Preview

Should The United States Invade Iraq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The United States Invade Iraq
Saddam Hussein was the leader of Iraq for over 30 years who made a “promising, oil-rich nation”(MacFarquhar) into a war-filled, police state. After growing up fatherless and in a poor village, he found violence to be a quick solution to his problems. In 2003 the United States invaded Iraq due to various threats and conflicts the two nations had run into. Was the United States justified in invading Iraq? Some might say that Iraq should deal with their own problems and not have another nation come to shut them down. Iraq’s problems were not kept within Iraqi borders, which is why they had become so great. The United States had many justified reasons to invade Iraq. Hussein was killing many people, including his own, he invaded various countries
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of War Waging In Iraq
    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of War Waging In Iraq

    The war waging in Iraq is the biggest argument in the United States today. There are two sides to this argument, as there is any every case. Either you are a supporter of the war, or you don’t support the war. Though you can’t be in the middle because this issue is far to important no to care about. In the spring of 2003, President George Bush declared war against Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. President Bush strongly believed that Saddam either had or was harboring weapons of mass destruction. He gave Saddam a forty-eight hour deadline to remove them. Saddam did nothing. In result, we invaded Iraq. It took only weeks for the most powerful army in the world to take over this weak country. Then the hunt for the weapons of mass destruction began. Come to find out, no weapons were found. Only a few rockets filled with nerve agents. Later on, Saddam was found hiding in a hole under a house outside a small village. Since then, the Americans have been trying to run this country. Although most of the Iraqi’s are glad we have taken out Saddam, there is a small half that is not, and has been making the rebuilding process very difficult. I am very much for the war and I hope to further solidify my…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Iraq War
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Iraq War

    The United States has been at war since its creation in 1776. It has battled confrontation 222 out of 239 years, just about 93% of its continuance. Notably, one of the most crucial wars is the “War on Terror”. Beginning in March of 2003, this war initially served the purpose of getting rid of the country’s leader Saddam Hussein to prevent his use of suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. While this war was strategically justified the real war between Iraq and the U.S. began long before what is officially recognized. The United States of America should not have invaded Iraq as it promoted the illegal exercise of government power and democracy, encouraged continuous genocide and violence, and empowered an extreme capitalist regime.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Truman Doctrine Failure
    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Truman Doctrine Failure

    However, in 1990, when Saddam Hussein of Iraq invaded neighboring Kuwait, President George Bush of the United States decided to take action. Iraq acquired a huge debt in her war against Iran, and the abundant oil supply in Kuwait was an attractive means of erasing this debt. With Iraq in control of a large amount of the World 's oil supply, the United States would be at Saddam Hussein 's mercy. In addition to the Kuwaiti oppression, the United States could not let this monopoly take place. President Bush commanded a prolonged series of bombings on Iraq which resulted in Hussein 's eventual withdrawal from Kuwait. This was not a war of containment, but it served a similar purpose in that it sought to prevent an aggressor from overtaking a weaker neighbor. Also, the United States fought for her oily supply, giving the war significant purpose in contrast to wide opinions concerning the Vietnam War (Schwartzkopf 55). Thus, the Gulf War received exponentially more praise and reestablished the validity of the Truman Doctrine (Schwartzkopf…

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Understand Bush's Foreign Policy Approach
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Understand Bush's Foreign Policy Approach

    On March 20th of 2003, the United States launched an attack on Iraq. Although the war had went fairly well for the United States in the beginning by the summer of 2003, with the rising death toll and the weapons of mass destruction still unfound, many began to question the intelligence that had supported the war (222). The Iraq…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion Of Iraq
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion Of Iraq

    “The reason we invaded Iraq was for reasons far more than weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant who waged many wars in the Middle East, supported and aided numerous Aab invasions of Israel, threatened to invade Saudi Arabia, overran Kuwait, and caused the UN to bring about sanctions against Iraq. Saddam was also known to have an extensive chemical weapons arsenal and has used several chemical weapons against his own people while suppressing many human…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just War Theory: The War In Iraq
    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Just War Theory: The War In Iraq

    Just cause: In my opinion, the United States had no right to go into Iraq based solely on a theory that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. According to the Just War Theory, war is permissible only to confront “a real and certain danger," to protect innocent life, to preserve conditions necessary for decent human existence and to secure basic human rights.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was The Vietnam War Justified Analysis
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was The Vietnam War Justified Analysis

    Was the Vietnam “War” justified? In 1965, 3,500 United States Marines put boots on the ground in South Vietnam. The Marines being the first United States battle ready troops on the field in a skirmish that had been brewing for years. The comnie government of North Vietnam supported by the Soviet Union and the Chinese was confined in a battle with South Vietnam reinforced with the US in a Cold War proxy fight. The U S had been offering help as well as consultants to the South ever since the beginning of the 50s, gradually intensifying actions to include bombing runs and ground missions. As Rob Richy explains in the video lesson this week, the Vietnam War cannot even be considered an actual war for the simple fact that there was not even a war…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Reasons For America's Invasion Of Iraq Dbq
    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Reasons For America's Invasion Of Iraq Dbq

    President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose.…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Should America Get Involved With ISIS S
    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should America Get Involved With ISIS S

    ‘’ISIS is known for killing millions of innocent people to turn them into Muslims. Or those who are standing in the way from their main goal – to create an Islamic State. ‘’(Wikipedia)…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    De-Baathification Of Iraq
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    De-Baathification Of Iraq

    Saddam Hussein was a member of the Baathist Party so in order to remove his presents in the country’s infrastructure the United States removed all Baathist affiliates from their positions. While on the surface this seemed like a good idea, there were crucial details that were not taken into account. Details such as: the importance of the workers affiliated with the Baathists, and the reasons why workers associated themselves with the Baathist party. After the De-Baathification of Iraq many very important shoes were left unfilled, so the military replaced them with their own. “Now you have an American Soldier, who majored in Art History running the power grids, or someone else who is highly unqualified.” As these issues came to light the U.S. started letting these qualified Iraqi Citizens return to their jobs. New information exposed another oversight within this decision: The United States did not take into account that many Iraqi citizens joined the Baathist party out of necessity. Similar to Nazi Germany people affiliated with the Baathist party in order to get promoted and develop their career and not necessarily out of principal. While it was necessary to remove Saddam’s followers it should not have been at the cost of the country. In order to avoid this set back, the U.S. should have done more research on the party and the country’s infrastructure so that they could have made the transition smoother and prevented the removal of employees that were key components to the Iraqi…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Decision to Invade Iraq
    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Decision to Invade Iraq

    Our decision to invade Iraq was just. How the idea was sold to the American public was not, this in my opinion was the administrations greatest fault. There is no doubt that Iraq posed a significant threat to our nation and others and that its leader needed to be ousted. Whether the preemptive decision to invade was based on the belief that they possessed WMD is, in my opinion, inconsequential. Ethically, we know that utilitarians would evaluate the…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Should The United States Attack Iraq?
    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Should The United States Attack Iraq?

    The United States is known as one of the most powerful countries in the world, which can be something great for the nation but, it can also be the worst enemy for another country. With the power that the United States have, there can happen many things that are going to affect negatively to other countries. That was clearly demonstrated when the United States leaders decided to invade Iraq in 2003, Leader of the nation such as George W. Bush who was the President that time, he argued that there were many reasons why the U.S should attack Iraq. Some of those are; Iraq was was a threat for the national safety of the United States and other countries; also, Iraqis being overpressed by Saddam which makes their system non-democratic. The administration…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should the United States stay out of all foreign affairs?
    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should the United States stay out of all foreign affairs?

    The United States seems to have deemed themselves as the "Peace Keepers" of the world. Somewhere down the line of history, they have decided that there is a need to regulate any serious issues that are occurring outside of the country itself. Daryl Press defines Isolationism as, "Isolation avoids economic and diplomatic engagement and eschews potential profits from the global economy and the enrichment that sharing ideas and cultures can offer." Basically he is saying that the phrase foreign affair isn't specifically limited to wars. The term also includes financial aid, helping feed, clothe, and house third world countries in need.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Should The United States Empower The Afghan War?
    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should The United States Empower The Afghan War?

    The United States should empower the Afghan Government to actively pursue peace negotiations with the Taliban because total victory is neither plausible nor affordable. U.S. and NATO have battled the Taliban for sixteen years. Some defense analysts estimate the Afghan war cost the U.S. between $4 to $6 trillion dollars. Furthermore, thousands of Americans sacrificed their lives and limbs in pursuit of victory against the Taliban. Yet, the Taliban insurgency remains resilient today. The U.S. military strategy is unsuccessful and will not work as long as Pakistan harbors the Afghan Taliban and there’s a corrupt unsustainable Afghan government. Therefore, the U.S. should place more emphasize and prioritization on diplomatic and economic actions to establish a peace agreement with…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Inhumane Anthropology
    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Inhumane Anthropology

    The Bush administration had sent US troops to Iraq because there was a belief that the country had been developing weapons of mass destruction and were an aid to Al-Qaeda. Furthermore, a portion of America had supported this possible war as “44 percent of Americans reported [in a poll] that either ‘most or ‘some of the Sept.11 hijackers were Iraqi citizens. The answer is zero”( The Christian Science Monitor, March 14,2003). Moreover, America wanting to hurt Iraq was seen as a victim mentality act by others. On claimed that “We [Americans] do those who lost their lives no service at all by adopting a victim mentality”(An attack on Us All: NATO’s Response to Terrorism). This indicates that America had dwelled so much in this tragedy that their grievance became anger and that led into violence. Instead America should not thier anger interfere but rather “think about a rational response that brings real peace and justice to [the] world” (Zinn & Arnove, eds. (2009). Voices of a People’s History, 2nd edition (NY: Seven Stories Press), p. 603.). America invading Iraq was seen injustice since their involvement in the 9/11 attack was more of an assumption then factual…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics