Preview

Should Government Be Allowed To Search Cell Phones Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Government Be Allowed To Search Cell Phones Essay
How far would you let your privacy be violated? Multiple people will say they don´t mind the law, that they can search your phone without a warrant. Officials should not be permitted to search are phones without a warrant. School and police officials should not be able to search cell phones or social media sites because they do not have a warrant or any reason to randomly check your phone. For example, if a principal doesn't think highly of you or your parents then they could take your phone and find something that doesn't even relate to school and then expel you from school. “Schools have disciplined students for bad online behavior outside of school.” as it says in the Password protected passage. I think that they will over use this power and kids will start leaving schools and schools will shut down. In addition, If a cop pulls you over for a traffic ticket and arrests you for traffic reasons, they should have to get a warrant to use evidence from your phone. “Phone snooping violated the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.” as it is said in Password protected. I think that if they have reason to hold you in contempt then they have time to get a warrant and search your phone. Furthermore, People won’t trust or fell as safe with the police if this happens. …show more content…
“Many people believe schools have the right to punish students if their internet activity leads to bullying or class disruptions.” Pulled from phone patrol. However, This may stop some cyber bullying but then will come back to people bullying physically. There will be more fights and more mental pain then if it was just online. Monitoring students’ online activity is an invasion of privacy and a violation of freedom of speech. The role of educators is to teach, not to monitor kids outside the classroom. Parents should oversee their children’s actions and guide them in the right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first reason is the Revolutionary War, this was a disagreement between Great Britain and the American colonies. The king himself had created a swamp of new buildings and offices. Hitler swamped and took them out. This is showing the colonies were in need of general searches. The British officers were just trying to received taxed goods. The next reason is Carroll v United States 1925. The United States supreme court was doing warrantless searches through automobiles. This is taking it too far, the US supreme court should not be able to go through somebody's vehicle without a warrant. There is no reasonable suspicion, this is just too far. Allowing Farook's Iphone to be unlocked allowed him to set up a terror attack. He was able to send drivers to locations and set up an attack. Apple took it too far and a chance of unlocking his Iphone to do…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should cell phones be banned in privately owned businesses? Since cell phones became popular in the mid nineties, their uses have expanded drastically: from rudimentary functions such as calling and texting, to 3-D video games and access to the internet. Some might argue that these new features can cause more harm than good, especially in a privately owned businesses, but I think that these features can actually improve the experience of the people in those spaces. Cell phones should not be banned in privately owned businesses because they can improve the customer’s experience, benefit the business, and potentially save a life.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To start with, for someone to obtain a search warrant, the police would have to convince the judge that they have a probable cause. If someone commits a crime and the police need to access private information about a certain person, then the police have to make a clear and probable case to the judge and if the judge thinks they are a threat they will give the police that search warrant. Namely, the Fourth Amendment states “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, an effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” People have their privacy protected by many, they keep people and their belongings safe from people that danger you in many ways. The government has protected citizens everyday…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schools around the globe need to be provided with clear boundaries to which their duty of care extends and students, teachers and parents need to be provided with clear avenues to protect them outside the school. Australian legislation and departmental policies have failed to keep up with advances in technology and do not effectively deal with the problems surrounding cyber bullying, either within schools or within society more generally. Australian legislation is extremely limited and requires the adaptation of other legal mechanisms such as anti-stalking and harassment laws to tackle cyber bullying. It also appears that current laws and policies have stemmed from face-to-face bullying measures and are not designed to deal with the new forms of bullying that are possible in the 21st…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the search engine Google. I found an article from the journal.com asking “Are Cell Phone Bans Worth the Trouble. In this particular school, if students were caught on their technology devices the first time they would have to pay a fee of $15 to get their cell phones back or convince a parent to come and pick it up. The second time the student is caught on their device a parent has to come and pick up the phone and also pay the fee. According to the article 32% of school districts had the same policy for personal technology devices. Although in 2010 51% of principals said they were going to allow the use of personal devices in school. In the particular school the principal came to agree with the 51% of the principals allowing students…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitution Amendment IV states, “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." “No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.” (Washington State Constitution, Article I, Section 7) The U.S. Constitution and the Washington State Constitution protect individual privacy by prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures. The rights cover personal possessions and information individual store items on cell phones, computers, and…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the legal information institute website, they bring up one case in Wurie vs the United states in which Brima Wurie was arrested of having 2 packs of cocaine. Officers found the phone and due to his locations of where he had called from and his accounts they traced the address of the suspect back to the home in which they found many more drugs and ammunition. Later, Wurie was convicted of those charges. However, later appealed on the grounds of the 4th amendment saying that the police didn’t have probable cause to search through Wurie’s phone. In the article, it also mentions, “The Court of Appeals noted that information stored on cellular phones is of a kind otherwise off-limits to police searches incident to an arrest.” (Rosales Para. 8). This shows that the court felt that the officer had no reason to go through the phone of the suspect because there wasn’t any need to search for it due to the reason of…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personal freedom is a right that we are fortunate to have today. It allows us the right to our own privacy and personal affairs. National security aims to keep us safe and protect our welfare. So the question is, would you be mad if you found that someone was secretly reading your texts,phone calls and email and storing it all ? Because that's exactly what the government is doing. This heightened security began after the attack on the World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001, and has only grown over the years. Creating better security was obviously a necessity, but in doing so they have directly violated our 4th amendment. All our data has been stored through metadata and programs such as RETRO. The NSA has too much control, they see everything…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cell Phone Privacy

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    B. Police officers have the authority to search a cell phone without a warrant (Sengupta).…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cell phone privacy

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, privacy is a huge issue on its own. “’Privacy is rarely lost in one fell swoop,’ writes George Washington University law Professor Daniel Solove” (Bailey). Privacy is something of by which people are slowly being deprived over the years. Many people just let the government do the minor things and just become complacent like it is nothing, such as monitoring people’s phone calls (Bailey). This is something that should bother many of us. Someone from the government at any time could listen in on someone’s phone call and not even know them. The cell phone is the biggest issue and should be protected. “Many individuals take great care to protect their computers with security software, but forget to address the security of their smartphones” (“Privacy In the Age”). There is software that many people should get to protect their privacy from getting invaded.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As far as searches and seizures go, The Fourth Amendment protects us from such abuse of power by government officials. We are guaranteed our security is as important as our physical needs such as food, clothing and shelter.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmic Cyberbullying

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To begin with, schools interfering with cyber bullying have a potentially complicated outcome for not only the school, but also for the…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you know who is tracking your movements when your turn on your cell phone, or what is being done with that information? These are questions that I recently had to ask myself after reading two insightful articles. The first was by Ronald Bailey called “Your Cellphone is Spying on You” and the other was by Terry J. Allen entitled “Reach Out and Track Someone”. In Ronald Bailey’s article, he explores the use of cellular phone tracking technology by law enforcement and their recent attempts to expand the surveillance laws to include more use of cell phones to track users’ movements without their knowledge. In addition he gives us some perspective on the idea of a big brother watching over us by examining what a future built on limited privacy expectations might look like. Allen gives us his personal perspective on tracking technology and explores abuses that might arise if we continue down the current path. Both of these articles have given me insight into the use of tracking technology and make me question both the moral and legal ramifications of sharing information related to personal movement. There is in fact a moral and legal balance that satisfies the need to protect the privacy of law abiding citizens, prosecute criminals, and protect family and friends through the use of cell phone tracking all…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1984, fourteen year old T.L.O ( her full name was never disclosed due to her age ) was called down to the principal’s office after she was discovered smoking in the girl’s bathroom. T.L.O’s purse was searched and school administrators found cigarettes, one dollar bills, a small amount of marijuana, and other items. T.L.O had stated that she had not been smoking, however, her friend admitted to doing so. After being taken to the police station, T.L.O admitted to selling marijuana at school and smoking in the bathroom. It’s cases like this that emphasize why it’s so important to grant school administrators the right to search its students with reasonable suspicion and probable cause.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At school, safety of the staff and students is the number one concern. If someone does not feel safe, then it’s hard to remain focused on the task at hand. Everyone in the school has the right to an education, and to feel safe. If someone gives another individual a reason to feel unsafe, or does something to jeopardize their safety, proper measures should be taken. I believe that school officials should have the right to search students’ lockers and book bags for security reasons.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays