Preview

Reasons For America's Invasion Of Iraq Dbq

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2121 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Reasons For America's Invasion Of Iraq Dbq
President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose. …show more content…
However, Source D states a report made in 2006 found that Bush’s government had “misstated, overstated, and manipulated intelligence with regards to linkages between Iraq and Al Qaeda; the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iraq” proving Iraq did not have possession of as many Weapons of Mass Destruction as stated by Bush. President Bush’s justification has been proven wrong, as his prime motive behind invading Iraq was not the fact that Iraq was in possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction – in fact, Iraq had no weapons that could harm America or possibly be seen as a threat to America. Source E is a political cartoon that shows America using large binoculars to look into Iraq, and before the invasion locating Weapons of Mass Destruction. However, after the invasion and demolishment of Iraq the same America has to use smaller binoculars to look at a destroyed Iraq and find no Weapons of Mass destruction. Source E suggests that the United States’ claim of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq were ultimately false, as after the invasion, they were asked about these weapons by the media and the U.N., and they could not find any evidence of the threatening and harmful weapons. America was not able to show the world the weapons that were a threat to America, as considered by Bush’s Administration. The absence of the supposedly threatening weapons, prove that President Bush had not delivered the whole truth to the media, and had manipulated and misstated information to invade Iraq with the support of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes, he vowed to get the ones who did 9/11 only to go after the ones who didn’t. He started a war simply out of greed. He even lied that there were weapons of mass destruction to start that war. So, your only basis for saying he is the strongest is because he started an unnecessary war and very well may be the reason why ISIS as well as other extremist exist and despise the United States.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Former President George Bush used a lot of historical fact to justify his argument of invading Iraq. He said things such as: Iraq’s technological abilities, their weapons of mass destruction, and Saddam Hussein’s previous threats against the US. He sounds like he has significant evidence to back up his speech, until he said “Many people have asked how close Saddam Hussein is to developing a nuclear weapon. Well, we don’t know exactly…” This statement only disapproved his previous statements.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war waging in Iraq is the biggest argument in the United States today. There are two sides to this argument, as there is any every case. Either you are a supporter of the war, or you don’t support the war. Though you can’t be in the middle because this issue is far to important no to care about. In the spring of 2003, President George Bush declared war against Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. President Bush strongly believed that Saddam either had or was harboring weapons of mass destruction. He gave Saddam a forty-eight hour deadline to remove them. Saddam did nothing. In result, we invaded Iraq. It took only weeks for the most powerful army in the world to take over this weak country. Then the hunt for the weapons of mass destruction began. Come to find out, no weapons were found. Only a few rockets filled with nerve agents. Later on, Saddam was found hiding in a hole under a house outside a small village. Since then, the Americans have been trying to run this country. Although most of the Iraqi’s are glad we have taken out Saddam, there is a small half that is not, and has been making the rebuilding process very difficult. I am very much for the war and I hope to further solidify my…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Foreign Policy

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is common today that the United States foreign policy has been inspiring to a lot of nations worldwide. It is argued by a lot of political scholars that the 9/11 terrorist attack actually shaped the United States foreign policy. Even though it is debatable to if the 9/11 attack did shape the United States foreign policy and how it did that can be discovered at the end of this essay. This will be proven by analysing a theoretical view of terrorism and a little background of what happened in September 11, 2001 and the United States foreign policy before the 9/11 attack followed by policies like the Bush doctrine, Obama doctrine and also looking at their criticisms.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president can use military power as he decides is essential and proper to shield national security and authorize all relevant United Nations Security chamber resolutions to use force. Before starting war, under obligations Bush had to make accessible to Congress his assurance of circumstances. Indeed, under requirements he had to prove that Iraq was infringing upon UN resolutions by yet being in control of weapons of mass destruction, and furthermore that Iraq was behind the 9-11 assaults. Invading Iraq started before any peaceful resolutions, an alliance between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and a threat of weapons of mass destruction was proven. In his book, Record emphasizes how the 9/11 Commission reported in 2005 that while there may have been contacts between al Qaeda and the Baathist administration, have seen no proof that these ever formed into a community relationship; nor have we seen confirmation showing that Iraq participated with al Qaeda in creating or completing assaults against the United States” (51). Furthermore, Hussein allowed UN auditors to have access to suspected weapons areas. They reported that there was no proof or conceivable sign of an atomic weapons program in Iraq. Record concludes, Iraq was a choice not because it was a convincing security threat but…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Billie

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Oweiss, Ibrahim M., (2007) “Why did the United States fail in its War on Iraq?”…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 20th of 2003, the United States launched an attack on Iraq. Although the war had went fairly well for the United States in the beginning by the summer of 2003, with the rising death toll and the weapons of mass destruction still unfound, many began to question the intelligence that had supported the war (222). The Iraq…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fahrenheit 451

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Matusek, Matt. “Purpose of Iraq war murky to Americans.” 17 September 2004. The Online Rocket. 1 April 2008.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the last decade, America has engaged in war in two middle-eastern countries. These countries are Afghanistan and Iraq. America has waged war against these countries for common reasons, but each war also had its unique cause for war. America had a just cause in its war in Afghanistan, but its participation in the war in Iraq is debated. Two presidents who had to lead and deal with these wars were President George Washington Bush who was in office from 2000 to 2008, and current President Barack Obama who came into office 2008 and is currently in office. Two administrations created by the following Presidents were the Bush administration and the Obama administration created by President George W. Bush and Barack Obama respectively. The legitimacy of these wars in these respective countries is on the minds of many Americans today.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The reason we invaded Iraq was for reasons far more than weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant who waged many wars in the Middle East, supported and aided numerous Aab invasions of Israel, threatened to invade Saudi Arabia, overran Kuwait, and caused the UN to bring about sanctions against Iraq. Saddam was also known to have an extensive chemical weapons arsenal and has used several chemical weapons against his own people while suppressing many human…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dixie Chicks

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Somehow over the course of the next year and a half, Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein became the target of President George W. Bush and administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. According to some reports, these officials made hundreds of false statements following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq and the myth of “weapons of mass destruction” in order to justify launching an attack of Iraq on March 20, 2003.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though Hussein was not directly linked to the terrorist attacks, Hussein was suspected of producing weapons of mass destruction, however, none were ever found. President George W. Bush’s The War on Terror. Now the confidence in believing the state regarding whatever it says, on terrorism, war, freedom of information, climate change, even when the governments are telling the truth. The effects of 9/11 politically, socially, economically and in virtually all spheres of life the US government wiretapping telephone calls of American citizens without a warrant to no-fly lists, Americans have witnessed the erosion of civil rights, and civil liberties have been eroded and our concern for individual rights, rounding up and deporting Muslim immigrants by the thousands when there was anything dubious about their status; including the claim that our president had the constitutional authority to imprison indefinitely, without trial, any person on the planet he deemed an “unlawful enemy combatant”. The United States is still involved in the Middle East to this day. The changes from 9/11 continue to have effects across the globe, particularly in the Middle East, where American-led military operations helped foment rebellions and ongoing warfare throughout the…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision to Invade Iraq

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To insist that any civilized nation attempt to combat irrational, hostile nations or terrorist organizations by following international law is itself irrational. The UN and international law in general need to be able to adjust to face unique threats. Fighting an enemy that does not adhere to rules of warfare or international law while “playing by the rules” is a recipe for disaster. A simple example of this is the use of uniforms. The Geneva Conventions provided that lawful combatants must wear a distinguishable uniform. In Iraq and Afghanistan the enemy wore no uniforms while American soldiers are required to wear them. How does a soldier identify the enemy if he wears no uniform? There is little argument that our enemies in Iraq and Afghanistan were not following international law. The argument then turns to how we deal with nations and organizations like these.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Journal Evaluation

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The article I choose was Why Most Rational People Must Disapprove of the Invasion of Iraq. This article relates to the golden rule theory and talks about how the U.S. was in the wrong for invading Iraq when they did. It also talks about the just war theory where it is said that you are justified to act upon war if a country or allies has suffered military attack or is about to suffer a military attack. The U.S. was not in an immediate threat from Iraq so we had no reason to send troops in we can argue that there were Weapons of Mass Destruction. However, as the article says that them having WMDs has been refuted by the best evidence. So then we talk about the golden rule, when using the golden rule we are saying that the US attacking another country that did nothing to them. Then you could say it is okay for another country attacking the U.S. for no particular reason. The article says that if you would have thought it to be morally permissible for the US to preventatively attack a country then it would be ok for another country to attack the U.S.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethnic Conflict In Iraq

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Upon marching into Iraq in 2003, American forces were tasked with deposing Saddam Hussein and imposing stability and security. The former was accomplished with stunning rapidity; the latter continues to elude Iraqis, regional interests, and the Western world almost fifteen years later. Why such chaos? Even the American “surge” of soldiers in 2007 did little to quell the violence. Ethnic conflict between the Kurds, Sunnis, and Shias, extant prior to American involvement, intensified post-invasion.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays