Preview

Should The NHS Be Privatized

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The NHS Be Privatized
Should the NHS be Privatized?
The NHS has been a free health service since 1948. This service is free to anyone who is a 63.2 million people. Taking that opportunity away will have detrimental effects of the overall health of our nation.
1.7m. The NHS currently employs 1.7m people. Some will say that these employees are underpaid, (which is true). However, if the privatisation process occurs then hundreds of thousands of jobs could be cut to avoid unnecessary expenditure. So my question to you is; what do you think is more important? Lives or money?
The NHS was conceptualized as a service that would provide health care for all, disregarding social status or wealth. Yet where would privatization take us then? Agreed, the government would make more money, however those who cannot afford the new expensive health care are forced to live a life of illnesses and premature death.
Making our health care expensive is only going to take out nation spiralling down into a state of decay and disaster. Without the advice of a medical professional people are going to turn to the internet for advice. There will be cases of people overdosing on concoctions of drugs they found cheap online as they knew no better. As well as this, the overpricing of simple health care will lead to a dramatic increase in the crime rate across the country. How would you feel if you had to rob a shop just to find out if you’ve broken your toe?
You may say I’m over exaggerating when I maintain that the mental state of the nation would decrease. But you’d be wrong. If someone in your family is ill it will have a contagion effect within your family. Now imagine this situation where you are unable to pay to get this person simple treatment.
Privatisation will allow the everyday business man to invest in the company. This means that there will be a boost to the current economy. As well as this it will give the general public an interest in the running of the business. Nevertheless could you not see this as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss the current level of national healthcare expenditures and to determine if we as Americans are spending too much on healthcare. The author of this paper will provide examples and solutions where we as a nation should add or cut from the healthcare expenditures. This paper will also detail how the general public's healthcare needs are being paid for, the biggest economic healthcare challenge, why the challenge should be addressed, and how this challenge to be financed.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The purpose of the NHS is to provide free health care for residents In the UK.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Comprehensive, universal and free, from cradle to grave’ was the mission statement of the National Health Services, United Kingdom, when it was established in 1948. However, the cost of healthcare provision has risen to such an extent that many believe it is unsustainable (NHS, 2013). The NHS is highly labour intensive, employing 1.3 million people. According to NHS guide, in 2011 annual spending on the NHS was £123 billion which was approximately 20% of all government spending. Since a large part of healthcare is provided free of cost, demand is expanding to its maximum with failure to take steps to avoid the risks that the healthcare insures against.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the past 5 years we have heard a great deal of rhetoric regarding socialism and healthcare as a result of the passing of the Affordable Care Act, particularly in how ACA compares to socialized medicine in England and the UK. The concerns of the people regarding socialism are important as our country is founded on capitalist principals, and to change those principals requires a complete shift in our thinking. A close look at the systems in question reveals important aspects for consideration; indeed it is important to be aware of the potential future of the ACA. While the English National Healthcare System and the Affordable Care Act have similarities, funding and administrative differences mean that while the ACA could become socialized, it does not currently fit that label.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meaning of Privatization has been widely debated as the years progressed, however one idea scholastics and experts appear to concede to is; privatization is a relationship between a private- sector organization and an administration office with the end goal of finishing a venture that will benefit the pubic. Privatization relationships are the upfront of ideological, political and economic debates, they continue to be used as political tools to solve problems associated with increased demand for public services growing concerns with the size of government, and decreased opportunities for additional resources (MaNamara, Morris 2008). No one public private partnership is the same, each utilizing different arrangements and public management…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beforehand, only less than half the population were covered by existing health insurance set by the Liberals in 1911. Those who were not covered still had to pay for a doctor at a great expense. In addition, hospitals still relied on voluntary efforts and therefore suffered as a result – these reforms were successful as they completely revolutionised this old system. The NHS Act was passed in 1946 but came into practise by 1948. It offered a full range of help; free treatment from GPs, specialists, free hospital treatments, free eye and dental treatments, spectacles and hearing facilities – this would have greatly increased the overall health of the nation which boosts its success as a reform. However, on the other hand it is important to remember that this health care reform was of an enormous expense, to the point that National Insurance funds did not cover it. This therefore meant that they had to backtrack on “free for all” and even had to place charges on prescriptions, spectacles and dental treatment which acts as its biggest limitation as it slightly contradicts its original intention. However, even though this was the case millions of people continued to be treated and their health improved nonetheless which illustrates its success Right wing historians argue that the NHS was too generous in allowing to get free dentures and prescriptions, that there were too wasteful of resources. Furthermore, there still remains great historical debate that it seemed overgenerous for a country so recently battered economically by the world war. Critics similarly argue that the Labour government should have concentrated on the rebuilding of shattered industries than reforming the healthcare system so radically - Cornelli Bernett argues that the NHS was too expensive, and the government should have got the economy…

    • 3424 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons why death rates have decreased in the last 100 years or so is largely because of medical improvements that have been a consequence of technological advancements. These advancements in technology have allowed new treatments to be found to cure diseases that were previously incurable and deadly beforehand. This has also paved the way to new illnesses being discovered and cures being found for them, which also ties to medical improvements and the decrease in death rates. The introduction of the NHS in 1945 by the Labour government gave people, who previously were unable to access treatment for illnesses, free access to medical care when they needed it. By it being funded by the government, rather than private businesses, this has increased the quality of care for all citizens because private investors and big businesses that may have owned it previously would have only focused on a profit being fetched in through treatment, rather than actually caring for their patients to a good standard. Through this huge development, death rates would decrease as the trend shows because free accessible healthcare and treatments would be available to all that required…

    • 1237 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So I yield to no-one in my love of the NHS. But I also believe we don’t demonstrate that love by covering up things that go wrong. Or by pretending the NHS can somehow just ignore the big challenges it faces. There are huge issues to solve like how we provide proper personal care for frail and elderly people in our communities. Or how we make sure the NHS is equipped to go on delivering the ground-breaking advances in medicine on which we all depend.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour Reforms 1945-1951

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people regarded the problem of disease as the most important, especially after the war. To tackle this, the Labour Government introduced what is seen by many people to be the most successful creation, the National Health Service. It was created in 1948 and covered everyone’s health issues from hospital care and GPs to free dental and optician care. It was extremely popular to begin with, but the Government were not fully prepared for the expense. The budget had risen by more than 50% of it’s original budget within the first year, but they continued with it anyway. Most people would still say that the NHS was a resounding success, even though many left wing historians argue that it did not eliminate private health care fully. Ultimately, the NHS was one of the greatest creations of the 20th century and is also one of the foundations for the democratic society we live in today.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lord Willaim Beveridge was an aristocratic social reformer who inspired Britain’s National Health Service. This arrangement gives universal coverage to everyone with no bills involved. The proposition is that they believe nobody should ever have to pay a medical bill. There is no insurance premium to pay, no co-payment with virtually no fee at all. Whether one suffers from a mild cold or one receives a quadruple bypass from the nation’s top cardiac surgeon, there are still no fees involved. The doctor’s bills of every single person are paid by the government. People go literally their entire lives without ever having to pay a single doctor or hospital bill. Although this might sound like the perfect plan, in reality, people of this country are still paying these fees, for they pay through a series of network taxes that would essentially make Americans cringe. The sales tax in the United Kingdom runs from 15 to 17.5 percent. The citizens do not only have to pay a high sales tax, but also pay by waiting in lines for care. Reid mentions in the book how he sometimes would have to wait weeks to see specialists for specific injuries. My roommate’s father lived in Britain for 2 years and used this health care system. He suffered from major knee problems and was put on a waiting list for 6 whole months…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Britain has a mixed economy of care provisions. There are many types of them such as: Statutory, private, and voluntary. The statutory sector (also known as public) is fully founded by the government, from the taxes we pay. Its services are free at the point of delivery (some exceptions like dentistry and opticians). The statutory (or public) sector also includes the NHS which provides hospital services and services in the community. The Private sector can be described as market which sells care to people. According to the statistics, 14 million people in the UK use private care in one way or another. Any individual who wishes to use private sector services has to buy the care with cash or personal insurance. However, in the past couple of years the government agreed to found private care in some circumstances. This mainly includes things like plastic surgeries for those who have been badly injured, burned. Private care sectors includes: nursing and residential care homes, abortions, bandages treatments etc. There are advantages and disadvantages of using a private sector. One of the advantages is that private sector seems to provide a better quality care and won’t mess the service user around. Some of the disadvantages include the high costs and ethical or…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Reserve Bank of Australia (1997:7) defines privatisation as the full or partial transfer of ownership of public assets to the private sector (Reserve Bank of Australia 1997). Privatisation gradually increased across the world in the 1980’s originating in Chile, the UK and New Zealand which was a ‘radical reversal’ of the ideology of state ownership (Heraclerous 1999). According to King (2003:2) privatisation began in Australia during the 1980’s with the deregulation of the financial sector and airlines and was accelerated in the 1990’s (King 2002). The first major company to be privatised in Australia was the Commonwealth Bank in 1991 through an IPO (Docherty 2014). Since then the government has privatised multiples state owned companies like Qantas and Telstra (Zhuanf et al. 2014).…

    • 1864 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many studies have show that people without health insurance do not get the health care they need. The sicker they become, the more tests, surgeries, and other health care services they need. This scenario increases costs to the health care…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The current health care system in the United States is in turmoil for many years because of two major problems which continues to be: patient access to care and the cost of care. There are well over 50 million Americans who continue to be uninsured today and a national health care tax called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 has been passed and challenged and upheld by the United States Supreme Court, as a tax not a law, here recently which is suppose to be an answer to most of our health care insurance issues. Even though most Americans may agree that our health care system is in turmoil and needs to be reformed, not everyone agrees that a national health care tax is the solution.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The reform will likely affect cost containment, because the increase in emergency department visits has increased in recent years and the United States is the world’s highest spender on health care. The reason the United States is one of the highest spenders of health care, is because the citizens want the highest quality of service and the shortest amount of time to wait to see the physician. The United States also offers a variety of expensive procedures and technological advancements compared to majority of countries. This puts pressure on hospitals and the staff, to treat the patients to the best of their capabilities, while adhering to their principles and responsibilities. The reform will affect public health by having all citizens have health insurance and emphasizing that all individuals are responsible for their own health. Having the best health, originally starts with the choices the individual makes, either by healthy choices or making the choices to put them at risk for health problems. The reform will affect access to care by limiting the individual's access to the physicians they want to see personally, because health care coverage is restricted on who they can see and afford. Also, with more individuals having access to insurance, that did not have it before, they are going to see physicians on health related problems that…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays