Preview

Should Louisiana Government Be Allowed To Ban Smoking In Public Places?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
543 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Louisiana Government Be Allowed To Ban Smoking In Public Places?
Opinionated Paper #1

Should Louisiana Government be allowed to ban smoking in public places?

If smoking is allowed in public places then the freedom of the non smoker is taken away. If we don’t allow smoking in public places then the smoker’s freedom is then restricted. Therefore banning smoking is a decision between the health of a whole nation versus the freedom of a minority. Which is more important? The millions of people that die from second hand smoke or the smoker who always has that cup of coffee and a quick smoke during their lunch break. It is not fair that the non smokers choose not to smoke by but in public he or she has no choice when it comes to smoking because of second hand smoke. Therefore the Louisiana Government should ban smoking in public places.
…show more content…
What about the non-smoker who always has to respectfully get up and move tables every times someone lights up, or the couple that covers their nose while walking down the street to avoid the smoke traveling in front of them, And let’s not forget the children who are easily sickened and is forced to play in the sand while someone’s father is having a quick smoke on the bench at the park. Smoking should definitely be banned on the non smoker behalf. It is worse for those that work in a bar, café or a restaurant. They have no way of escaping that dirty stale cigarette smell, and it’s not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Let me briefly explain a bit farther my thoughts concerning this subject. Smoking is not inherently wrong, one has the right to smoke but when that right to smoke can adversely affect another especially their health then it should be controlled. Understandable, employees that work in a bar inherently take on reasonable risks in the performance of their duties, but should they be needlessly subjected to cancer causing agents like tobacco and second hand smoke? I say…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe smoking should be banned inside and outside of workplaces, due to the Worksafe health and safety procedures and wellbeing for fellow employees, customers and the general public.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ban on Hiring Smokers

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe there shouldn’t be a ban on hiring smokers because if you really think about it majority of today’s society does smoke. There will be many places that would be underemployed because there won’t be enough people out there to hire because they smoke. If they want to smoke there needs to be a designated place for them to smoke and they either A need to bring a change of clothes to smoke in or B just don’t smoke while working. The change of clothes could be used because the smell of the smoke stays in the clothes and say they are taking care of a patient who has asthma, well the smoke smell on the clothes wouldn’t be good for the patients and there is nothing that covers up the smell of smoke once on your clothes or in your hair. So therefore I think there should not be a ban on hiring smokers.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is recognized for its laws regarding freedom. By allowing smoking in public places, we are taking away the freedom of health from nonsmokers. Through banning areas where smoking is permitted, we limit freedoms of the smoker, but do not eliminate the freedom entirely. The ban would be seen more as a restriction on where these freedoms can be exercised to ensure well being for all people, smokers and nonsmokers. These limitations are for the good of the American people as a whole, which makes the ban an appropriate course of action.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerianpaper

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The health effects of smoking in the workplace are well-known and recent studies have proven not only first hand smoking to be dangerous, but passive or second hand smoke to be just as, if not more dangerous. This is why I believe smoking should be banned both inside and outside of the workplace.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Smoking Bans in Casinos

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Many smokers argue that a smoking ban infringes on their rights to enjoy a cigarette. But really, it’s the non-smoker whose rights are violated when they are forced to gamble or work in a cloud of secondhand smoke. “Research from Stanford and Tufts universities shows secondhand smoke is a danger to millions of casino patrons and thousands of workers” (Myers). People have a right to enjoy a casino without being in danger. Baskies sums it up well:…

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Across the United States early 60 college campuses around the United States have smoke-free policies that affect the entire campus. Recently Chicago, Illinois passed the Clean Indoor Air Act, an important step towards smoke-free bars and restaurants. These recent actions post the question for the University of Iowa. The Iowa campus has around 30 bars near the downtown area. Would a smoking ban for the cities bars be good for the city or the campus? A public smoking ban on Iowa City bar would damage the business structure, public rights, and the city itself.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having heard the opinions of friends and family (who are mostly non-smokers) regarding this issue, the general consensus amongst them is that the law regarding smoking in not only in this country, but in many other places goes too far, impinging upon our (society’s) personal freedoms.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three parties are hurt when the government decrees that no eating establishment can allow smoking. First, it negatively affects the right of the tobacco users who wants to smoke at their favorite spot. Next it takes away the freedom of business owners to choose how they will conduct business and how they will meet the interest of their customers. Third, it affects nonsmokers as occurred in Las Vegas Nevada where smoking was outlawed but it failed to have the desired effect of halting smoking. Owners of eating establishments were forced to stop providing a separate smoking area; in practice the business owners didn’t chase out customers who smoked in the place of business. It was a challenge to enforce and it…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prohibition of public smoking should be taken into consideration. It is a danger to society and no one should be permitted to smoke in public places. Not only does secondhand smoke risk the lives of other people, but firsthand smoke can cause problems for the smoker and give them a bad image. The smell of smoke is terrible and sticks to clothing. Public smoking is unnecessary and should not be accepted into communities.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 26 March, 2003, the New York State legislators approved a state-wide smoking ban in all bars and restaurants. Governor Pataki signed it immediately; a similar bill was defeated one year earlier. The ban took effect July 24, 2003. Many of us believe in our rights or freedoms as citizen, what many forget is sometimes our right or freedoms will impact the rights or freedoms of others. I have countless friends who smoke; I do not. When Texas started to embrace the no smoking policy pioneered by New York, I was pleased. We all have the right or freedom to smoke, but not when it puts others at risk. In a 2007 Gallup poll the poll found that 54% of Americans favored a complete ban inside of restaurants, 34% favored a ban in all hotel rooms, and 29% favored a ban inside of bars. Second hand smoking can be more dangerous than smoking the cigarettes themselves. According to the American Cancer Society Secondhand smoke, also known as environmental tobacco smoke, is a mixture of 2 forms of smoke that come from burning tobacco: the smoke that comes from the end of the burning cigarette, and smoke that is exhaled by a smoker. Some statistics released by the American Cancer Society state:…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tobacco has been a part of our nation’s history since the very beginning. Using tobacco has never been considered a healthy habit, but people today still smoke regardless of the harms done. In New York there have been bans for smoking in public places. This could be a start of a new trend to ban smoking everywhere in the US. However tobacco should not be banned because of individual rights, it’s effect on the economy, and the increased crime it could cause.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2000 the idea of smoking ban laws was in action. The three venues of a bar, restaurant, and workplace were chosen because they are the major source for second hand smoke exposer for non-smoking employees and public. States around the United States were debating whether they should ban smoking in public areas. “Before Delaware passed its smoke-free law in 2002, no state had adopted a comprehensive law making private workplaces, restaurants, and bars smoke-free” (“State Smoke-Free Laws for Worksites, Restaurants, and Bars --- United States, 2000”).…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second hand smoke in the workplace has been linked to an increased risk for heart disease and lung cancer among non-smokers. By placing restrictions on smoking at work, that protects non-smokers from second hand smoke and also helps encourage those who do smoke to quit. I believe that there should be a ban put in the workplace when it comes to smoking. I know that when I go to work I do not want to show up to the smell of smoke, and leave to go home smelling like smoke. If I was to walk into work where people were smoking I would feel as if I could not breathe or work because of the…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays