Single Payer System Analysis

While the last set of articles focused on the present and the case affecting the people’s lives immediately these articles focus more on the future impact of the case. They use empathetic evoking words to persuade their readers that because of this case many people’s future lives could be in danger of changing just like the lives of the women affected by this case. They also have rhetorical questions that leads the reader to a single conclusion that makes it so they must agree with their point of view. In addition to words such as “dismayed” they also continuous use the pronouns “us” and “we” (Diament) to show a connection between the audience and the author. This invokes empathy because not only are heavy words such as dismayed are used but
By having this line, it almost slightly demonizes the opposing side by showing that they are not above using words such as slut to describe a woman. After making their opposition seem like terrible human beings the articles also leads the reader to a conclusion that seems reasonable after the details given. The article writes “why not simplify things and implement a single payer system” (Diament)? A single payer system is basically universal healthcare provided by the government. This is a very left-wing idea and the reason that a system like this has not been implemented is because of right-winged induvial. This further adds to the idea that the opposition is ‘evil’ because they don’t not support healthcare. This also goes back to the supreme court case since it would be a wrong decision since they just supported the opposing side since it was against this idea of healthcare for all. These all lead to the idea the case was not about religion it is what every issue boils down to it was about money. Whether it because of the fines that they would have to pay or the tax increase they would have to endure to pay for the healthcare money they cared more for money than for religious