Preview

Society And State, And Aristotle's Theory Of Wellbeing And Development

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1029 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Society And State, And Aristotle's Theory Of Wellbeing And Development
Human being formed society and state for their wellbeing and development. The family, village, society and the state is formed in natural process as described by Aristotle. The evolution of state has arrived from the welfare activities carried out by the kings and their institutions. In a society, the state becomes the governing institution which takes care of its people with particular emphasis on weaker sections, governs the society and its institutions through rule, law and order and allow its people to participate in smooth function of the society. Every community exists for the sake of some good for themselves and State will work for the betterment of people in a normal process (Zarri, 1948; Trevor, 1995). Plato viewed the main goal of a society and state is to …show more content…
Therefore, people were forced to create a group to govern them and resolve their problem. They created powerful body through voluntary social contract to ensure peace and natural rights of every individual in the society (Zarri, 1948). When there is peace and protection of right of everybody in a society and state, people would be able to do things for their wellbeing and development. Marxists had very critical view on state from structural and class aspects. State is an irrational abstract system of political domination; it doesn’t allow the social nature of man and involvement in public life. It is not an independent and sovereign political entity, which is used to meet the interest of rulers and elites. Therefore, the states should be ruled by proletariat through revolution to empower people (Engels, 1844b in Tabor, ----; Joseph, 1982). Accordingly, the weaker section after coming to power, will work for development of people. Ross (1937) further credited the view of Aristotle and argued that ¨The state does not exist merely by convention but is rooted in human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    government they want to live happily. As Aristotle said, every human has the capacity to distinguish between what is good or bad for the city and it is something that came since a person was born with their natural instinct. They just need the practice and that is the public education that in the city is implemented with virtues. Aristotle is also concerned that human beings are not perfect, or excellent, or always be good, a person can be bad also and it is the natural sense of life. “It follows that there cannot be a single excellence common to all the citizens” (Aristotle 92). Aristotle studies the human behavior in order to create this functional constitution with the needs of the people and the weakness of the human to heal every aspect…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though Aristotle does not explicitly speak of meaning, he surely considered the reality of impartial values and meaning. While his primary concern was on the happiness gained by accounting for these values, he does not say that the happy life means the meaningful. However, we can infer that he thought that the good life and the meaningful life are equals. Therefore, Aristotle’s plan in order to live a good life is understandable, and is a guide to a meaningful life.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Engels believed that the Communistic form of government should be implemented because privately owned goods (by citizens) would corrupt the good qualities of the owners - by encouraging selfishness (Dagger).…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx believed that all humans were radical and that this directly influenced their organization of government. Similarly, to Locke, Marx classified society into two groups; The Bourgeois and The Proletarians. Marx believed that a ruling class was inevitable, “we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold of gradation of social ranks,” (Marx 9). All though, Marx sees no way to exist without social ranks, he also believes that in this case the bourgeois will join the proletarians in living a good life, “a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeoisie ideologists,” (Marx…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The origin and role of the proletariat in fostering the end of exploitative, class-based society is discussed by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels in their seminal work The Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels advance communism as the doctrine that outlines the proletariat revolution and liberation.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx supported the previous statement by introducing the idea of “dictatorship of the proletariat” in his book the “The Communist Manifesto”. He most probably used the word “dictatorship” to emphasize the absolute rule of only one class that will automatically destroy the other classes and therefore establish a classless society that would share the same values and interests. So as to achieve it, the bourgeoisie class needs to reach a state of “consciousness” that will free them from their desires of private property. In this way, the “dictatorship” is a form of rule that makes the government just a tool in the hands of the proletariat that is vital to free every person (regardless of class) from his needs and achieve self-satisfaction and self-fulfillment by working towards the common interests of the society, rather than an oppressive regime which suppresses personal freedom (Kolakowski 1978). Accordingly, Stalin is the framework of the Russian Communism in which center is placed the class of the Russian workers. He wanted to unite the people and destroy the differences in the society that resulted in social, economical and political conflicts: “organize the…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English notes

    • 1812 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Depicts a world where the state organized to insure happiness, community and stability. Citizens are condition to maintain the status quo…

    • 1812 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wanting to make a person happy and free, it is completely subordinated to the state. On the other hand, talking about the correct structure of the state, he looked and looked in an idealized, they coined the past and could not be seen in the development of a civil society of the future of humanity.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They took power from these people and finally the society is divided into two separate classes directly facing each other; bourgeois and proletarians. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 2) Now, according to Karl Marx, it's the time for the proletarians to take power from the bourgeois and create a new world order. In the document, Karl Marx also argued that in the process of doing their job in wiping out the feudal system, bourgeois created the system that will lead to their own collapse, which is full of exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 4) Hence, like every time when there is a strong divide between classes in the society, it is the time for a revolution to occur. It is the necessary step for the society to progress further, and it can only be attained by "the forcibly overthrow of all existing conditions." (The Communist Manifesto, p.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, as a presentation of what they believed to be an ideal Communist social and economic revolution. According to the authors, in order to avoid social oppression, every individual should be at the same level. Although Karl Marx’s and Friedrich Engels’ equal social standards beliefs could have prevented oppression of wealthier people over less wealthy ones back in time, today it could lead to an abolition of elements such as economical advantage and leading powers, because there would be no distinction of citizens based on capabilities and no opportunity for anybody to be superior to someone else.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism Crime & Deviance

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This essay will evaluate the Marxist theory that the ruling class in society decides the law and enforces it, to reflect their own interests.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Ideology Essay

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Through out the past there have been many different forms of political ideology. With all theses different types of government you have to wonder sometimes which one of theses forms of government would be the best to run the ideal society. In this paper I will compare and contrast; liberalism, social democracy, fascism, communism, and anarchy. Also I will give my opinion on which one of these forms of government would be the most ideal to run a modern day county or society. Before I can begin comparing and contrasting we need to have a working understanding of all the political ideology’s stated above.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. This relates to the previous reading by going into deeper detail about the outcomes of Marxism by also comparing to social constructivism, clarifying that a nation’s environment in which it acts, is social, ideational, and…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato identifies political justice as harmony in a structured political body. An ideal state consists of three main classes of people: producers, auxiliaries, and the guardians (rulers); a state is just when relations between these three classes are right. Justice is a principle of specialization: a principle that requires that each person fulfils the societal role to which nature fitted him or her, and does not interfere in any other business.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays