Preview

Six Perspectives of Justice

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Six Perspectives of Justice
Understanding the Perspectives of Justice
Defining the Due Process Perspective

There are six perspectives of justice; Crime Control Perspective, Rehabilitation Perspective, Due Process Perspective, Nonintervention Perspective, Equal Justice Perspective, and Restoration Perspective. The Due Process Perspective is the most ideal justice perspective that has been implemented over time. In order to more understand that biases take into account the other six perspectives.
Crime control perspective, those believe that the proper role of the justice system is to prevent crime through the judicious use of criminal sanctions. Because the public is outraged by violent crimes, it demands an efficient justice system that hands out tough sanctions to those who choose to violate the law Rehabilitation perspective, that view crime as an expression of frustration and anger created by social inequality and see the justice system as a means of caring for and treating people who have been the victims of this inequity. According to this view, crime can be controlled by giving people the means to improve their lifestyle and helping them overcome any personal and or psychological problems caused by their life circumstances
Due process perspective, believe that the justice system should be dedicated to providing fair and equitable treatment to those accused of crime. This means providing impartial hearings, competent legal counsel, evenhanded treatment, and reasonable sanctions to ensure that no one suffers from racial, religious, or ethnic discrimination and that their basic constitutional rights are respected
Nonintervention Perspective, those believe that justice agencies should limit their involvement with criminal defendants. They believe that regardless of whether intervention is designed to punish people or to treat them, the ultimate effect of any involvement is harmful and will have long-term negative consequences.
Equal Justice Perspective, believe that the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fourth is the Balanced and Restorative Justice Model. This model focuses its’ attention on the three different but equal goals. The first goal focuses on the accountability of the juvenile for the crimes committed against the…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime control model places emphasis on using more police and harder court sentences to help deter and hopefully reduce crime. It utilizes the powers held by the government to protect the people, with limited regards to their rights (Sociology Index, 2013). It favors tougher punishment to crimes and on the criminals that perform them. Crime Control model argues that sometimes, persons should give up their rights, to protect and benefit society as a whole. Often people are assumed to be guilty until proven innocent.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    protected from criminal acts and violent offenders. The Due Process Model focuses on the rights of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due process sometimes referred to as the due process clause. The clause “Prohibits state and local governments from depriving persons of life, liberty, or property without certain steps being taken to ensure fairness.” (ILL 2012) Due process demands that the justice system considers the facts of the case. Law agent’s primary focus is from the beginning of the arrest, filing, questioning, and handling the case to ensure fundamentals of fairness under the law. Due process model stretches back to early 1200 century to protect defendant’s rights. “Thomas Jefferson set forth the rationale for the establishment of government in a society: to secure the fundamental, inherent, and preexisting rights of the people.”…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, there are two main competing models of justice, the Due Process Model, and the Crime Control Method. The Due Process Model (DPM) is known as obstacle course justice with an ideology that relies on the formal structure of the law and legal guilt. The DPM’s primary goals are to protect the due process rights of the accused and limiting the powers of the state. It runs completely with an underlying assumption of innocence, making it not so effective at all times. The Crime Control Method (CCM), on the other hand is known as assembly line justice. It has an ideology that centers on efficiency and effectiveness of the system and factual guilt. The CCM’s primary goals are to protect society from crime and to control the behavior of the community. This process uses and informal fact finding process through the police and prosecutors. Also contrary to the DPM the CCM operates under a presumption of guilt. The CCM of justice is focused on detaining the accused and securing convictions, making it very effective in preventing crime however somehow you have to step on some toes. These two models and methods occur all the time in the criminal justice system we see today, and there is much controversy behind which process should dominate. In 1984 Sherman and Berk published their overall case study on “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault”. This study supported a more CCM ideology of justice. However in 1988 Binder and Meeker published an article critiquing the methods and conclusions of the original study, offering a counterpoint.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideals within the Due Process model are based upon repression of crime but it also points out that the police are not always correct in their fact finding. The due process model is more realistic leaving room for error. It recognizes that not every system is perfect and so it does not assume that the alleged criminal is guilty before the case is proven and clearly doesn’t want to run the risk of imprisoning an innocent person.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two models of crime that have been opposing each other for years are the due process model and the crime control model. The due process model is the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. Any person that is charged with a crime is required to have their rights protected by the criminal justice system under the due process model. The crime control model for law enforcement is based on the assumption of absolute reliability of police fact-finding, treats arrestees as if they are already found guilty. This paper will compare and contrast the role that the due process and crime control models have on shaping criminal procedure policy.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rehabilitation is another punishment philosophy. In this philosophy, people that are found guilty of committing crimes might need to have a change in behavior to prevent a person from committing future crimes. Under this philosophy people who commit…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Child interviewing techniques derived from transcripts of the McMartin Preschool case were found to be substantially more effective than simple suggestive questions at inducing preschool children to make false allegations against a classroom visitor. Thirty-six children interviewed with McMartin techniques made 58% accusations, compared with 17% for 30 children interviewed with suggestive questions. Social influence and reinforcement appeared to be more powerful determinants of children's answers than simple suggestive questions. The SIRR model is proposed to explain how false statements may be elicited from children or adults. Categories identified in the SIRR model are suggestive questions, social influence, reinforcement, and removal from direct experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]…

    • 2090 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kholbergs Stages

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The concept of justice has three components- interpersonal adjudication, law based on fault and an emphasis on procedures. Interpersonal adjudication is based upon the rights and duties of the individual person. The law based on fault on concept is a liberal concept of justice that a person should not be disadvantaged or punished except for fault. The due process concept is the emphasis on procedures. The liberal does not believe in the possibility of achieving equality, democracy, justice, and the public good and other ideals through legislative and prescriptive action.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice and Injustice

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    society, which is inevitable. There is no way to stop injustice from happening and there is no…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Within this essay, the Theory of Justice will be broke down. It will lay out some personal information on John Rawls. It will give the principles of the theory and explain what they mean. It will also explain how the principles of these theories differ from traditional utilitarianism. Lastly it will show how justice is defined by modern criminal justice agencies and other entities involved in the criminal justice system and how it differs from security.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to our reading there are two models to today’s Justice System, the Consensus model, and the Conflict model. The Consensus Model of Criminal Justice is “a criminal justice perspective that assumes that the systems’ components work together harmoniously to achieve the social product we call justice.” The other model,the Conflict Model, is “a criminal justice perspective that assumes that the system’s components function primarily to serve their own interests. According to this theoretical framework, justice is more a product of conflicts among agencies within the system than it is the result of cooperation among component agencies.” Both of these models or beliefs, are evident in everyday of our society, whether found by watching the evening news, or spending the day in the courtroom…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Achieving Justice

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I suffer from many nightmares and have done so for many years. Strangely, I didn't have them during the 15 years I in spent in prison after being wrongly convicted, with three others, for the 1975 Guildford and Woolwich pub bombings. It was almost as if I was in the eye of the storm while I was inside, and everything was being held back for a replay later in my life. Our case is well known now as one of first major miscarriages of justice. I am often contacted by people who, like me, spent many years on death row after being wrongly convicted. People ask whether a case like ours could happen today. Of course it could. I know of many innocent people still behind bars and I know there are echoes of what happened to us in cases that are still coming to light today. We were tortured – guns held to our heads. The case against us was circumstantial. We tried to get people to listen to what had happened to us, and it took years before our voices were heard outside.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The theory of justice is a work of political philosophy and ethics by John Rawls. According to Gomez, philosopher John Rawls who lived between 1921- 2002, argued the notion of social justice as fairness in his book "A Theory of Justice." He used foundations of utilitarian and Kantian philosophy to create a possible technique to estimate the ethics of social and political institutions. The principles of justice theories was Rawls 's theory and it is dependent on two important and central principles of social justice that, according to Rawls, assures a just and morally acceptable society. The first principle of social justice states “every person has a right to the most basic liberties, same as any other person who has a right to the same liberties.” The second principle of social justice states “all people should have access to the same social and economic positions and be able to take advantage of them”.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays