Preview

Similarities Between Carnegie And Muir

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Carnegie And Muir
Andrew Carnegie and John Muir both grew up in Scotland and soon after moved to the United States to seek a better life where resources were more plentiful. Carnegie and Muir both had a similarity for not only business, but invention as well. Carnegie and Muir both clearly had the ability to become successful businessmen and their inventions prompted both of their successes. Both of them always had ranging activities and were raring to learn new things. They both shared similar qualities and were very determined in what they did. Carnegie and Muir had a love and passion for writing. They both wrote short stories, articles, and books. Muir and Carnegie wanted to get their point across. They both became one of the most influential individuals …show more content…
He created a stronger type of steel that was not only the most effective, but the most efficient as well. Andrew Carnegie also had a strategy of his own. He believed that the only way to become a great businessman was to control monopolies and control the step of the process in materials. Carnegie definitely had a different side to him. He was a cruel businessman to his workers and a very kind philanthropist. He would poorly pay his workers, as well as leave them poorly housed. Carnegie was really never close to his workers and the wages that they had were very low compared to other steel industries. Nevertheless, he believed that "the man who dies rich, dies disgraced and a rich man should use his money for the benefit of others" (Youngs 33.) In Carnegies older years, he devoted himself entirely to his philanthropist's beliefs' after he sold his business. Carnegie built libraries around the world, but focused especially on the United States. He opened up galleries, museums, music halls, and technical schools. He also encouraged research and higher learning to others. Carnegie also established a donation to permanently seek an end to war. His donations totaled about 350 million

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie believed in applying survival of the fittest to business, while J.P. Morgan established a community of interest among the larger corporations. (M.A.P.A.H.) Although their beliefs were different, the end goal was the same, to essentially battle over the monopoly of steel. In 1890, Carnegie dominated the steel industry, this troubled Morgan, so he bought Carnegie out for $480 million. (M.A.P.A.H.) Morgan gathered together United States Steel, which was an amalgamation of 180 independent businesses. This business, US Steel, was capitalized at $1 billion dollars! Morgan demolished Carnegie’s steel company by owning or regulating 65 iron ore mines [ 1906, Lake Superior ], over 700 steel and iron works, 1,100 miles of railroad…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some things they had in common was that they were both leaders in the New world. A lot of people looked up to them and hoped to be like them. The way they liked to attract settlers were with documents. They would write in a persuasive way to encourage people to join them. While on their journeys they would write about their experiences. In their writing, they wrote…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1860 Dbq Analysis

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document 7 it states that “In 1882 the Carnegie Steel Company...inaugurated a policy whose object was to control all factors which contributed to the production of steel, from the ore and coal in the ground to the steel billet and the steel rail.” Andrew Carnegie’s company basically owned iron mines, steel mills, railroads, and shipping lines. Rockefeller used his profits to buy other oil companies and ended rivalry in the oil industry by forming the Standard Oil Trust. J.P. Morgan created a banking monopoly, Swift and Armour possessed meat packing, and Vanderbilt created a railroad…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, were both at one point in there life’s the richest men in the world. However they both had very different trails getting to their fortunes. Rockefeller was more or less handed money being part of the prestige aristocracy, however he was a very shred and organized man. He stressed the idea of planning ahead and never procrastinating, in most cases he was a penny-pinching millionaire. Even as a child he was always very organized and always planned ahead. This helped contribute to his success in his life with is Oil Company. Andrew Carnegie was not as fortunate as Rockefeller; he was an Irish Immigrant and at one point in his life was making a $1.70 a week. He was the epitome of the American dream; he rose…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “You cannot push anyone up a ladder unless he is willing to climb a little”. Andrew Carnegie was believed to be a captain of industries. Carnegie grew up to be the wealthiest business men in America. Andrew Carnegie is and always will be a captain of industry.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was a ‘hero’ in the sense that he gave away most of his money to establish many libraries, schools, and universities in America, the UK and other countries, as well as establish a pension fund for former employees.Carnegie felt that money is like manure, i.e., it does no good unless you spread it around. Aside from his well-known steel business that he sold to J.P. Morgan who formed US Steel, the philanthropic qualities of the man are most remembered. As Andrew Carnegie himself said on the subject of wealth: “Surplus wealth is a sacred trust which its possessor is bound to administer in his lifetime for the good of the community.”,“There is no class so pitiably wretched as that which possesses money and nothing else.”“I resolved to stop accumulating and begin the infinitely more serious and difficult task of wise distribution.”…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These facilities, however, don’t cure hunger or poverty. In another aspect, he has helped to hurt the race and in his quest for wealth, he impoverished many people in the process. He helped create the problem of poverty and made men unworthy of the use of “indiscriminate charity.” Carnegie did not speak of the corporate takeovers in his attempt and success of eliminating the competition by following the “Law of Competition” and the “Law of the Accumulation of Wealth.” Hard working men were out of work and unable to support their families and some men that did have jobs couldn’t support their families on the unfair wages he paid his employees. He decided and uniquely achieved the feat of giving away 90% of his fortune in his own lifetime, but only when he could dictate and shape the purposes for which the money was spent. Carnegie did not trust the people in which he meant to help. He felt a sort of guilt in his later years because of all the people he hurt along the way in order to become the world’s wealthiest man of the…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you were the richest person in the world what would you do with your money, save the economy from going under or simply just walk away. Well Andrew Carnegie was a man of wealth though he didn’t start out like that; he came from a poor family born in November, 1835, in the attic of the cottage his family lived in, in Dunfermline Scotland. He and his family left that cottage in Scotland to come to America in 1848 where at twelve years old he started to work almost immediately. Andrew Carnegie is a hero because his views on business, he is charitable, and he knew business. Everyone has their own views on how to run a business but Andrew Carnegie will forever be known as someone with great business practices. Carnegie believed in social Darwinism which means the product of natural selection of those persons best suited to existing living conditions and in accord with which a position of laissez-faire (means no government involvement) is advocated (doc.2).…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Carnegie Dbq

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie grew to be a powerful business man. He was self-made which means he started out with nothing then became successful on his own. Andrew was born in Scotland in the year of 1835 and grew up poor. He later started working as a bobbin boy but had little earnings at the age of 12. In 1872, he adopted the Bessemer Process and built a steel mill in Pittsburgh. As a result of his wealth, Carnegie gave away $350,695,653 which helped others. The philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie made him a known hero.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These men are Captains of Industry, because they have helped our society by donating lots of their money to different charities and organizations. For Carnegie, he has,“Donated more than $350 million to further public education, build over 2,500 libraries.” (Website) Now that people can get a better education, they can get a better job and then support their family. Plus, poor people can check out books and get a free education, because there are more libraries. That way, they can get a job, support their families, and not be as poor. Carnegie also, “Created the Carnegie Corporation of New York, endowing it with $125 million to support benefactions after his death.” This means that people can now have extra money to be given to organizations…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I was poor at the time of the Industrialization and had to work long hours for a little amount of money, I would take Carnegie as an unethical man. However, times have changed, and it would be wrong to say that his point of view was unethical. Andrew was a clever man. The fact that he was a self-taught man, poor and immigrant makes his views credible because he has been on both sides. Just like the coal miner aspires for being better in his job, Carnegie once did the same. Ethically speaking, Carnegie, as far as history has provided for us, never did something that would harm others. First, his view on the survival of the fittest is not unethical, is just his point of view, and at a certain point, it is true. Only the smartest ones survive or persevere. If everyone had the best traits for survival, then there would be no competition. Additionally, the idea that the poor now enjoy what the rich never had at a time is not unethical. It promotes the idea of comfort yourself with what you have because at a time those things were not within anyone’s reach. However, now these luxuries are available, and the people should aspire to have more. Another point to restate is to help those who help themselves, this is also ethical. He talks about a social responsibility to improve society which is no way a harm to anyone. To sum up, Carnegie’s views can be considered…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie is believed to be one of the most philanthropist person in history. Although he is said to have been quite wealthy and considered as the second richest man in the world, he dedicated most of his life to charity work. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie stressed on the importance of being philanthropic through recirculation of money in the society (Carnegie 2012). He stressed on the fact that, giving away money to charitable organizations is not all. However, he suggested that, the rich should be guaranteed that money and resources given reach the community that it was intended to and used for the right purpose.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie, the ambitious and skilled king of steel during the late 1800s, was the most famous man in business of his time. He certainly had his many flaws and as the most famous American of those days, his faults were highly talked about. Carnegie was not perfect and made his share of choices that many people saw as misdeeds, but that is like how everyone in the world is. Carnegie was a hero of his day because he showed the characteristics of being capable, responsible, and philanthropic.…

    • 689 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie History

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carnegie is most widely known for his monopolization of the steel industry. He developed numerous companies to support the need for steel in the developing United States. He foresaw that following the Civil War steel was going to be an important part of American life. He decided that it would be a smart idea to invest in the developing industry and that decision paid off enormously. (Amer. Exp.) He worked to modernize the United States through the building of bridges, railroads, and other vital roadways, which in turn brought the country together. By 1900, Carnegie Steel Juggernaut produced more steel, than all of Great Britain.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Andrew Carnegie

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie was a man with a strong outlook on how the wealthy should utilize their abundant amounts of cash. Although there were many other ways to dispose of the surplus of cash from the wealthy he favored mainly one. He believed that if the wealthy people in America would spend money through out their life on not only themselves but to also help the communities and charities, that they would become more respected through their life and also help America’s economy stay strong There were also a few different ways that people choose to pass on their money, one of which the wealthy would leave the surplus of money, once they deceased, to a loved one through a will. Carnegie’s outlook on this was not agreeable mainly because he believed that the person that would inherit the money would utilize it in the wrong ways and would not be grateful for what their loved one that left it to them did to gain it in the first place. Another way the wealthy would pass on their money would be to leave it to a charity after the passed away. Once again Carnegie did not agree to this method as well. He believed that it was a better way to pass on the surplus of cash, but not the best. He believed that the person that donated the money after they passed should have been donating the money all through out their life, and by not doing so makes it seem like he wanted to be buried with it. Carnegie believed his method of utilizing the wealth through out life was the better path, because not only would the rich man be helping the community through out their lives but also once they pass away. The rich man would also become very respected and popular while utilizing Carnegie’s method, and in the end very famous usually leading to some sort of…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays