefs of individual states opinion. Then the small federal government would make sure that these…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History Study Notes

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I think states should have the power to nullify federal law because each state should have a say in what happens in it. Without this say each state would be exactly the same and there would be no use for having states.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the major aspects of politics is decision making. Politicians play a direct role in our lives by deciding what is best for the majority of the people. The common goal between all politicians is to make as many people happy while still thinking about what is best in the long run. It is impossible to please every single person in this country because we are all very different people. The United States of American is made up of different socioeconomic backgrounds, cultures, and lifestyles. They all have their different views and opinions about how this country should be run and by whom. A federalist government would have the ability to make the best decisions possible that benefit society as a whole. No…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays