Social Brain Hypothesis Essay

I have realized that whenever someone is asked for some reason the difference that we humans have with animals, most say something like our intelligence, or that we communicate with each other and they do not. Social brain hypothesis is a proposal that strives to explain that in comparison to all vertebrates, the primates have naturally larger brain size to the body mass. This theory goes ahead to demonstrate that the primates acquire the wider brains as a result of their struggle to manage their complex social systems. According to La Mattrie the human being has always tried to understand it in reference to animals but there is another very current reference machine. However, the relationship with both referents is not the same as the human being is evolutionarily linked to animals. Instead, the machine is a human product. This hypothesis may appear to fall short of explanation on the social behavior of birds, which also live in a somewhat complicated social class. Recent research has proved that the social brain hypothesis takes different forms in different categories of animals. The theory cannot be used in a comparison of animals of vast biological disparities. The research may only hold when
What guarantees that an animal is intelligent is the socialization with humans and at the same time the coexistence with its own species in a natural environment. The social brain hypothesis, researchers have proposed that the animals that live in high social structures have better brain development than their counter parts of different species that live in unity. This explains why primates and most specifically man have greater brain capacity than the rest of the animals. An experimental research maintains that the species of social animals are highly engaged in carrying out their social activities, trying to engage and accommodate one another and the entire