Preview

Similarities Between China And India

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
555 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between China And India
In 1000 BCE to 600 BCE, China and India developed similar and different characteristics. China’s political structure was more rigid, reflected by their belief systems, while India’s loose governing relied on Hinduism to bring unity. Both China and India shared similar social developments in the deepening of a patriarchal system which belief systems worsened the conditions of women’s rights. China and India’s had different political structure because China’s rigid government rule was justified by Legalism and Confucianism, while India was divided by regions and their unifying force was Hinduism. Though the during the Maurya rule, Ashoka brought stability to India by governing bureaucratically, the majority of India during its civilization was divided and loosely governed regionally. The Guptas governed loosely because they relied on local rulers to maintain regional control. Since Hinduism had no specific originator it was able to bland many ideas from different regions, and the caste system divided the people and gave the structure that the government did not have to. India was mainly loosely governed and the multiple regions were unified by Hinduism, so the structure that Hinduism gave replaced a rigid political system. Whereas China had a rigid political structure reflected in their belief systems. Legalism was …show more content…
Both civilization’s belief systems contributed to different governing. China’s rigid system is reflected by Legalism strict laws and Confucianism organization of the government, while India was regionally governed. This loose system helped Hinduism become widespread and unite India because of Hinduism’s acceptance of many beliefs. They developed similar social aspects of their deepening of the women’s role in the patriarchy, their belief systems justified the subservient roles of women which the effects are still lasting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did China and India have similar interests? Did they share common likes or dislikes? Yes they did. in fact they had several things in common so many they were like sisters or brothers. Although the two were similar they still had there differences and at some points in time one country didn't like what the other was doing and decided to go kick em in the teeth and straiten em out. Here are just a few ways the two countries are similar and non similar.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mauryan/Gupta India from 320 B.C.E. to 550 C.E. had similar as well as different methods of political control with that of Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 C.E. in the sense that both used culture to justify social inequality supported with the idea of rising in social status and the use of religion to help with political control. The differences were more seen by the twos’ organization in political control as well as the language role in the midst of the civilizations.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political structure of both Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India were distinct because Han China focused…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these cultures needed to keep order and stability within their borders to maintain a prosperous society. Han China and Gupta India both implemented a tight social class…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome’s political method is centered around polytheism. Han China’s political method is centered around Confucianism during the beginning of the dynasty, and then around Daoism after political changes were made. . Confucianism is defined as more of a philosophy than a religion. Confucius taught philosophical and ethical ideas, that shaped the traditional Chinese culture. Han China, after change in authority, transformed from Confucianism to Daoism. Imperial Rome was centered around polytheism, the worship of many Gods. It is very different than Daoism. Daoism is based upon philosophy and nature, but polytheism is based upon gods. Han China and Imperial Rome express different political methods of control through religion. Imperial Rome and Han China had different ways in which their leaders were chosen. In Han China, rule was gained through ancestors into a centralized bureaucratic authority. In Imperial Rome authority began through certain elements of democracy, not through ancestral…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Asia Theme 5 CCOT

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The region of South Asia underwent many changes and continuities that resulted in a heavily patriarchal and hierarchal social structure by 600 CE. Perhaps the biggest change in the society was the caste system brought about by Aryans from Europe. The invaders helped to develop the different statuses going from priests, to warriors, to merchants, to commoners, and the natives or untouchables at the bottom. Once people were born into their designated caste, it was basically impossible to stray from it. These different subdivisions were a result of commerce and religion. As trading became more vital, merchant and craftsmen classes grew and pushed their way onto the social scale below the warriors. Hinduism, also derived from the Aryan invaders, provided the highest social standing referred to as Brahmins or priests. The caste system grew to be more important to the people than the government's authority as it provided a strong political and social stability. The second largest faith practiced in India next to Hinduism was Buddhism. The religion grew in popularity due to its message of equality to men and women alike from all levels of society. This affected the gender roles as well as social structure although the overall patriarchy and hierarchy firmly remained. From the beginning of this era, women were viewed as inferior and little is done to change this idea through 600 CE. These women were not even entitled to own property, and the superiority of men is also shown through the emperors many wives. This is demonstrated further in the family structures of South Asia as they are always headed by the men, both young and old. Marriages were often arranged while the girls were at very young ages in order to ensure adequate dowry. Women were responsible for the nurturing of children, performance of petty chores, and any other tasks assigned by the husbands, fathers, and sons of the family. The men, on the other hand, were educated and not at all…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Ancient times, China and India both had their own set of beliefs; Han Wudi excerised Confucianism in China and Ashoka promoted Buddhism in India but Han Wudi was not a lover of Confucian where Ashoka himself practiced Buddhism. However both ruled with a centralized bureaucracy and policed the provinces to maintain order and policies. And lastly, neither had strict policies constricting their people nor did they have much of a justified social structure.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | As the dynasties changed, so did the syle of leadership. For example, Qin stressed central authority wgereas the Han expanded the powers od the bureaucracy…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical China and India had differences in territorial governing as well as religious freedom, but compared with how they expanded their territory. China's main focus was political and army related, while India specifically focused on their primary religions. Both civilizations differed with how they ruled and lived, but they both experienced their own set of political…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Qin and Han dynasties of Classical China developed a kind of government called bureaucracy. The Qin stressed central authority, while the Hans expanded the powers of bureaucracy. In addition, Legalism was developed. India’s political features involved regionalism and diversity in political forms, unlike China’s bureaucracy. It is the reason why the Guptas did not require…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hinduism and Buddhism differed in the societal impact of caste implementation; the Hindus strongly forced this stratified class system while the Buddhists discouraged it. This is one of the largest differences between these two religions and played a major role in the history of India. In India, before the life of Siddhartha Gautama (The Buddha), the caste system was a way of life. Its strict and rigid implementation into the daily lives of all changed the society through such varying social classes. The caste system divided people into very strict social classes, and relationships/intermarriage between castes was not allowed. This meant that the classes in India stayed the same, and moving up or down in caste was impossible. When Buddhism was introduced, the Buddha believed the caste system was not needed for enlightenment and as his followers accumulated, the impact of the caste system dimished, allowing for the eventual banning of it altogether. Both of these religions’ beliefs pertaining to caste regulation and social stratification forever changed the ideals of India and continue to today.…

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The political organization of Europe and China and of Europe and India had some similar and different aspects to their way of ruling and running their societies. They all underwent construction of states which led to expansion of their societies and later caused conflict. The effort at political organization in Europe and China and Europe and India was that they tried to become more ordered.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hierarchy of ancient China and India were similar with a noticeable sign of select individuals being considered “higher” then others. The caste system was strict in India and prohibited other classes from interacting with each other. China’s social system differed from India’s caste system, by not demonstrating a formal and strict social ladder. Where in India there existed over three hundred subcastes at one point, China had a simple three caste social ladder. Although the Chinese did not have as strong of a social ladder, there still existed “higher” people such as the bureaucrats. Bureaucrats and landowners were considered to be of a higher class then peasants, farmers, and merchants. Patriarchy was a very big factor in culture and social order in China and India. India’s strict caste system led to a more “flexible” and popular religion known as Hinduism. Many Indians preferred this religion over Buddhism, which the Chinese practiced, because the brahmans or priests strongly influenced the population. Brahmans and many other Indians did not like the idea of any being of any caste level achieving “peace” by their efforts, which Buddhism taught. The Chinese believed in Buddhism and reaching nirvana by finding peace within. A major difference between Indian and Chinese culture was that Indians lived to die and reincarnate to a better caste level and eventually reaching the gods, whereas the Chinese lived a good life with no rituals necessary to find nirvana. Although the Chinese and Indian culture was very different, both races strived and lived in balance to find their gift in the afterlife. A major difference between the Chinese and Indian culture was that…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is not as deeply rooted as it is in the Americas. America is a Gregorian Roman Cultural society that accepts all religion. China and India have European influence such as bollywood, sports, and entertainment but it is a communist, capitalistic, society. Some of women work in factors and business instead of sewing and cooking. China and India has its own since of culture and history. If cultural syncretism had taken root in India or China they would not have been able to keep their own tradition. They practice their own religion unlike the Americas whose religion comes from the European Roman influence. They are more respected as a culture since syncretism did not take place, which allows them to keep their own identity. The women still have respect for the men and they are not promoting a feminist movement like the Americas and Europeans. They were able to control and maximize their resource unlike the indigenous and Africans whose land was controlled and taken over. India and China is a dominant and respected power because they were not syncretism by the…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays