Preview

Should Freedom Of Speech Be Guidelines?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Freedom Of Speech Be Guidelines?
Freedom of speech is a right that everyone in this country was born with. Does that mean we should be allowed to say anything we want? Should there be guidelines? Without self-monitoring we cannot control speech and make sure everyone has the same freedom. One of the issues is people are allowed to condemn speech for its offensive nature, but forbidding someone from sharing his or her thoughts can become a constitutional issue. The article says, “Fighting words, or comments made to a specific person that might provoke a violent reaction, are not protected by freedom of speech. But offensive comments that are more generally shared are. For example, hate speech is protected when it’s not directed at a specific person. This is speech

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “ The phrase is showing how defending free speech can also be bad, since it's not a right. It also showing how some people can use freedom of speech as a way to defend hate speeches. The tone of the author is confirming the idea of freedom of speech of being a way to encourage hate…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As Americans, we are free to speak and voice our opinions, even when we are critical of government and our elected leaders. Few constraints are put on our freedom of speech, although the Supreme Court has ruled that we do not have the right, for example, to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater,…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intent of the Framers

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Freedom of speech is part of the first amendment which states, “You are free to say almost anything except that which is obscene, slanders another person, or has a high probability of inciting others to take imminent lawless action.” (Patterson, 2008, p. 98) With the freedom of speech it is necessary to put certain restraints into place. The government cannot restrict what people say unless there is a clear and present danger to other people from the voicing of the statement. The freedom of speech was originally intended to give people the right to voice their opinion without being taken to court for it as long as it did not hurt anyone. Currently freedom of speech is viewed as a way to allow people the chance to speak for themselves. By allowing this government is allowing people to have a say in their governance and not ruled by the government without their input. This allows us to have a say in our government and what is represented by us. In 1927, Fiske vs. Kansas was a case that helped to invalidate state laws that restricted expression. The events that changed freedom of speech over the years are the burning of the flag court case, the “pentagon paper” publishing, and other such events throughout the years.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American Citizens our freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution’s first Amendment which “guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition…” (Cornell Law 2017), but that doesn’t or shouldn’t give anyone the right to cause harm or violence against another person or group of people if we do not agree or share the same beliefs. The laws were created to protect us, but many people interpret the laws differently and therefore, feel entitled to speak freely even if it causes…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limitations on freedoms of society are crucial, especially in America. As Roger Rosenblatt noted in his essay, “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead,” many people express their freedom of speech in very offensive and controversial ways. Often their expressions violate other amendments and freedoms as well.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, is there such thing as too much freedom of speech? On one hand we get to vocalize and become more unified as a country. Then on the other hand we could push it so far that we could destroy the country. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law,” but should we (Bond and Smith, Pg.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military Funeral Protest

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Several people take Snyder’s side in the case, : A statement from the Committee for Freedom of the Gregg Leslie Press stated "Most speech will offend somebody and we just need to be able to protect that. We can't have rules that make speech illegal or subject to incredible penalties just because it offends…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With varying opinions and beliefs, our society needs to have unlimited freedom to speak about any and everything that concerns us in order to continually improve our society. The United States First Amendment states that people have the right for absolute freedom of speech, which raises concern for when freedom of speech should be limited. It protects the freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. Freedom of expression is made up of the right of freedom of speech; press; assembly; the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances; and the implied right of association and belief. This right is not restricted to the spoken word but encompasses other mediums of expression that communicate information known generally as “symbolic speech.” People are not using their right to free speech because they feel as if they cannot. This is not the case, just because there is a major conflict doesn’t mean they cannot let their voice be heard. Being able to speak is very important. Without the right to speak one’s mind freely would be forced to agree with everything society stated. With freedom of speech one’s own ideas can 
be…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allowing people to speak freely is easy when what they say is not offensive. Being free to say things that offend or insult other groups of people may be necessary to challenge those in power or to identify problems within society. I am sure some would argue that hate speech serves no purpose but to offend and divide. To that argument, I would quickly point out that we should not be afraid of what people say, write, or think. You don't fight ideas by attempting to silence them. You fight them with better ideas. Also, who decides what is offensive? For example, if someone said, “I'm sick of Black people killing each other in Chicago”, some would find that offensive, but is that hate speech? We can easily say no, but it would not be our decision. Once a law is in place, those in charge decide how it is implemented. This is the other problem with limiting free speech, those in power would set and interpret the law. History is littered with examples of people gaining power then using that power to silence their…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are now limitations of free speech that were not put in place before because they have evolved as a problem of our society in this day and age. These limitations that "Fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," (Richards) "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak" (Richards). The Supreme Court of the United States of America fully supports and condones the First Amendment in all aspects and cases that don’t fall under any of these categories. This law is held to the highest importance because our country is run off of the human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and without freedom to have a voice this would not exist. The limitations are set in place, but when the Founding Fathers passed this Amendment they wanted absolute freedom of speech, as they felt there should be no limits on what can be said and not said. Everyone has a voice or at least that’s how it started off. Present day issues, such as the items listed above, shouldn’t create a limitation on what can and cannot be said. That’s why we live in a free country unlike any in the world.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of speech is a beautiful idea. As a matter of fact, the first amendment itself is perhaps the greatest amendment in the Bill of Rights. As something that we take for granted most of the time, we never truly realize how much of a blessing it is to speak your mind and have decent conversations with each other. However, if you want it to rain, you have to deal with the mud and there are many examples of people spitting out stupid ideas or thoughts that should be kept to themselves.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Issue

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Being able to express one’s self is one of the most important rights of the people to maintain a connected society right to speech should be accepted to do so. The first amendment is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals have. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. This amendment describes the principal rights of the citizens of the United States. If the citizens were unable to criticize the government, it would be impossible to regulate order. By looking at freedom of speech there is also freedom of assembly and freedom of press that are crucial for the United States democracy. According to the “Derechos, Human Rights”, freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous rights, because it means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. These types of rights are protected by the first amendment. There are groups for example like ACLU and other type of organization. ACLU is “America’s nation's guardian of liberty”, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights that the Constitution protects. We should be allowed to try our first amendment right specifically dealing with freedom of speech.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are people that degrade others online by cursing or using language that can hurt the person's feelings. Even though what they are saying is not true, the words make the person feel like they don’t belong. Those people should not be protected under the First Amendment because they are intentionally hurting someone else. A person does not have the right to express themselves if what they're saying has a negative impact on others. For example, if you were in the debate and someone started to curse you out making you feel useless this not something that the first amendment should protect. Another example would be when kids in school use foul language towards the teacher. This is disrespectful and impolite to do to a teacher. This is not considered to be freedom of speech because if a student does this they are punished by being expelled or suspended. The interpretation of freedom of speech is different for everyone and that's why limits should be created on the First…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should we increased limits on freedom of speech? Yes, why well first because if we have to much then more and more people would not be happy. Then there would be name calling and other people kicking out other people because they don't like them being there. Yes we do that…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays