Limitations on freedoms of society are crucial, especially in America. As Roger Rosenblatt noted in his essay, “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead,” many people express their freedom of speech in very offensive and controversial ways. Often their expressions violate other amendments and freedoms as well. A few examples given by Rosenblatt included acts of freedom of speech performed by professional sports players. Many believe these were just their statements of opinion and in turn, their right as an American. However, I find them offensive to say the least. One problem with their open dialect is the position they hold in society. As a public figure, representing a professional sports team, they should not be able to vocalize such ignorant thoughts. Not only do many people in America and other countries as well, idolize them, they also represent the team they are employed by. This gives the whole team a bad reputation, among others. As an American, we all equally have the right to be whomever we choose. By stating their opinions of non-acceptance, they are violating other freedoms expressed by those they offend. In his essay, Rosenblatt made a very relevant point when he said, “Freedom is like a legal drug. How far will we go?” Limitations of our verbal freedom are not only necessary but important for our society’s wellbeing. His example of the interview with Philip Morris was a seamless example of what offends me personally about American freedoms. Rosenblatt’s question, “How do they live with themselves,” was ignorantly answered, “Quite comfortably, thanks.” Not only is it unpleasant to know the company has knowledge of the harm their product causes the society that keeps them in business, but to read their free expression of belligerent speech is downright appalling. This excerpt is one of the many examples of how free speech can only justify harsh punishment for wrong doing verbally notated. It is not hard to locate offensive expressions in American society and history. The title of Roger Rosenblatt’s essay, “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead,” is a truly suitable title for the description of errors in free speech and the many oblivious expressions of the First Amendment.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The writer opinion is that protecting freedom of speech is now up to people of the Internet age. As institutional gatekeepers lose their power to control information, it becomes easier for self- appointed individual gatekeepers to step in. The common result is barbarous accusations and calls for an apology in response to online content. The authors…
- 684 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are instances when freedom of speech is impaired, even though it is a constitutional right given to all Americans. This fundamental freedom is abridged when someone is bound by ludicrous Non-Disclosure Agreements, or NDA’s, on college campuses by enforcement, and in some forms by social media. According to Joanna Vamvaka, a speech writer, states, “In that sense, fundamental right to free speech serves as limitation to its own limitation” (Vamvaka 1).…
- 691 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The concept of Freedom of speech is one which is held sovereign by many constitutions and individuals, especially within the American states. The idea of limiting an American citizen’s freedom of speech would be highly offensive and seen as an act only a dictatorial Government would undertake which, with many factors considered, is true. The actions that in many cases are considered by these Governments are; Threats of imprisonments if the individual acts in an unfavourable way, prohibition of political parties and protests, also a very common limitation undertook within many places, such as Korea, is the censorship of the media and the killing or imprisonment of Journalists who have took part in media considered offensive to the current Government or acts which are seen as manipulating the minds of the citizens of said Country.…
- 1006 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the writer does not have an actual works cited page, the writer cites from the Omaha World-Herald and US District Judge Kathryn Vratil. The use of the different frames makes the writers opinion more acceptable. When discussing the incident at the airport, the columnist makes it clear that the accusations the customers made were ludicrous. At the end of the essay the writer makes his point eloquently, “The First Amendment says nothing about a right not to be offended. The risk of finding someone else's speech offensive is the price each of us pays for our own free speech. Free people don't run to court -- or to the principal -- when they encounter a message they don't like. They answer it with one of their own”. What the columnist is basically saying is that in…
- 363 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The concept of free speech has been an enduring and drama-filled issue in the United States. While Americans enjoy a much higher level of freedom than residents of oppressive and dictatorial countries in the world, the Constitution remains in some areas ambiguous and open to interpretation and manipulation. It has been – and will continue to be – difficult to find the balance between allowing generous expressive freedom and protecting citizens from the harmful effects of hate speech. This balance is essential to the well-being of society; when either side is missing, people suffer and the integrity of the American people and Constitution suddenly finds itself at risk.…
- 1945 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Freedom of speech is often invoked in defence of offensive comments and works of art. At the other extreme, it is generally accepted that freedom of speech does not include a right to, quoting an oft-used example, yell "fire" in a crowded building that is not actually on fire. Various limits to what one is allowed to say are generally accepted, and include forbidding libel and slander, at least to some extent.…
- 462 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The idea of Freedom of Expression is recognized as a fundamental right in the construction of the United States constitution. For centuries, philosophers have presented their viewpoints and rationalities on how the idea of freedom of expression should be handled and what qualities this right should embrace. Philosophers Ronald Dworkin and John Stuart Mill have both presented personal thoughts on the rationalization of liberty of expression, and why it is imperative that we as a society defend this right. Ronald Dworkin and John Stuart Mill both present similar ideas when focusing on this subject, stating that it is a vital aspect to the success of society, but also have differing viewpoints on whether these rights should be controlled in certain situations. Ronald Dworkin supports a society where speech is almost completely uninhibited and should only be limited within an extreme extenuating circumstance. However, while he fully supports the idea of freedom of speech, John Stuart Mill also supports his thought of the “Harm Principle”, and the idea that free speech should not infringe upon it and should be controlled if it does. Unlike the ideas of Dworkin, John Stewart Mill presents the ideas of situations which need to be controlled in every day circumstances; and while he supports the overall idea of freedom of speech, he recognizes the management which is required when the rights of one are affected by the actions of another, in due course creating a system that is superior to that of Dworkin’s in the role of society, while ultimately achieving the same goal of freedom of expression.…
- 1071 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The limitations of freedom of speech have been highly debated for years. Although the right of free speech is explicitly stated in the United States Constitution, society encourages individuals to use self-censorship. Self-censorship is a decision not to say something. Self-censorship is usually done to avoid hurting someone else’s feelings, but it is also a form of assimilation. When individuals have an unpopular opinion, often times they will keep it to themselves to avoid backlash and criticism from their peers. Without people sharing their unpopular opinions in a public platform, there would not be any of the great historical figures that are known today like Angela Davis, Martin Luther King Jr., and Maya Angelou. Sometimes, one person’s strong views are enough to spark a national or even global movement.…
- 537 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Dwight D. Eisenhower once said, "America is best described by one word, freedom." Among the many freedoms we hold in this country, the freedom of speech allows us to publicize our opinions peacefully. Citizens of the US have the entitlement to say what we want and are not forced to live in…
- 419 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
George Orwell once famously said If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.' This sentence sums up the very essence of free speech; it is, as Orwell believed, the mother of all civil rights. Without the unconditional freedom to offend it cannot exist. Ideas are, more often than not, dangerous things. There is little point in having freedom of speech if it only defends the most popular and innocuous of opinions. The freedom to offend can perpetrate racial, social or religious intolerance; however, conversely, it is also the only means available to fight against such bigotry. Free speech is not something to work towards when the world is better'; it is, rather, the vital tool through which a better world can be built. Absolute free speech is the cornerstone of all civil rights; without it we cannot truly progress.…
- 1372 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
“Freedom of speech is the right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc.” Yet we are bound to such limitations in expressing our right of speech that mainly endangers public and personal safety and affect silence of other aliens. We can express whatever we want to say in terms of arts, writings, songs, and many more but to what extent? We can talk freely about the issues that concerns us in a daily basis, talking to our workmates about politics, economics, science, calamities and a lot of topics. Truly, we can manipulate things in proper order and sequence as the days goes by without realizing that we went too far. We subsequently intended to freely enact things that is contributory to the betterment of the public but animus or hostile to other group or individual. We fail to think about the result of our actions, if it is indecent and can hurt other people’s silence or if it is against to their standards and moral principles.…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
George Washington once proclaimed that “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter”-while many of us would not argue the right to freedom of speech we may start to question just how boundless freedom should really be. Throughout history, it has often been proven that words have the ability to translate into violent and often fatal actions, yet we continue to accept these actions in the name of free speech. Lawmakers continue to debate over the boundaries regarding freedom of speech and whether limitations would forward or suppress our supposedly dignified and civilized society. Humans seem to be sensitive species as social media comments, political speeches and satirical statements continue to spark controversy and dominate news headlines. Hate speech does not only put our community harmony at risk but also encourages violence as it interferes with other basic human rights to a safe and tolerant environment.…
- 717 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Apart from the concrete realities, freedom of speech is greatly desired and is vital to our way of life. History shows us, that we advance when our beliefs are challenged by the free exchange of ideas. Who can argue against this?…
- 319 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy argues, “Free speech becomes a volatile issue when it is highly valued because only then do the limitations placed upon it become controversial.” Although I agree that America values free speech, I believe that the American citizen values only their own free speech. Appreciating my own free speech but no one else’s begins the endless cycle of an easily offended nation. Today’s culture utilizes free speech to stop free speech. When one person believes in marriage meant for a male and female and another believes in marriage for any mix of genders, who calls who a hater? Well balanced tolerance solves the problem of offending others, but only through patience . Society continually presents itself with contradicting views, as a part of human nature. Attempting to protect people from each other's views only opens the door to an easily offended population. It becomes effortless in a society of instant gratification to let narcissism take over. Once America loses the tolerance facet of citizenship, it allows everyone to offend each…
- 842 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The first amendment guarantees a right to freedom of speech, but how far does that the right of freedom of speech reach? Is there a limit to what you are allowed to say without being penalized under the court of law? Can the government suppress your right of speech if it violates civil standards? These are some of the many questions in will be discussing through this paper with you. According to the first amendment of the us constitution, one of the basic principles our country is based on is freedom of speech. Solely because of this as ages has passed in a still young country. The first amendment has greater use then previously stated its intentions to be. What speech is such thus uses to reach this liberation and freedom? Freedom of speech is the most powerful amendments that we have in the United States constitution, without this right many of the things we see today such as technology, music, and innovations would not subsist in our modern world that we live in, civilization would be left oblivious. Just think if you could be fined, jailed, or killed for speaking your mind. Freedom of speech is American citizens a basic line of communication for whatever one chooses to believe in, with freedom of speech you are able to express your thoughts freely without many judging, and followers of your beliefs will speak stronger and in volumes. This amendment also entails that there be separation of the church and state be maintained. Free speech sounds like a simple thought but when you actually contemplate on the subject without free speech this world that we live in today would be very much different from what we are living in now. Think about the things that are going on today, things that you read and see on the web or on television you would not be able to see if free speech was not implemented in our constitution life would beat…
- 707 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays