Preview

shshshs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
326 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
shshshs
what are the different types of power sharing?Power sharing can take many forms in modern democracies. Infact there is not a single formula for sharing power but a broad range of political opinions to settle the disputes and differences among various sections of the society. The most common arrangements for power sharing in modern democracies are –
(i) Power is shared among different organs of the government, such as legislature, executive and judiciary. Such a separation ensures that none of the organs can exercise unlimited powers. As no particular organ enjoys unlimited powers in its area, it acts as in-built checks and balances in the system. This type of arrangement is also called horizontal distribution of power, since all the organs are at the same level of exercise different powers. e.g., power sharing in India.
(ii) Power is shared among governments at different levels i.e., general government for the entire country and various regional or state governments. Its aim is to reconcile national unity, interests and power with States’. rights and interests. This is called federal division of power and the divisions relating to higher and lower levels of the government are called vertical division of power, e.g., Indian constitution establishes a dual polity in which the powers are divided between the Centre, i.e., Union and the State governments.
(iii) Power is shared among different social groups which can be based on religious or linguistic lines, e.g., community government in Belgium, where all the major communities get power relating to their social matters.
(iv) Power is shared among various political parties. The multi-party system provides enough options for the voters to choose from and also keeps the ruling party under pressure so that they perform better. Sometimes several parties join together to prove their majority and thus, form a coalition government, e.g., the multi-party system in India where there are national and regional parties
Posted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    powers but the system makes sure that they all have the same power. The legislative is the…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has balanced power because of reserved powers, no benefits, and checks and balances.Both National and State Governments have reserved powers for them,this helps because only National Governments…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central government's powers include conducting foreign relations, providing an army and navy, and declaring war while the state government's powers include setting up local governments, holding elections, and establishing schools. The two governments’ shared power, includes being able to tax, borrow money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws (DOC A). As shown, the central government and state government has specific power divisions where the central government is responsible for matters that help the country while the state government is responsible for more local matters within each…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many power theories used in this world. State Autonomy has two clear opposition sides between the states. The states act in their own interest (Rules). This theory is presented in the United States…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Divisions among income and occupation; countless immigrants and races; over 72 religions with 65,000+ members; many regions with distinctive traditions and cultures = many interests and opinions…

    • 13464 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    us government

    • 2528 Words
    • 11 Pages

    There is no fixed principle on how power is to be shared among 3 branches or between states and federal government. Power shifts over time in response to what people perceive as necessary. It depends on the economy, national security situation, and other factors. Hamilton & Madison argue in the Federalist Papers that federalism is part of a system of checks and balances; people can shift their loyalties back and forth between state and national governments in order to keep each level under control. If rights are ignored or abused by one level, people can use the other to right what had been wronged (civil rights). Madison also argued that the US was ideal for power sharing and limited government, because the more factions, the more they will check each other, so no one faction or group can seize control of the government.…

    • 2528 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personal- those who hold power as a result of their occupation or role, such as teacher’s and employers.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress and the President

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Several factors can cause conflict in our system of separated institutions sharing power. Among them are constitutional ambiguities, different constituencies, varying terms of office, divided party control of the different branches, and fluctuating support of the president or Congress.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is known as the separation of powers. The constitution divides commonwealth powers between three separate bodies as it is necessary in any legal system, for the government to exercise the functions of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Each act as a check on the others, to ensure that there is no abuses of power and that constitutional authority is not exceeded. The aim of the separation of powers is to ensure that authority is evenly distributed between these three groups. The legislative function means that laws must be made, and the parliament is made up of representatives elected by the people. The administrative executive function consists of public service and cabinet. This power ensures that the laws are administered or executed. The judicial function is responsible for interpreting the law and when dispute arises. The court system, independent judges and magistrates exercise this power. The separation of powers is demonstrated in the case of the Australian communist party vs. the commonwealth of Australia in…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PESTLE Analysis of UK

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages

    ensures adequate distribution of power between the executive branch led by the prime minister, the bicameral legislature…

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several authors such as Hofstede, Shwarz and Trompenaars investigated the characteristics of power distribution in different societies, each with their own accents. Hofstede uses the criteria of power distance. It describes to what extend a countries population accepts that power in organisations and institutions is unquelly divided. In other words ; is the power distribution mainly based on vertical or horizontal relationships? (Nardon & Steers, 2006 ; Robins, Judge & Campbell, 2011)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In larger countries, those who are given these rights and powers are then looked at to represent and preside over the remaining population. This concept is similar to regular bodies of government around the world. People in this system are inclined to agree with decisions made by those given with authority knowing the inequality this may bring. The small power distance countries which are societies…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It depends on different circumstances such as political culture, religion, mentality, historical relations, and readiness to cooperate with each other. The author believes that proportional representation rules in divided societies is undoubtedly the optimal way to go democracy. He provides Denmark as an example of successful experience for African countries. This suggestion is criticized by some scholars. According to Horowitz (1985, 1991), “…that heterogeneous countries in Europe are not easily comparable with deeply divided African and Asian countries. Therefore, it will be difficult to adapt Western consociational democracy in these countries, because the hostility towards members of other groups is much more intense than in the European countries” (as cited in Binningsbo, 2013, p. 100). I support this scholar`s opinion, the reason is that, firstly, it is not acceptable to compare totally different countries. Secondly, in deeply divided ethnic countries power-sharing may lead to fight each other, majority clans can dominate over small clans. As Jarstad (2008: 106) argues: “Although power sharing is prescribed as a viable solution to terminating civil war, it also has a disturbing record of bringing instability, inefficient government and even more violence to war-torn societies” (as cited in Binningsbo, 2013, p. 101). On the other hand, it is clear that divided…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As with any other democracy, political parties represent different sections among the Indian society and regions, and their core values play a major role in the politics of India. Both the executive branch and the legislative branch of the government are run by the representatives of the political parties who have been elected through the elections. Through the electoral process, the people of India choose which representative and which political party should run the government. Through the elections any party may gain simple majority in the lower house. Coalitions are formed by the political parties, in case no single party gains a simple majority in the lower house. Unless a party or a coalition have a majority in the lower house, a government cannot be formed by that party or the coalition.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Power Sharing

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Finish Line & Beyond PO W E R SH A R I N G Power Sharing: Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy. A democratic rule involves sharing power with those affected by its exercise, and who have to live with its effects. All communities, social groups get their say in the governance. People have a right to be consulted on how they are to be governed. A legitimate government is one where citizens, through participation, acquire a stake in the system. Power Sharing in India: India is a democratic country. People of India elect their representative through direct franchise and representatives elect the government to make or amend rules & regulations and to carry out day to day functioning of governance. One basic principle of democracy is that people are the source of all political power. In a democracy, people rule themselves through institutions of self-governance. In a good democratic government, due respect is given to diverse groups and views that exist in a society. Everyone has a voice in the shaping of public policies. Therefore, it follows that in a democracy political Forms of power sharing power should be distributed among as many citizens as possible. Forms of Power Sharing: Power Sharing in Different Organs of Government: Power is shared among different organs of government, such as the legislature, executive and judiciary. Let us call this horizontal distribution of power because it allows different organs of government placed at the same level to exercise different powers. Such a separation ensures that none of the organs can exercise unlimited power. Each organ checks the others. This results in a balance of power among various institutions. For example, ministers and government officials exercise power, they are responsible to the Parliament or State Assemblies. Similarly, judges can check the functioning of executive or laws made by the legislatures. This arrangement is called a system of checks and balances. Power Sharing at Different Levels: Power…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays