Preview

Squirk

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Squirk
SQUIRK.com
After the gains of the 1960s and 1970s, the 1980s saw a gradual withdrawal away from Indigenous land rights. State and Commonwealth governments drew back from pursuing more legislation or granting land rights because of the lack of popular support in many areas of the country. The fear of losing at the polls began to take over from the idea of progress in the sphere of Indigenous rights.
This changed again in 1992 with the High Court judgement on the land mark Mabocase. Eddie Mabo was an Indigenous inhabitant of the Murray (Mer) Islands in the Torres Strait. He led a group of the Meriam people in a Supreme Court challenge against the Queensland government on the issue of land ownership. Their case stated;
'Since time immemorial the Torres Strait Islands of the Mer (known as Murray), Danar and Waier and their surrounding seas, seabeds, fringing reefs and adjacent islets have been continuously inhabited by people called the Meriam people'
The Queensland government reacted to the land rights claim by passing theQueensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act 1985 (Qld) which said that the Torres Strait Islander rights and claims had been extinguished in 1879 when the islands came under the rule of the Queensland government. It was a futile move to stop the Mer people's claim and in 1989 it was overruled as it contravened the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth). The case then came to the High Court of Australia – the highest court in the country.
In the High Court the Meriam people claimed continuous connection with their land. This was despite the fact it had been declared a possession of the New South Wales Colony in 1797 and then annexed by the Queensland government in 1879. The Queensland government said it had saved the Indigenous people of the Murray Islands from 'barbarism' and that the Crown had assumed all rights to the land in 1879. This assertion, however, was undermined by the fact that in 1913 the Queensland government had bought land from the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mabo Legal Case Study

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    QLD government passes the Declaratoy Act to retrosepectively extinguish native title on QLD’s costal islands.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mabo V State

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Doctrine of reception made the challenge of proving traditional ownership even more difficult unlike past cases such as the 1971 Gove land rights case. Murray Island was different Murray Island had distinct borders; it also had a mythical God called Malo (pronounced Mare). Malo is the source of Meriam heritage and culture. Malo can be seen as a form of Common Native Law. Land ownership, responsibilities; religious beliefs and ritual dances were all covered within Malo law providing the groundwork of an affective case against the state of Queensland. Malo has existed for as long as the Island and its Native People and was therefore a valid piece of evidence in both Mabo cases. Eddie Mabo was able to prove that land was passed down from father to son, generation to generation thanks to Malos law and tribal…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Redfern Jarjum Speech

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1778 captain James Cook discovered Australia claiming ‘Terra Nullius’ meaning land belonging to no one, since then Aboriginal Australians the original inhabitants of the land have struggled for land and social rights as well as the freedom from persecution and the capability to be educated. Redfern Jarjum College has opened its doors to 24 Aboriginal children who were unable to thrive in the mainstream education system with a program specially designed to accommodate their unique cultural needs.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 27th 1967, the Holt Liberal government held a referendum to determine whether or not two sections of the Constitution should be removed, as it discriminated against Aboriginal people. As a result, almost ninety-one percent of Australians voted ‘yes’ to alter these constitutional references. This significant event permitted the Commonwealth Government to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument analysis examines the article Recognise What? Problems with the campaign for constitutional recognition (Maddison, 2017). Published in the May/June issue of the Indigenous Law Bulletin, Maddison describes the process to recognise Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders as the first people of Australia in the constitution. The article explains this process through several accounts, resistance to the campaign and the role of the ‘Recognise’ campaign. Throughout the article, Maddison argues that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders should be recognised as the first people of Australia while acknowledging the problems with the campaign. The analysis will identify the main claims, evidence used to support these claims and the assumptions made by the author. Maddison uses several forms of evidence to support her 3 main claims and the underlying assumptions.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia’s attitude towards the rights and freedoms of Aboriginals has changed drastically from 1920 to the present. It is evident that Australia has made a greater effort throughout the years, to bridge the gap between the rights and of Aboriginals and the rest of Australia. This has been improved by the implementation of different policies such as the Protection policy, Assimilation, Integration, Self Determination and Reconciliation.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mabo Decision was the goal to overturn the idea of Terra Nullius so that Aboriginal peoples would be recognised…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mabo Decision was the outcome of the protest led by Eddie Mabo with a group of people from the Murray Islands in Torres Strait claiming that they had ownership of the islands before the white people settled. This act was very successful leading to the High Court deciding that the Murray Islanders were entitled to possession, occupation, enjoyment and use of the lands. The Mabo Decision overturned the concept of Terra Nullius (‘the land belonging to no one’) meaning the Australians recognised that the native title still…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the onset of the 1930s, white Australians were no longer attempting to provide the Indigenous population with an…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mabo Culture

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Queensland cases of 1982 is a prime example of how Australia’s political culture was an asset to the protection of human rights. In this case Eddie Mabo, an indigenous man from the Torres Strait argued that when land was taken from his people by the Australian government it had been done so in an improper procedure. When the High Court of Australia reviewed this they ruled that because “land rights where not properly acted upon” (Lecture 9, Zook), it was against the law so therefore the indigenous people’s still had a right to that land. With this case we see that Australia’s political culture made it possible for one of its indigenous groups to maintain their rights to their land after they had been taken away from them…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sample Case Note

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FN, a juvenile, was in legal custody charged with an offence. O’Brien, a policeman, asked Gillies, the first defendant, a stipendiary magistrate, for approval to take a blood sample from FN pursuant to s 31(3)(b) of the Juvenile Justice Act 1983 (NT). Gillies refused the application, holding that he was not satisfied that blood was included in the description 'material from the body' . O’Brien consequently went to the Supreme Court to have Gillies’s decision re-examined (certiorari) and a writ issued commanding him to approve the taking of blood from the juvenile (mandamus).…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Maori of New Zealand

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    the island had a native populace just as Australia had had. But one thing was…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    English speaking countries

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    James Cook discovered Australia on the 20th of April 1770. The original inhabitants of Australia were people called Aborigines. This name they gained from British people in 1788. The each group of Aborigines had its land and language. They travelled to different parts of their land to find food and water, they ate plants and fruits and caught animals and fish. After 1788 their life suddenly began to change. Life was very difficult for the Aborigines: they couldn’t own land, couldn’t get jobs, their children couldn’t go to school with white children. Nowadays it is better.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    63. 64. 65. Walters v Transitional Local Council of Port Elizabeth & Another (2000) 21 ILJ 2723 (LC). Whitehead v Woolworths (Pty) Ltd (1999) 20 ILJ 2133 (LC). Woolworths (Pty) Ltd v Whitehead (2000) 21 ILJ 571 (LAC).…

    • 76555 Words
    • 307 Pages
    Good Essays