Preview

Snapple

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
843 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Snapple
The brand that we know of today, Snapple, originally was manufactured in 1972 as an all-natural apple juice business in Greenwich Village. Arnie Greenberg, Leonard Marsh, and Hyman Golden founded the Snapple Brand outsourcing production and product development building their network of distributers across New York City. Despite many product flavors that were failures, premium pricing balanced everything out and Snapple was still able to generate revenues. Unlike Snapple, from 1972 to 1993, much start up juice companies had failed or were sold off to larger distributers. Howard Stern, Rush Limbaugh, and Wendy Kaufman were a huge part of the success. The original owners sold the company to Thomas H. Lee Company in 1992, who then sold it to Quaker Oats in 1993. Quaker owned Gatorade and thought that by purchasing Snapple it would be as successful as the sports drink once they started stocking grocery store shelves. Unfortunately, Business Week tells us that this acquisition proved to be one of the major U.S. business disasters of the 1990’s. The brand lost 1.4 billion dollars in value under Quaker’s ownership as well as the distribution channel power it had established years prior.
Four years later, Ken Gilbert and Mike Weinstein of Triarc, used research from a NJ group, Deutsch, Inc., to assess the company in hopes of setting priorities and to reverse the downward slide Quaker had left the company in. Ultimately, Weinstein had hopes of reinvigorating the brand, though Gilbert was hesitant. Deutsch had researched the brand and found solutions such as demarcating Snapple as a category set aside from any others like diet soda and chocolate milk. Weinstein felt that Snapple was an upbeat drink and that they should keep the ball rolling on an upward track to success.
Primary goals for Triarc in the short term go along with some of the business decisions the company made earlier when it was known for its “all natural” beverages. Increasing sales volume

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Dr Pepper Snapple Group became a publicly-traded and stand-alone company on the New York Stock Exchange on May 7, 2008. This was the result of Cadbury, plc spin off in which Americas Beverages group of business entities was held by Cadbury Schweppes. DPS integrated business model enables them to market more than 50 brands of premium beverages consisting of teas and juices; waters and mixers, and carbonated soft drinks as they manage the entire value chain from innovation to the shelves of stores (Drpeppersnapplegroup.com, 2014).…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snapples drinks are divided up into the following: Diet, Regular, Tea, Juice drink, and Additional flavors. Snapple’s equity comes from it’s “quirky, everyman vibe” and it’s “differentiation and new taste experiences”. The drink is viewed as somewhat of a luxury good, including natural ingredients, and claiming it’s “the best stuff on earth”. Not being associated with big corporations is good for Snapple’s brand and after its sale to Cadbury, Snapple proved to have brand equity again. Snapple is a fresher and healthier choice as compared to sodas and energy drinks. The product variety is large as each category of Snapple has numerous flavors and sweetness…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Andrew Barker, brand manager for Snapple beverages at the Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., has been charged with the task of assessing a new market opportunity for the brand. The decision has been made by senior company management to explore a new energy beverage as a part of a corporate business strategy to focus on opportunities in high-growth and high-margin beverage businesses. Barker must determine whether or not a profitable market opportunity exists for a new energy beverage brand to be produced, marketed, and distributed by the company. He must then make a recommendation as to whether or not the company should introduce a new branded product into the energy beverage market. Any proposal to enter into the beverage market requires a marketing strategy for a branded energy drink, including a first-year sales and profit projection. It is important to note that Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. is the only major domestic nonalcoholic beverage company in the United States without a significant branded energy drink of its own. In order to come to an educated conclusion, Barker must assess Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.’s current situational analysis, analyze the energy beverage market in the United States, and consider the market opportunities available to the company. The problem facing the Snapple brand is how to maintain its competitive position given an environmental threat (energy beverages). They must determine whether or not it is strategically effective to enter the energy beverage market, while at the same time preserving profitability and its customer base.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Icore Strategy Report

    • 4994 Words
    • 20 Pages

    At the Mountain View Beverage Company, we strive to be an industry leader in the soft-drink market, including fruit drinks, soda pop, ready-to-drink teas, and organic high-energy drinks. Our corporate image of being a friendly and sensible player in American business is made possible by our strong marketing program and our own bottling plants and distribution fleet. We are always attuned to the needs of local eateries, cafés, and coffee shops, as this is where we developed such a loyal customer base. As our customer base continues to grow and support us, we will be able to move our products into grocery and convenience stores. We will continue to expand our business so that our stockholders can remain pleased with our product quality and the company’s managerial vision, marketing plans, and operating efficiency. We will continue to supply our customers with beverages that are a healthy, vibrant source of drinking pleasure because at the Mountain View Beverage Company, we want to be “On Your Side” in today’s complex world.…

    • 4994 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They operate with 21 manufacturing facilities, 115 distribution centers employing around 19,000 people across North America but continue to utilize a larger work force with hundreds of third party bottling companies (Dr Pepper Snapple Group). Headquartered in Plano, Texas their President and CEO Larry Young made $9,616,891 in 2014, $5,999,932 in equity, $3,206,582 in cash and a remaining $410,395 in an unspecified “other” category of earnings. In 2014 (“Larry Young”) said that the Dr Pepper Snapple Group owes much of its past success to their many mergers working to make the company bigger and stronger than ever, but some failures have been in their advertisements. When they launched their Dr Pepper 10 campaign their slogan was “not for women” because of the 10 manly calories in it (Carville). Despite this slightly anti-feminist slip in their marketing the behemoth company has continued to be successful and will continue to distribute fizzy fruity sweet drinks to the people for a very long…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our competitors will be large producers of soft drinks such as Coca-Cola with Minute Maid products and PepsiCo with Tropicana products. The Coca-Cola Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc hold respectively 13.1% and 6.4% of the fruits juices market. Coca-Cola is the world’s biggest soft drink company with more than 500 brands, including 17 brands that produce more than a billion dollars in income (Slcher, 2015). PepsiCo cl has 22 brands that create more than a billion dollars in income. Both organizations spend tremendous measures of cash on advancement, publicizing and advertising, and on fortifying their transportation system. According to Grewal and Levy, since 2010 Coca-Cola and its packaging partners have put more than $50 billion in new offices, dispersion framework, gear, and retail client enactments. PepsiCo spent in 2013 about 5.9% of its net income on promoting and showcasing (Grewal & Levy, 2010). Both organizations have wide geographic visibility around the country and internationally. Thus, LaMarquise will be threatening companies such as Sunmet, Tree Top, etc. which are our direct competitors in the market of concentrated fruit juices. So, through our strategy, we show our product as unique and different from other companies’ product (Bailey,…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Pepper Snapple is a smaller competitor to Coca-Cola. However, Pepsico is Coca-Cola’s rival competitor due to its relative size. Both have global recognized brands that compete in product differentiation instead of pricing. For instance, a 12-ounce can of Coke is usually priced similar to a 12-ounce can of Pepsi. Nonetheless, Coke attempted to change the taste of its product in the 1980s (i.e., product differentiation). Unfortunately, the New Coke was rejected by the public and reintroduced the original Coke as Coke Classic. Finally, due to the recent decrease in buyer demand, there has been an increase in competitive rivalry between the two brands. As a result, rivalry among competing sellers has…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Drpepper

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    4. Based on the information, I have conducted the financial review of DPS’s performance as this following:…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Pepper Snapple Group

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Their headquarters is in Plano, Texas, and Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. is a leading provider of flavored carbonated soft drinks and non-carbonated beverages. They have built their success through strategically acquiring beverage brands and then building them into leaders in their category. Examples of their notable acquisitions included the Duffy-Mott Company (later known as Mott’s), Canada Dry, Sunkist, Crush and Sun Drop.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snapple Case

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    - Another problem is the centralized product development, purchasing, inventory and shipping activities at headquarters. Because Snapple operates in several different markets – juices, sport drinks, tea, all with different needs in…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nantucket Nectars Analysis

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before we start with analyzing the options, it is very important to understand their business strategy, along with the strengths of their high quality product. By selling their products, First and Scott wanted to sell an image. Considering their innovative marketing strategy, combined with the catchy advertisement campaigns and the provided “story,” they were able to create a market of their own. In addition to this, they provide a very high quality, using pure cane sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup and using four times the natural juice compared to the other brands were using. But considering their size, it was difficult for them to compete in larger markets with larger firms with an immense amount of resources. But, through creating a product and company so different than others, they were able to stay successful in the market, with a goal of expanding their scale of operations. These characteristics of the company proves why Pepsi and Ocean Spray wanted to buy-out the company. But the tough decision here is whether or not sell-out the company.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Characters – Docker’s focused their ads on being about the “average Joe” and created relatable advertising focusing on the sociability of mean wearing the pants (Keller, 2008b, pg. 207). Whereas, Snapple used tactics to differentiate the company from its competitors with successful campaigns centering on Wendy Kaufman and later signing spokesmen like Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern (Keller, 2008b). The use of these characters contributed to the memorability and meaningfulness of the brand. Wendy, Rush and Howard helped Snapple to break through the marketplace clutter to enhance likeability and create fun and interesting brand perceptions about Snapple (Keller, 2008a, pg. 159).…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    snap

    • 8008 Words
    • 24 Pages

    In 1997, Quaker sold Snapple to Triarc Beverage Group for $300 million. Triarc faced a number of challenges, including reversing the sales slide, revamping the distribution system, and creating new products that will enable growth. Most importantly, Triarc had to find a way to reconnect the brand with its consumers. Triarc successfully resurrected the Snapple brand, and in 2000 sold Snapple to Cadbury Schweppes for $1.45 billion. Cadbury Schweppes then faced the challenge of maintaining Snapple’s brand strength in an increasingly competitive beverage environment.…

    • 8008 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr Pepper Industry Analysis

    • 5190 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Dr Pepper Snapple Group can choose to offer a new energy drink product. (Product/Market Focus and Value Proposition)…

    • 5190 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr Pepper

    • 8550 Words
    • 35 Pages

    Larry Young, President and CEO of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (DPS) seemed to be on a roll. Named 2010 Beverage Executive of the Year by Beverage Industry Magazine, he led the company through three very difficult economic years since it separated from the London-based food and beverage giant Cadbury Schweppes. Reflecting on that time, he chuckled, “There couldn’t have been a worse year to go public.”1 Triggered by the collapse of mortgage-backed securities, the recession froze the credit markets and led to unprecedented commodities prices. In spite of adverse economic conditions and fierce competition, the company managed to obtain modest growth in sales in 2010. Perhaps most satisfying of all was the recent turnaround of the Snapple Brand, which had been struggling for many years.2 Sales volume for the brand grew 10 percent in 2010, fueled by new products, packages and distribution. In addition, Dr Pepper, Canada Dry, Crush, Mott’s and Hawaiian Punch all experienced increases in demand. A healthy cash flow allowed the company to pay down its debt, increase dividends and repurchase shares. A question remained as to whether the company was simply taking advantage of some fairly obvious opportunities that it could not pursue when it was under Cadbury Schweppes ownership, or whether this number three…

    • 8550 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays