Preview

Spartacus Film Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Spartacus Film Analysis
After watching the movie Spartacus (1960) and doing some research I found the movie to be both historical accurate and inaccurate. But I'm not going to nitpick the hole movie instead I would like to talk about some of the major details that are fairly well known; like how the Roman army fought in battle. The Roman army was know for its discipline, organization, and innovation in both weapons and tactics. First lets talk about the Roman army and how it was structured and organized. The Roman army was divided up into legions; with the soldiers being know as legionaries. Each legion was made up of 10 cohorts, with a normal cohort contained 480 soldiers. The first cohort in every legion was larger than the other coherts, which was made up of …show more content…
The Romans would also give careful consideration to where the battle should be fought. The Roman commanders would like to try and get the higher ground when possible; and would also like to ensure that the sun and wind were behind their soldiers. Romans military were extremely good at siege tactics. Roman engineers developed several different devices that could throw stones and javelins long distances; the most important of these were the catapulta, ballista, ad onager. In the movie Spartacus the deployment of the Roman army is very interesting. In the battle scene you see a deployment of a legion in a quincunx formation (checker board pattern) this shows the discipline and organization of the Roman army. As the Roman army comes closer to Spartacus' slave army the front legion starts to form a solid front line and they would continue moving forward. As the front group is lining up you can see the back legionaries coming together into one group. As an opponent seeing this it can be quiet intimating. While there were some discrepancies in the final battle the director, Stanley Kubrick, did a good job at keeping it as accurate as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spartacus was an important leader in Rome. He was born in 109 BC and died in 71 BC on a battlefield near Petelia Italy. His occupation was a Gladiator. He is best known for leading a slave uprising against Rome. Spartacus was of the the Thracian nationality. He joined the Roman army when he was young. When he tried to leave the army, he was caught and sold into slavery. He was then forced to be a gladiator. A gladiator was a man trained to fight wild animals and other gladiators in an arena. In 73 BC seventy gladiators with Spartacus as their leader, escaped the gladiator school. They fled to Mount Vesuvius near the city of Pompeii gathering slaves and weapons. Rome sent an army of 3,000 men led by Claudius Glaber. Spartacus surprised the…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar also deployed in three lines. He arrayed his men 6 men deep. He rested his left on the marshland of the river and he positioned all his cavalry on the right, against Pompey's squadrons. Behind them he hid light troops, carrying javelins and other weapons, in anticipation of Pompey's cavalry. Caesar himself commanded his cavalry. He also had 2,000 legionaries as reserves. He posted the notorious tenth legion on his right under Sulla, with the understrength eighth and possibly the ninth on his left under Antonius. In the center he designated Domitius as the commanding officer. According to his accounts, he had 80 cohorts on the battlefield, about 22,000…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legionaries carried small javelins called pilum and would throw them en masse as the formations got close to each other. The tips were made of a soft metal, with the rest of it being made of wood that was designed to bend after impact so as to render it useless and would not allow the enemy to throw them back. These javelins would often impact enemy shields and embed themselves into them rendering the shield useless due to the heavy, awkward weight of the javelin sticking out, striping the enemy of some their protection. Closer in the Romans relied on a short, very well tapered, stabbing sword to attack their enemies with called a gladius. Legionnaires were also equipped with a small dagger but this is more for use outside of combat but could probably be used as a last resort if the need…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the film, The Empire Strikes Back, Luke unconsciously follows in his father’s footsteps by being corrupted by anger and impatience in his training with Yoda, his encounter with his own soul in the cave on Dagobah, and in his showdown with Darth Vader in the carbon freezing chamber in Cloud City. First, Luke subconsciously follows in his father’s footsteps when he exhibits anger and impatience in his training with Yoda. After the battle of Hoth, Luke travels to Dagobah with his trusty droid companion, R2-D2, and the two crash land on Dagobah in search of the infamous Jedi Master, Yoda. Luke sets up a camp right outside the crashed X-wing Starfighter, and as he prepares his camp, a strange creature appears and the two converse. Luke tells…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suetonius Battle Analysis

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They expected to easily slice the outnumbered enemy into pieces, but they were unnoticeably channeled into a tight pack (). The Romans had two great advantages on their side, they were much more skilled in the tactics and arts of battle and they also had the position on the defensive. Roman soldiers were accustomed to defending themselves while attacking fortified positions by forming up in a tight phalanx formation, the men positioned shoulder to shoulder, their shields creating one great continuous shield, a mobile walled fortification. Boudicca’s spear throwers, hurling their weapons uphill, were wholly ineffective. The spears that made contact with the Roman force bounced harmlessly off the impenetrable shield barrier.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman army before 264BC was a citizens’ army, comprised of farmers and the population, with very little to no full time soldiers. Every man was expected to provide his own gear, and as such it was very difficult to recruit the poor or slaves to fight, and when they were recruited, it was at the expense of the state. Another problem with a citizens’ army is that they are not full time soldiers, and many are often inexperienced in combat, and lacked the training necessary to be truly superior to any opponent.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning of Sparta, in 900 BC, until their fall, in 192 BC, they were the superior fighting warriors across the Mediterranean sea and in the European vicinity. The spartans were the strongest, most fierce, and most feared people in Europe at the time with a highly militarized lifestyle and society. The spartans were the ultimate “super soldiers” of their time, the reason for this being, from the age of 7 all boys were required to go to military training at the Agoge and train there until the age of 20, they also had unique and extremely effective formations, ways of protection, and weapons (shields, long spears, etc.) that would help them in any scenario one could think of.…

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King the Clutch

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the improvement in catapults the Greek fortification developed high towers with shuttered windows in its top, where anti-personnel arrow shooters resided to defend the forts. Projectiles used in catapults included arrows and stones. History of catapults reveals that catapults were used by Romans between third and second century BC against Syracuse, Macedon, Sparta and Aetolia.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were different groups of the roman army. The 8 soldiers that made up a tent were called a conterberium. 1 conterberium was in charge of a conterberium.Ten conterberium is called a century.6 centuries will make up a chort. Ten cohorts would make up a legion. A legion is about 6,000 soldiers. In 123 BC the roman government started providing the legion with equipment. There was not a lot of armor sets so some men wore different armor. One of the main reasons rome was powerful was because of its army. The roman army was advanced for it’s time. A legionnaire had to be a roman citizen and had to be 17 or older. A legionnaire signed up for 25 years of service and old legionnaires retired together. An auxiliary soldier was someone who was not a roman citizen. they often fought on the front lines. The roman catapults were called orangers and the roman army cold march 20 miles a day with their armor on. That is why I Gave the roman empire an +A on prepare for a common…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    eager for more land. After 20 long years of war the Messenians were forced to…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Blade Runner Film Analysis

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Cinema is a set of landscapes accompanied by a story. However, landscapes tell a story of their own. They tell more than just the story, but the underlying thoughts behind the film. This can be seen in Blade Runner by Ridley Scott, THX 1138 by George Lucas, and Children of Men by Alfonso Cuaron, as the landscapes help develop the complexity of the story. The directors of these films use setting and landscape to express and contribute to the development of the main argument of each film.…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been said that events in history have an intricate web of relationships, causes, and effects. This is particularly true of the fall of the Western Roman Empire, as supported by the many books published speculating different reasons why the empire collapsed. They were a people of discipline, pride, and honor. At its peak of success, Rome was the military powerhouse of the world. However, many factors lead to its instability, and eventual demise.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Gladiators

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome’s military might have been small but it was mighty, it had excellent military tactics and strong military generals. This contributes to why they kept on winning many battles. The fights that were won prisoners of war were taken. Many of the prisoners were then sold into the gladiatorial school and tried to earn their freedom, fighting in the gladiator games.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pivotal battle of marathon describes the struggle in broad strokes. The Athenian tribes arrayed themselves “in an unbroken line” and “charged the enemy at a run” after they found the portents favorable with a sacrifice. Then again at Thermopylae the descriptions of the actually fighting itself are rather vague. The greek success is attributed to longer spears and the advantage of being in a narrow defile. The most detailed part of the action itself comes from describing how the Spartans would feint retreat only to turn about again “and inflict heavy losses on them.” This does not inform readers much on a Greek way of fighting or the details of their tactics. These accounts do reinforce Everett Wheeler’s conclusions that the Hoplite was a very flexible warrior, contrary to the heavy phalangite infantry stereotype. In both cases the military lessons are general and perhaps obvious. They involve the placement of the army and a brief description of why it worked, such as having longer…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays