Preview

Soul In David Hume's 'Do We Survive Death'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
780 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Soul In David Hume's 'Do We Survive Death'
In this chapter author raises many important arguments. Socrates argumentation in regards to the shamelessness and effortlessness of a spirit and eats it sealing turn around. Author’s contrasts everlasting life and restoration making highlight that the first doesn't require that God made soul in any case. Conceivable proof for a life following death are close passing background, resurrection, psychic correspondence with the dead. He disavows any probability of supernatural occurrence's presence citing contention against wonder of David Hume. In the chapter "Do We Survive Death" by James Rachel’s quotes' perspectives about the presence of soul. Socrates insists that every person is made out of a physical body and a nonphysical soul. For a man …show more content…
Why aren't children conceived with grown-up identities? Why doesn't the infant have the old individuals' information and experience? Then as I was reading thought came to my mind that why do we have soul? One last question is where did all new soul came from? I believe that if the child is born with the adult personalities then there will be no difference between adult and child. Being a child is the best memory any human can have. If baby is born with everything then I don’t think there is any need for mom, dad, and teachers. Because god has created this three people for baby’s better …show more content…
The same thing applies to the psyche. We think and feel and act, yet there is not, notwithstanding musings and emotions and activities, an uncovered element, the psyche or soul, which does or endures these events. There was yesterday one individual whose sentiments I can recall, and that individual I view as myself of yesterday; in any case, indeed, which are presently recollected and are viewed as a component of the individual who now remembers them. All that constitutes a man is a progression of encounters associated by memory and by specific likenesses of the sort we call propensity. Assuming, along these lines, we are to trust that a man survives demise, we should trust that the recollections and propensities which constitute the individual will keep on being shown in another arrangement of occurrences. We human are really intelligent that we have now reach moon. Some things I hope we can’t find ever, such as whether or not we can survive after death. Why God made such things such a way. Human are never stratifies with their knowledge. Some people have that kind of attitude that they have to know everything. I think like come on, you don’t have to know everything every time to live this life happily. Just be happy with what you have. Some people doesn’t even have the luxury, time and family. I feel like I don’t want to find the answer for Do we survive after death or not? I would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Module 3 Chapters 13 15

    • 1933 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to this cycle individuals don’t have their own souls. It is believed that there is no…

    • 1933 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -Aquinas: Soul is body, there is no body without the soul, sould makes it exist as a body…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can remember how when I was young I believed death to be a phenomenon of the body; now I know it to be merely a function of the mind−and that of the minds of the ones who suffer the bereavement. The nihilists say it is the end; the fundamentalists, the beginning; when in reality it is no more than a single tenant or family moving out of a tenement or a town (42).…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his essay "The Myth of Immortality," Clarence Darrow explains his belief that life after death is a hoax and backs up his logic with logical reasoning. Darrow finds it hard to believe that life exists after death simply because there are no facts to prove that it exists. He states that "if people really believed in a beautiful, happy, glorious land waiting after death why don't they hasten themselves to it." Darrow also shows his discern in his views for the soul questioning that if we do have a soul, when is it created in the natural process of reproduction? He also questions "If a man has a soul that persists after death, that goes to a heaven of the blessed or to a hell of the damned, where are those places?" Moreover, he goes into detail and explains his reasoning against the resurrection of the body. He states the mere thought of such ideas beggars reason, ignores facts, and enthrones blind faith, wild dreams, hopeless hopes, and cowardly fears as sovereign of the human mind, despite the fact the bible clearly states that Jesus has risen from the dead and ascended into heaven. Darrow moves on into the scientific reasoning stating that people take comfort in the law that matter and force cannot be destroyed, meaning their soul lives on forever. Darrow continues and says that there is no proof that memory and consciousness exists after death. Even more, Darrow continues with his statement "We are assured that without faith, life is only desolation and despair." Or in other words, Darrow says that people "create" a place that exists after death in order to ease the natural fears. In conclusion Darrow states "we should be more kind to each other and make our lives easier for we live a common life and die a common…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These larger questions of the soul and the mind and their existence beyond human death has been debated and explored throughout time. Yet, we lack hard evidence to support the idea of the existence of the soul and its continued ‘life’ beyond the death of the body. Individuals have not returned from the grave to transmit this knowledge in any manner that can be tested, studied, and deemed true. What a soul is and why we have it is unique to the human experience. The Abrahamic traditions defines the soul as the “I” that lives within our body and acts through it. The soul is what makes each individual unique according to theologian Thomas Aquinas. Noted philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, all argued that the psyche or, the soul, was the “crown of the logical facilities”. Yet the mind is responsible for processing our human experiences and storing them as learned experiences that shape and mold our continued existence.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three opposing arguments will be examined for the resurrection of Christ. Many arguments have been made against the resurrection throughout the years, but the three most popular theories will be explained. After the opposing arguments are explained, four arguments for the resurrection will be presented to refute those claims.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for this to be, Socrates must go into depth about the soul, because that is where we are affected by madness and find our happiness. This is the connecting link that leads one explanation of love as madness to a discussion of the soul. The main idea focuses on the soul being the driving force that leads a person here on earth and in the afterlife. It is always in motion and as a self-mover has no beginning, it cannot be destroyed. According to Socrates, the soul is immortal, divine, and infinite. It is the soul that presides over all aspects of life. The proof is in Socrates' own definition of the soul that goes beyond all living and non-living things in both the human life and the afterlife. I believe that Socrates uses very direct, obvious dialogue about the nature of the soul to be as perfectly clear as possible about the main idea of the text. The soul is something that is unbreakable, immortal, and generates all human action. Socrates outlines how the soul is the basis for all that he speaks about; the essential lesson which all his speeches are based…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just as universal as birth, death is an inevitable fate that has threatened mankind for their entire existence. Countless philosophers, authors, scholars, religions, and theorists have grappled with the greatly debated topic of the afterlife. N. J. Richardson eloquently described this struggles as the, “beliefs about what happened to a person at the point of death and afterwards were never fixed and always remained a subject for debate” (Adams). Contributing influential opinions on the afterlife, the Greek and Hebrew cultures have wrestled with many concepts in order to arrive at a rough understanding of their individual views of life after death. These two dominant cultures have what appears to be a drastically different stance upon the time…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, this essay will offer analysis of the dying man’s objection to the existence of God; this will include analysis on the dying man’s arguments in favour of empiricism and materialism. The deist…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Throughout history, there has been a variety of opinions and theories regarding the body and the soul. The two most common known philosophies regarding the body and the soul are Plato’s theories and Buddhism. Each have their own ways of viewing how the body and the soul connect to each other and how they function during a life. Buddhism, an old eastern religion that believes in no monotheistic creator and reincarnation. Buddhist’s also have their own notion that creates a connection between the soul and the body. Despite the differences between the two philosophies, I will argue that there are greater similarities between Plato’s and Buddhism’s notions of the soul. Throughout this essay, the ideas of parallel interpretations of the soul, individual…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays