Preview

Similarities Between The Renaissance And The Enlightenment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
655 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between The Renaissance And The Enlightenment
The transformation from the medieval world into the early modern world can be best represented through the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, both of which were major recurring themes and had influence on numerous events that occurred throughout the early modern period.
The Renaissance was a cultural movement that originally began in Italy in the end of the medieval period and later spread throughout northwestern Europe, marking the beginning of the early modern period (PWH, p. 496). As such, the Renaissance can be seen as a bridge between the medieval and early modern periods. The Renaissance promoted the ideas of humanism and individualism, which involves being more interested in scientific explanations using rational thoughts rather than
…show more content…
This form of absolutism eventually led to the American Revolution, the first of many revolutions which tried to abolish an absolute monarchy in the early modern period.
Furthermore, In “The Social Order and Absolute Monarchy,” written by enlightenment thinker, Jean Domat, Domat tries to justify the absolutism portrayed by King Louis XIV by arguing that absolutism was created in the best interest of France and that obeying the king is like obeying God, from who the king stems all of his power. In contrast to Domat, John Locke, author of the Second Treatise of Government was completely against absolutism and believed that no person has to right to be “subjected to the political power of another without his own consent” (Locke, p.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    DBQ on Absolutism

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European monarchs in the seventeenth and eighteenth century viewed themselves as absolute rulers, or kings and queens that believed that they controlled everything within their state's borders. The people that were ruled by the absolute rulers believed absolutism had a different aspect than was being used by the kings and queens. This practice is known as absolutism. The people that were being ruled and the ruler or absolute monarch viewed the role of the absolute ruler differently.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period of European history referred to as the Renaissance was a time of great social and cultural change in Europe. It spanned from the sixteenth to the seventeenth century, and was regarded as the rebirth of antiquity. It was a time in which learning was transformed, and became an age of daring experimentation.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance was a period of great cultural and technological changes which swept Europe from the end of the 13th century. It was integral in developing Europe was subjected to different changes there were two primary renaissance which were most notable. They were the Italian and the Northern renaissance. Both of the renaissance had a profound impact on Europe. But they also had some typical differences among them and each was unique in its own way. Early in the 14th Century, Italian scholars started to study the ancient cultures that preceded them, like those of Greece and the Roman Empire. This scholarly interest would lead to the Italian Renaissance. Italy and Europe was ready for change after the harrowing destruction of the Black Plague in the Middle Ages. Florence, Italy, was the home of the start of the Renaissance. After the collapse of the Roman Empire, culture, politics, and the arts had only been in decline. Petrarch advocated learning about Italy's Latin and Roman history. The Pope and the royalty liked this idea, so other scholars begun to study in the same vein. These…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in England because Louis XIV had powerful standing armies. Louis came to a decision to chaos and anarchy was absolute power. Absolute monarchs created standing armies recruited, paid, and trained by the state. The…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many rulers used absolutism in their countries. They believed rulers should have complete control over the country. Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be feared and thought that the only way people would listen to him was if he was mean and scary. He thought if he was nice and loved then they would not fear him and end up taking advantage of him. (doc1) King James also believed absolutism was the way to go. He believed in divine right and that it was the only way to keep the country in order. He thought that kings were like gods and had the power to create or destroy anything that they thought was ineffective.(doc 2) Another person who believed in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He believed that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He said that to escape the brutish life people entered into a social contract which was an agreement by which they gave up the state of nature for an organized society. He also supported the Stuart kings in their struggle against parliament.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism DBQ

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two main forms of government. The two main forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these types of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism was the most effective type of government during that time period. Absolutism is when the ruler has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people of their nation. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them instead of a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In England, the move was away from an absolute monarch, and toward a more powerful Parliament. In France, the opposite was happening as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls all aspects of government with no checks or balances, had been introduced in England by James I and Charles I, but never quite took hold. In France, on the other hand, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God (the "divine right of Kings") and dissolving France's only general assembly. Absolutism failed in England but flourished in France is due mainly to the political situation in each country when the idea was first introduced.…

    • 751 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Louis XIV believed in absolutism. He once stated “The head alone has the right to deliberate and decide, and the functions of all the other members consist only in carrying out the…

    • 967 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there were two forms of government in Europe: absolutism, which gave unlimited power to the monarchs, and democracy, which gave power to the people. Which was more effective for this time period? Well, while both absolutism and democracy had their strengths and weaknesses, absolutism was more effective during this time. Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, King Louis XIV of France, and King James I of England all believed absolutism to be most effective.…

    • 739 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance and Enlightenment had both been time encouraging the idea of knowledge. They also had many differences like their main focuses and their views of women. Though they had many similarities and differences both had made huge impacts on the lives of the…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 Absolutism

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries absolutism was a more effective type of government than democracy. Absolutism was a form of government in which all of the power is in the hands of one ruler. Whereas, democracy is when the majority of the power is vested in the people. Absolutism occurred before the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; therefore it had an example to be or not to be modeled after. Even though most forms of absolutistic governments shared the same thought, they differed in the ways that they were ruled. Democracy was also a form of government during this time but it was not as successful.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two forms of government that were used during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were democracy and absolutism. Though both of these forms of governments were effective in there own ways, absolutism was more effective. Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, felt that the best way to rule was to be feared. He wrote in his book The Prince, Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it (Document 1). King James I also believed that absolutism was the way to rule. He thought that kings were like Gods therefore he believed in divine right. Divine Right is the belief that kings get their authority from God. "The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). Another person that ruled in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He felt that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance, Scientific Revolution, and Enlightenment were all vital times that greatly affected the word from about 1350 CE to 1700 CE. The aforementioned movements were all different from one another, and each sparked new concepts, such as humanism. It also led to the rise of new thinkers, whose ideas changed the course of history. Distinguishing the Renaissance, Scientific Revolution, and the Enlightenment can start at the very basics; they all took place during different time periods. However, under further examination each of the movements had to deal with different aspects of human life.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a rule using suppression, backed up by the claim to divine authority, an absolute monarchy embodies the omnipotent government reign. Such power was given solely to the head of the state without any constituted restraints. During the Reformation up to the seventeenth century, Europe’s social system started to have conflict as to whether absolute power should be appointed to the king. The king’s subjects, mostly nobles, supported their kings right to absolute power because they got the benefit of political leadership roles and were also given royal protection. The common-folk and the servants were against it because absolutism abused the power in ruling over the peasants as the king, which tended to be restricting.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays