Preview

Should A Nuclear Power Plant Be Built In Port Augusta?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
627 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should A Nuclear Power Plant Be Built In Port Augusta?
Should a nuclear power plant be built in Port Augusta?
Introduction In this era of modern technology, electricity is universally needed constantly. There are several ways to generate electricity, and nuclear energy is one of them. The process of generating electricity from radioactive materials such as uranium, is complicated, hard and dangerous. The process is called nuclear fission, it works by splitting particular atoms to generate heat. Nuclear energy is clean and would also open up more job opportunities within the community. People’s opinions of nuclear energy is wildly split down the middle, either safe and clean or dangerous and risky. So should Port Augusta have a power station? Nuclear energy has plenty of positives and negatives, and this report will outline some of the most important ones.
Chemical background It was discovered by Otto Hahn that uranium’s nucleus could be split in half, into to almost identical pieces, these smaller pieces would split in half again. This would create lots of
…show more content…
Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which is why the earth’s temperatures are rising. Nuclear power plants release steam vapour which is better for the environment, because as it cools and condenses, it turns back into water. When the water is being turned to steam within the power plant, it doesn’t become radioactive. The power plant is designed so that the water doesn’t become poisoned, and that the water returns to the environment, more of less how it was before. Port Augusta has an abundance of water, and a power plant will draw people to the region, so why shouldn’t Port Augusta have a nuclear power

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one scholarly source other than the textbook to support your points. Cite your sources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar, in your online course.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power plants do not release harmful carbon dioxide into the environment like the fossil fuels that are mostly used. Therefore, it can actually help with the problem of global warming around the world and even here. Nuclear power plants are also considered more reliable since they do not depend on the wind or the sun in order to produce energy. This means that nuclear energy can provide a more reliable base load of energy even when the demand for energy is very high like during the summer months when everyone is using their air conditioners.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Recently, a client of mine bought real estate near Donald C. Cook Nuclear Generating Station, which is in Bridgman Michigan. Although, the property is six miles north of the nuclear power plant, the buyer decided that it was not an issue and bought the place. The property sits in a beautiful wooded area overlooking Lake Michigan with a cozy ranch, mile long driveway, and old hardwood trees. One would never notice there is a nuclear power plant down the street when sitting by the pond skipping stones across a quiet serene boutique farm and vineyard. This property also sits in Cook 's emergency zone located on an evacuation map on their website. Taking a look at the brochure and website of Cook 's nuclear station, one would be amazed to see all the precautionary steps taken to protect the nuclear reactor that is enclosed in a 3 ½ ft thick concrete wall reinforced with three layers of steel rebar in a reactor house that is heavily guarded by security personal with guns www.cookinfo.com). The brochure even includes an explanation of the not so foreseeable disaster if a plane crashed into the reactor house and how there is “very few combustible material to fuel a fire” (www.cookinfo.com). Nonetheless, it is a nuclear power plant, but what are the pros and cons of using them to power the nation? Is there better energy sources out there like the sun or water? What about the locations of nuclear plants?…

    • 1572 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nucleat Power in Australia

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Currently, an increasing number of countries have developed nuclear power and adopted nuclear power as their main source of power. However, not all countries support the development of nuclear power. A great deal of residents concerns which have swept across much of the developed world was caused by the growing nuclear industry overseas (Falk ,Green & Mudd 2006).In Australia, nuclear power is not used due to the worries about safety and pollution, but some experts point out that the perception about nuclear power should change, because it is possible that the use of electricity in Australia will double during the period from 2040 to 2050 relative to what it is today (Switkowski 2007).Opinions on whether Australia should adopt nuclear power as main source of power are divided. The controversy has become more heated following the growing concerns that traditional energy is running out. A majority of individuals tend to insist that Australia should not develop nuclear power. However, this essay will discuss that Australia should adopt nuclear power for several reasons: the raw materials of nuclear power, uranium, is abundant in Australia, and to a large extent, nuclear power is more environmentally-friendly and it can bring a lot of economic benefits for Australia, furthermore, the safety concerns are being addressed more effectively over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eart Science Review

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Suppose an electric-generating power plant is about to be built near your house. The local government has not decided whether to allow coal, nuclear, or oil as fuel for the plant (natural gas is not an option). Some groups argue coal is the best choice because there is a 200-year supply and using coal reduces our dependence on foreign oil. Critics argue that burning coal produces three times more global-warming gasses than oil. Coal also produces more dust and expels more acid-rain-causing gases than oil. Others argue that nuclear-generated power produces no greenhouse gases and no other atmospheric pollution. Critics argue that there is presently no long-term location to store the radioactive waste that will be generated and question the safety of nuclear power. Over the life of the plant, nuclear is the least expensive option, followed by coal and then oil.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently the spotlight has been set on renewable energies to assist with weaning off of greenhouse gas emissions, solving issues with energy independence, and to exploit their inherent renewability. Unfortunately our technology is not quite up to speed economically with our wish to rely completely on renewable energy, thus many non-renewable energies are recognized as viable options to power our economy (Fraser, 2011). The United States’ current position on diversifying with non-renewables consists of oil, natural gas, coal, and the less spoken of, nuclear power. Nuclear power is the process by which a reactor contains a slow explosion called fission, which gives off a positive net amount of energy that can be harvested. Of course the social stigma around nuclear is so strong that even if there were an undiscovered completely safe type of nuclear power plant, justifying the complex science would be challenging. After events such as Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island, the vast majority of society believes nuclear energy is nothing more than a death wish. Contrary to popular belief, a safer alternative in nuclear energy has been discovered and has been gaining popularity over the past few years despite the recent tragedy in Japan (Sorensen, 2011). Though newly rekindled, the non-mainstream nuclear power known as Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) was discovered in the 1960’s and had been proved to be a very attractive option to the more popular Light Water Reactor (LWR). It all began with nuclear physicist Alvin Weinberg, who would graduate from the University of Chicago soon become research director at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Weinberg was given the freedom to experiment with designing multiple types of nuclear reactors including the prominent LWR’s that are in commercial use today. Subsequently Weinberg had noted the potential danger of a LWR and moved on to designing a safer…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Connecticut currently relies heavily on nuclear energy with "nearly half of Connecticut’s net electricity…[coming] from the 2,103-megawatt Millstone nuclear station.” (“U.S Energy Information.”). Many argue that nuclear energy has too many benefits to ignore such as productivity and cost, but its disadvantages simply outweigh these benefits. The most prominent disadvantage is that accidents do happen, and we cannot say another nuclear disaster, such as the Chernobyl accident, will never happen again. Estimates from that accident conclude that somewhere between 15,00 and 30,000…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am ……., speaking to you concerning the topic of whether Australia should use Nuclear Power or not. The problem we are facing is that global warming is increasing, which is very dangerous for our behalf. We are the main cause of global warming, as the ozone layer is deteriorating, but I feel that there are other ways to help it rather than using Nuclear Energy.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plant

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I have herd of your recent decision to build a power plant in our town I personally wanted to make sure you knew the consequences and effects of this before you made any drastic decisions. Over the past decade nuclear power has been used as a source of domestic energy and this has been increasing. But did you ever think about the heat rejection, gaseous emissions, environmental impact, and social impact. When it comes down to the heat rejection nuclear power plants require expelling thermal energy, the different variations of heat need to be cooled off by something and most of the time water is the source that is being used which affect the aquatic life within these bodies of water. As well as causing fluctuations in flow rates of rivers. And for the gaseous emissions they come in different forms of intensity, they use diesel generators to back up the electric power releasing the toxic greenhouse gases along with the exaughst gases from the buildings, these gases cause things such as many skin problems. As for environmental impact in order to build a nuclear plant you need a lot of land/area which disturbs the natural habitat and has several other negative effects on the regions vegetation. The social impact is pretty much all of the things put together it takes over their land exposes them to radiation and ECT. These are just some of the many reasons why I believe you shouldn’t build a power plant in our town; I hope you take this letter into consideration and that it changed your mind.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This research paper serves to show research conducted about nuclear energy in order to draw a conclusion as to if nuclear energy is a solution to the energy crisis or not. As the world is developing further and further and essential energy resources such as coal are getting less and less, new, sustainable energy sources need to be introduced as to not rob future generations of their energy supplies. Other aspects of current energy sources such as global warming etc. also need to be considered. Nuclear energy is sustainable and clean, but can pose huge health and safety risks and can damage the environment. There is a huge debate as to whether nuclear energy should be implemented for the future or phased out.…

    • 4455 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear power stations have been making electric power for over 50 years. People understand their dangers very well so the risk of using them is less than it used to be. Nuclear stations have several advantages over other ways to make electricity: they can run at full power for many months at a time they can make enormous amounts of power from a small amount of fuel. Just one station can provide enough power for a city…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays